Evaluation of thrombolysis using tissue plasminogen activator in lower extremity deep venous thrombosis with concomitant femoral-popliteal venous segment involvement.

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines recommend thrombolytic therapy for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Anticoagulation is the standard treatment for femoral-popliteal and tibial-level DVT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using tissue plasminogen activator vs standard anticoagulation alone in patients with lower extremity DVT involving the femoral-popliteal segment.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients referred to the vascular surgery service with lower extremity DVT from 2006 to 2015. Patients who had DVT involving the femoral-popliteal segment were identified, including some patients who had concomitant involvement of iliofemoral and tibial veins. Patients with pure iliofemoral and tibial vein DVT were excluded from this analysis. Review of medical records, follow-up ultrasound studies, hypercoagulable panel, and venography were performed. Comparison of outcomes between patients who received thrombolytic therapy using tissue plasminogen activator and patients who received standard anticoagulation alone was performed. The primary outcomes measured were restoration of patency of the femoral-popliteal segment at 3 months, incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and valvular dysfunction. Secondary outcomes were incidence of bleeding, in-hospital mortality, and pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

The study cohort was composed of 191 patients (CDT, n = 89; anticoagulation alone, n = 102) who met inclusion criteria. Most patients with thrombus involving the femoral-popliteal segment also had proximal venous segment involvement, with 93% of the patient cohort having proximal iliofemoral DVT. Patients who did not receive CDT were older (mean age of 64 years vs 51 years; P < .001) and had more associated comorbidities, such as diabetes, immobility, and cancer. A significant number of patients who received CDT had a positive family history for DVT (21.3% vs 8.8%; P = .023), and it was more likely to be their first episode of DVT (73.0% vs 55.9%; P = .016). Patients who received CDT were more likely to have restoration of patency (74.7% vs 11.1%; P < .001) and lower incidence of PTS (21.3% vs 73.4%; P < .001) and valvular dysfunction (23.0% vs 66.7%; P < .001) compared with patients who were treated with anticoagulation alone. Incidence of bleeding was significantly more for patients treated with anticoagulation alone (14.7% vs 5.6%; P = .018) compared with patients who received CDT. On multivariate analysis, age was the predominant risk factor for bleeding. There was no significant difference in mortality and pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute proximal DVT and concomitant femoral-popliteal venous segment involvement, CDT resulted in superior patency at 3 months and less PTS and valvular reflux. This was achieved without increase in bleeding complications compared with anticoagulation alone. Age was the major factor predictive of bleeding in either group. The results of this study may not be applicable to patients with pure femoral-popliteal venous segment DVT because only 3% of patients had this finding.