Suppr超能文献

辅助设备的使用可缩短微创主动脉瓣置换术中的体外循环时间。

Use of Adjuncts Reduces Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time During Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Wang Alice, McCartney Sharon L, Williams Judson B, Ganapathi Asvin, Glower Donald D, Nicoara Alina, Gaca Jeffrey G

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, NC, USA. Electronic correspondence:

Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Mar;26(2):155-160.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) through a mini-thoracotomy is comparable to AVR through a sternotomy, but may have increased surgical times. The development of adjuncts such as the automatic knot fastener and percutaneous coronary sinus (CS) catheter may reduce this disadvantage.

METHODS

A retrospective review conducted between 2002 and 2015 at a single institution revealed 78 patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts. The automatic knot fastener was used on all patients, and a successful CS catheter was placed and confirmed by echocardiography in 67 patients (86%). Patients were propensity matched against those who had MIAVR without adjuncts (n = 78) and through a median sternotomy (n = 78) for assessment of major morbidity. Variables were compared using an unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-squared and Fisher's exact test where appropriate.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts had shorter cross-clamp times (70.5 versus 108.1 and 84.4 min; p <0.0001) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (101.1 versus 166.12 and 127.7 min; p <0.0001) than those who underwent MIAVR without adjuncts or through a median sternotomy. Patients who underwent MIAVR received fewer blood transfusions compared to those undergoing AVR via a median sternotomy (0.6 and 1.2 versus 2.5; p <0.012). Patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts had similar rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) than those undergoing MIAVR without adjuncts (33% versus 22%; p = 0.11), but had higher rates of AF compared to the sternotomy group (33% versus 17%; p = 0.02). Rates of in-hospital morbidity and mortality were similar between all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuncts during MIAVR led to a significant shortening of cross-clamp and CPB times, and to a requirement for fewer blood transfusions. Morbidity and mortality rates after MIAVR were similar to those in patients undergoing a median sternotomy.

摘要

背景

通过小切口开胸进行的微创主动脉瓣置换术(MIAVR)与通过胸骨正中切开术进行的主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)效果相当,但手术时间可能会延长。自动打结器和经皮冠状静脉窦(CS)导管等辅助工具的发展可能会减少这一劣势。

方法

对2002年至2015年在一家机构进行的回顾性研究显示,有78例患者接受了使用辅助工具的MIAVR。所有患者均使用了自动打结器,67例患者(86%)成功放置了CS导管并经超声心动图确认。将这些患者与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者(n = 78)以及通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者(n = 78)进行倾向评分匹配,以评估主要并发症。在适当情况下,使用不成对t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对变量进行比较。

结果

与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR或通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者相比,使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者的主动脉阻断时间(分别为70.5分钟、108.1分钟和84.4分钟;p <0.0001)和体外循环(CPB)时间(分别为101.1分钟、166.12分钟和127.7分钟;p <0.0001)更短。与通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者相比,接受MIAVR的患者输血次数更少(分别为0.6次、1.2次和2.5次;p <0.012)。与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者相比,使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者新发房颤(AF)的发生率相似(分别为33%和22%;p = 0.11),但与胸骨正中切开术组相比,AF发生率更高(分别为33%和17%;p = 0.02)。所有组的住院并发症和死亡率相似。

结论

在MIAVR过程中使用辅助工具可显著缩短主动脉阻断和CPB时间,并减少输血需求。MIAVR后的并发症和死亡率与胸骨正中切开术患者相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验