Ji Tao, Yang Yi, Wang Yifei, Sun Kunkun, Guo Wei
Musculoskeletal Tumor Center Department of Pathology, People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7799. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007799.
Both serial arterial embolization (SAE) and denosumab have been proved to be effective in treatment for giant cell tumor (GCT). There is potential synergic effect of combining two methods. The purpose of current study is to justify a new treatment strategy of combination of SAE and denosumab as neoadjuvant or stand-alone treatment for large sacropelvic giant cell tumor.
Pelvic and sacral GCTs tend to be very large size and vascular. The concerns of surgical treatment were invasiveness of extensive surgery, intraoperative hemorrhage, nerve function jeopardized and local recurrence. However, SAE alone may not be adequate for complete removal of the tumor.
All the three cases were proved to be GCT by core-needle biopsy. Post-treatment pathological change was confirmed by further biopsy.
The patient in Case 1 diagnosed of large recurrent sacral GCT received 6 times of endovascular embolizations with 2-month interval and started on denosumab simultaneously after first session of embolization. The second case was a 22-year-old female presented with a massive iliosacral tumor. SAE was performed for 3 sessions and the denosumab was started simultaneously. The patients was on treatment for half year. Both patients experienced a dramatic decrease in symptoms and concomitant improvement in function after the first embolization and weekly injection of denosumab. Tumor removal was performed on patient in case 2. The last case was a pelvic GCT and the patient received SAE and denosumab for half year. The tumor was then removed with purpose of complete cure.
The first patient was still on denosumab with stable tumor. The other two patients were both free of recurrence after surgical removal of the tumors. No denosumab was used postoperatively.
We reported the first three cases treated by combination of SAE and denosumab in the literature and aim to raise an alternative method for large GCT at challenging anatomical locations, for which surgery would carry significant risk. SAE and denosumab can synergically promote sclerosis and result in significant decrease in pain. It is reasonable to consider using SAE combined with denosumab neoadjuvantly to reduce the extensiveness and morbidity of surgery, however further investigation is warranted.
连续动脉栓塞术(SAE)和地诺单抗已被证明在治疗骨巨细胞瘤(GCT)方面均有效。两种方法联合使用可能存在协同效应。本研究的目的是验证一种新的治疗策略,即联合SAE和地诺单抗作为大型骶骨骨盆骨巨细胞瘤的新辅助治疗或独立治疗方法。
骨盆和骶骨的GCT往往体积非常大且血管丰富。手术治疗的顾虑包括广泛手术的侵袭性、术中出血、神经功能受损和局部复发。然而,单独的SAE可能不足以完全切除肿瘤。
所有三例经粗针活检均确诊为GCT。治疗后病理变化通过进一步活检得以证实。
病例1中诊断为大型复发性骶骨GCT的患者接受了6次血管内栓塞术,间隔2个月,在第一次栓塞术后同时开始使用地诺单抗。第二例是一名22岁女性,患有巨大的髂骶部肿瘤。进行了3次SAE,并同时开始使用地诺单抗。该患者接受治疗半年。两名患者在第一次栓塞和每周注射地诺单抗后症状均显著减轻,功能随之改善。对病例2的患者进行了肿瘤切除。最后一例是骨盆GCT,患者接受SAE和地诺单抗治疗半年。然后进行肿瘤切除以实现完全治愈。
第一名患者仍在使用地诺单抗,肿瘤稳定。另外两名患者在手术切除肿瘤后均未复发。术后未使用地诺单抗。
我们在文献中报道了前三例采用SAE和地诺单抗联合治疗的病例,旨在为位于具有挑战性解剖位置的大型GCT提出一种替代方法,对于此类病例手术具有重大风险。SAE和地诺单抗可协同促进硬化并显著减轻疼痛。考虑将SAE与地诺单抗联合作为新辅助治疗以减少手术范围和并发症是合理的,但仍需进一步研究。