• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青年癌症差异的起源:指导研究的逻辑模型。

Origins of Cancer Disparities in Young Adults: Logic Models to Guide Research.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S95-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.022
PMID:28818252
Abstract

Cancer disparities research is motivated by persistent inequities in cancer outcomes by race, ethnicity, social status, neighborhood location, and other subpopulation characteristics. These inequities have proven to be persistent and difficult to alter. Part of the reason for the frustration with slow progress is a lack of appreciation of the long-term nature of the undertaking. It is highly likely that the disparities observed in adulthood find their origins in young adulthood, if not earlier. A long-term perspective is needed, recognizing that successes may take many years to realize. This commentary presents the experience of the Center for Health And Risk in Minority youth and young adults project, which is a comprehensive center of excellence funded by the National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities for addressing disparities and chronic disease prevention in minority youth and young adults. The use of logic models is advanced for this kind of research because they can provide a theory of change and illustrate the course of knowledge translation over time. Logic models for cancer disparities research can place individual project activities in a realistic context that at one time indicates what is possible and reasonable to expect during the duration of a typical research project as well as the future steps that need to be taken on the way to an expected ultimate impact on cancer inequities.

摘要

癌症差异研究的动机是,在种族、族裔、社会地位、社区位置和其他人口特征方面,癌症结果存在持续的不平等。这些不平等已经被证明是持续存在且难以改变的。对进展缓慢感到沮丧的部分原因是,人们没有意识到这项工作的长期性。很可能成年人中观察到的差异起源于青年时期,如果不是更早的话。需要有一个长期的视角,认识到成功可能需要多年时间才能实现。本文评论介绍了少数民族青年和年轻人健康与风险中心项目的经验,该项目是由国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究所资助的一个综合卓越中心,旨在解决少数民族青年和年轻人中的差异和慢性病预防问题。逻辑模型在这种研究中被先进地使用,因为它们可以提供一个变革理论,并说明随着时间的推移知识转化的过程。癌症差异研究的逻辑模型可以将单个项目活动置于现实的背景中,一次表明在典型研究项目的持续时间内以及在实现对癌症不平等的预期最终影响的道路上需要采取的未来步骤中,什么是可能的和合理的期望。

相似文献

1
Origins of Cancer Disparities in Young Adults: Logic Models to Guide Research.青年癌症差异的起源:指导研究的逻辑模型。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S95-S102. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.022.
2
Reducing Cancer and Cancer Disparities: Lessons From a Youth-Generated Diabetes Prevention Campaign.减少癌症和癌症差异:青年主导的糖尿病预防运动的经验教训。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S103-S113. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.024.
3
Population science is science only if you know the population.只有当你了解人口情况时,人口科学才称得上是科学。
J Cancer Educ. 2006 Spring;21(1 Suppl):S22-31. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2101s_6.
4
Cancer in U.S. ethnic and racial minority populations.美国少数族裔和种族群体中的癌症。
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2004;22:217-63.
5
Practice paper of the American Dietetic Association: addressing racial and ethnic health disparities.美国饮食协会实践文件:解决种族和民族健康差异问题。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Mar;111(3):446-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.01.024.
6
Identifying health disparities across the tobacco continuum.识别烟草连续体中的健康差异。
Addiction. 2007 Oct;102 Suppl 2:5-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01952.x.
7
Eliminating disparities in cardiovascular health: six strategic imperatives and a framework for action.消除心血管健康方面的差异:六项战略要务及行动框架
Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1332-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000158134.24860.91.
8
Keeping It Fresh With Hip-Hop Teens: Promising Targeting Strategies for Delivering Public Health Messages to Hard-to-Reach Audiences.与嘻哈青少年保持联系:向难以触及的受众传递公共卫生信息的潜在针对性策略。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):61S-71S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919884545.
9
Advancing a multilevel framework for epidemiologic research on asthma disparities.推进哮喘差异流行病学研究的多层次框架。
Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5 Suppl):757S-769S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1904.
10
The Minority Institution/Cancer Center Partnership Program: the NCI perspective.少数族裔机构/癌症中心合作项目:美国国立癌症研究所的观点。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1 Suppl):5-10. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0267.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Research in 2030: A unique strategic planning process at a comprehensive cancer center.2030年的癌症研究:综合癌症中心独特的战略规划过程。
Prev Oncol Epidemiol. 2023;1(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/28322134.2023.2265563. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
2
Using a Health Equity Lens to Evaluate Short-Term Experiences in Global Health (STEGH).运用健康公平视角评估全球卫生中的短期体验(STEGH)。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Nov 11;86(1):143. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2926.
3
Cancer Prevention During Early Adulthood: Highlights From a Meeting of Experts.成年早期癌症预防:专家会议要点。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3S1):S5-S13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.020.