Wang Alice, McCartney Sharon L, Williams Judson B, Ganapathi Asvin, Glower Donald D, Nicoara Alina, Gaca Jeffrey G
Division of General Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, NC, USA. Electronic correspondence:
Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, NC, USA.
J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Mar;26(2):155-160.
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) through a mini-thoracotomy is comparable to AVR through a sternotomy, but may have increased surgical times. The development of adjuncts such as the automatic knot fastener and percutaneous coronary sinus (CS) catheter may reduce this disadvantage.
A retrospective review conducted between 2002 and 2015 at a single institution revealed 78 patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts. The automatic knot fastener was used on all patients, and a successful CS catheter was placed and confirmed by echocardiography in 67 patients (86%). Patients were propensity matched against those who had MIAVR without adjuncts (n = 78) and through a median sternotomy (n = 78) for assessment of major morbidity. Variables were compared using an unpaired t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-squared and Fisher's exact test where appropriate.
Patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts had shorter cross-clamp times (70.5 versus 108.1 and 84.4 min; p <0.0001) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (101.1 versus 166.12 and 127.7 min; p <0.0001) than those who underwent MIAVR without adjuncts or through a median sternotomy. Patients who underwent MIAVR received fewer blood transfusions compared to those undergoing AVR via a median sternotomy (0.6 and 1.2 versus 2.5; p <0.012). Patients who underwent MIAVR with adjuncts had similar rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) than those undergoing MIAVR without adjuncts (33% versus 22%; p = 0.11), but had higher rates of AF compared to the sternotomy group (33% versus 17%; p = 0.02). Rates of in-hospital morbidity and mortality were similar between all groups.
The use of adjuncts during MIAVR led to a significant shortening of cross-clamp and CPB times, and to a requirement for fewer blood transfusions. Morbidity and mortality rates after MIAVR were similar to those in patients undergoing a median sternotomy.
通过小切口开胸进行的微创主动脉瓣置换术(MIAVR)与通过胸骨正中切开术进行的主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)效果相当,但手术时间可能会延长。自动打结器和经皮冠状静脉窦(CS)导管等辅助工具的发展可能会减少这一劣势。
对2002年至2015年在一家机构进行的回顾性研究显示,有78例患者接受了使用辅助工具的MIAVR。所有患者均使用了自动打结器,67例患者(86%)成功放置了CS导管并经超声心动图确认。将这些患者与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者(n = 78)以及通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者(n = 78)进行倾向评分匹配,以评估主要并发症。在适当情况下,使用不成对t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对变量进行比较。
与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR或通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者相比,使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者的主动脉阻断时间(分别为70.5分钟、108.1分钟和84.4分钟;p <0.0001)和体外循环(CPB)时间(分别为101.1分钟、166.12分钟和127.7分钟;p <0.0001)更短。与通过胸骨正中切开术进行AVR的患者相比,接受MIAVR的患者输血次数更少(分别为0.6次、1.2次和2.5次;p <0.012)。与未使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者相比,使用辅助工具进行MIAVR的患者新发房颤(AF)的发生率相似(分别为33%和22%;p = 0.11),但与胸骨正中切开术组相比,AF发生率更高(分别为33%和17%;p = 0.02)。所有组的住院并发症和死亡率相似。
在MIAVR过程中使用辅助工具可显著缩短主动脉阻断和CPB时间,并减少输血需求。MIAVR后的并发症和死亡率与胸骨正中切开术患者相似。