Department of Ophthalmology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Retina. 2018 Oct;38(10):2001-2009. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001818.
To compare the 3-year follow-up results of intravitreal injections of aflibercept between fixed dosing (FD) regimen and a pro re nata (PRN) regimen after three initial monthly doses for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and to analyze factors influencing improvement in visual acuity.
We retrospectively studied all treatment-naive patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who were scheduled to receive intravitreal aflibercept injections FD or PRN after induction treatment between March 2013 and May 2014. Best-corrected visual acuity was evaluated before treatment and at 4, 12, 24, and 36 months after initial treatment. Factors that influence improvement in visual acuity were also investigated.
Thirty-three eyes were assessed at the 3-year follow-up examination. Twenty-three eyes were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections every 2 months for at least 1 year after three initial monthly doses (FD group), and 10 eyes were treated PRN after loading doses (PRN group). In the FD group, during the follow-up period from 1 to 3 years, quarterly dosing with capped PRN or a treat and extend regimen were selected. The mean number of administered intravitreal aflibercept was 15.3 ± 4.6 in the FD group and 9.0 ± 8.9 in the PRN group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.004). Significant improvement of the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution values for best-corrected visual acuity was shown at 36 months, as compared to baseline values (P = 0.019). No significant difference in the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity between the two groups was observed at baseline or at 4, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment (all P > 0.05), although there was a trend toward better results in the FD group. Multiple regression analysis showed that the FD group had better visual acuity at 36 months and greater improvement in visual acuity than the PRN group (P = 0.031 for both comparisons).
Intravitreal aflibercept was effective in improving the vision of patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, as evaluated at the 3-year follow-up. Fixed treatment might be an important factor influencing improvement in visual acuity.
比较玻璃体内注射阿柏西普固定剂量(FD)方案与初始 3 个月每月 3 次治疗后行“按需治疗(PRN)”方案 3 年的随访结果,分析影响视力改善的因素。
我们回顾性研究了 2013 年 3 月至 2014 年 5 月期间接受玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗的初治息肉状脉络膜血管病变患者。所有患者均接受诱导治疗后行 FD 或 PRN 方案治疗。在初始治疗后 4、12、24 和 36 个月评估最佳矫正视力。还分析了影响视力改善的因素。
33 只眼在 3 年随访时进行了评估。23 只眼在初始 3 个月每月 3 次治疗后至少 1 年接受玻璃体内注射阿柏西普每 2 个月治疗(FD 组),10 只眼接受 PRN 治疗(PRN 组)。在 FD 组中,从第 1 年到第 3 年的随访期间,选择了每季度 PRN 或“治疗和扩展”方案。FD 组中平均接受玻璃体内注射阿柏西普的次数为 15.3 ± 4.6,PRN 组为 9.0 ± 8.9,两组之间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.004)。与基线值相比,36 个月时最佳矫正视力最小分辨角对数均值显著提高(P = 0.019)。两组治疗后 4、12、24 和 36 个月时最佳矫正视力改善差异均无统计学意义(均 P > 0.05),尽管 FD 组有更好的趋势。多因素回归分析显示,与 PRN 组相比,FD 组在第 36 个月时视力更好,视力改善程度更大(两者比较 P = 0.031)。
玻璃体内注射阿柏西普可有效改善息肉状脉络膜血管病变患者的视力,在 3 年随访时评估。固定治疗可能是影响视力改善的重要因素。