• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于良性输尿管回肠狭窄的腔内泌尿外科技术疗效不佳且影响肾功能。

Endo-Urological Techniques for Benign Uretero-Ileal Strictures Have Poor Efficacy and Affect Renal Function.

作者信息

Fransen van de Putte Elisabeth E, de Wall Liesbeth L, van Werkhoven Erik, Heldeweg Eddi A, Bex Axel, van der Poel Henk G, van Rhijn Bas W G, Horenblas Simon, Hendricksen Kees

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2018;100(1):18-24. doi: 10.1159/000475508. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1159/000475508
PMID:28817820
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Uretero-ileal strictures (UES) following urinary diversion are therapeutically challenging. We compared the efficacy, safety and renal outcome following therapeutic endo-urological techniques (EUTs) and open surgical revision of the anastomosis (SRA) for UES.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all EUTs and SRAs performed for UES in 2 hospitals between 1987 and 2015. Restenosis was defined as recurrent radiographically diagnosed hydronephrosis and re-intervention. Renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) decrease was correlated with the number of EUTs per patient.

RESULTS

Eighty-five UES were treated with 105 EUTs and 31 open revisions. Due to total obstruction, 28 (27%) EUTs were aborted. During a median follow-up of 33 months, restenosis occurred following 53 out of 77 (69%) completed EUTs and 4 out of 31 (13%) SRAs (p < 0.001 on univariable and multivariable analyses). No serious (Clavien ≥3b) EUT-related complications occurred vs. 5 (19%) related to SRA (p < 0.001). The number of finalised EUTs was independently associated with eGFR loss (β = 12.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 loss per EUT, p = 0.008), with a significant cutoff value of >1 EUTs. SRA did not affect renal function (β = 6.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 loss, p = 0.276).

CONCLUSIONS

Although EUTs are less invasive, they have an inferior efficacy to SRA. Our results suggest that a maximum of one EUT may be attempted without significantly compromising renal function.

摘要

引言

尿流改道术后输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄(UES)的治疗具有挑战性。我们比较了治疗性腔内泌尿外科技术(EUT)和开放性吻合口手术修复(SRA)治疗UES的疗效、安全性及肾脏转归。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了1987年至2015年间在两家医院对UES进行的所有EUT和SRA。再狭窄定义为影像学再次诊断为肾盂积水且需再次干预。肾功能(估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR])下降与每位患者接受EUT的次数相关。

结果

85例UES接受了105次EUT和31次开放性修复。由于完全梗阻,28次(27%)EUT未完成。在中位随访33个月期间,77次完成的EUT中有53次(69%)发生再狭窄,31次SRA中有4次(13%)发生再狭窄(单变量和多变量分析p<0.001)。未发生严重的(Clavien≥3b级)与EUT相关的并发症,而与SRA相关的有5例(19%)(p<0.001)。完成的EUT次数与eGFR降低独立相关(每次EUT导致eGFR降低12.3 mL/min/1.73 m²,p = 0.008),>1次EUT时有显著临界值。SRA不影响肾功能(eGFR降低6.8 mL/min/1.73 m²,p = 0.276)。

结论

尽管EUT的侵入性较小,但其疗效低于SRA。我们的结果表明,在不显著损害肾功能的情况下,最多可尝试1次EUT。

相似文献

1
Endo-Urological Techniques for Benign Uretero-Ileal Strictures Have Poor Efficacy and Affect Renal Function.用于良性输尿管回肠狭窄的腔内泌尿外科技术疗效不佳且影响肾功能。
Urol Int. 2018;100(1):18-24. doi: 10.1159/000475508. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
2
New clinical insights into the treatment of benign uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后良性输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的治疗新临床见解。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70229. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70229.
3
Ureteroileal strictures after urinary diversion with an ileal segment-is there a place for endourological treatment at all?尿流改道术(输尿管-回肠)后发生的输尿管狭窄 - 内镜治疗是否有一席之地?
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.039. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
4
Treating benign ureteroenteric strictures: 27-year experience comparing endourological techniques with open surgical approach.治疗良性输尿肠吻合口狭窄:内镜技术与开放手术方法比较 27 年经验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jun;37(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2475-4. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Optimizing decision-making process of benign uretero-enteric anastomotic stricture treatment after radical cystectomy.优化根治性膀胱切除术后良性输尿管肠吻合口狭窄治疗的决策过程。
World J Urol. 2023 Mar;41(3):733-738. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04298-y. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Ureteroenteric anastomotic revision as initial management of stricture after urinary diversion.输尿管肠吻合口修复术作为尿流改道后狭窄的初始治疗方法。
Int J Urol. 2017 May;24(5):390-395. doi: 10.1111/iju.13323. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
7
Ureteroileal bypass: a new technic to treat ureteroenteric strictures in urinary diversion.输尿管-回肠旁路术:一种治疗尿流改道术输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的新技术。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):624-628. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0014.
8
Evaluation of conservative approach in the management of ureteroenteric strictures following radical cystectomy with Bricker ileal conduit: a single-center experience.采用Bricker回肠膀胱术行根治性膀胱切除术后输尿管肠吻合口狭窄保守治疗方法的评估:单中心经验
Scand J Urol. 2016 Dec;50(6):439-444. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1232307. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
9
Definition of Benign Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures in Ileal Conduits After Radical Cystectomy: Experience From a Single Center and Previously Published Literature.根治性膀胱切除术后回肠导管良性输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的定义:单中心经验和既往文献复习。
Urology. 2024 May;187:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.033. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
[Endo-urologic treatment of the uretero-intestinal stenoses in patients subjected to diversion].[对接受改道手术患者输尿管肠道狭窄的腔内泌尿外科治疗]
Arch Esp Urol. 1990 Jun;43(5):551-6.

引用本文的文献

1
New clinical insights into the treatment of benign uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后良性输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的治疗新临床见解。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70229. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70229.
2
Impact of radiation on the incidence and management of ureteroenteric strictures: a contemporary single center analysis.辐射对输尿肠吻合口狭窄发生率和处理的影响:当代单中心分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Aug 4;21(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00869-6.
3
A retrosigmoid ileal conduit might prevent ureteroileal anastomotic stricture after ileal conduit diversion.
乙状结肠后回肠代膀胱术可能预防回肠代膀胱术后输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(Suppl 6):S712-S714. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.10.