• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Esophageal Perforation: A Common Clinical Problem with Many Different Management Options.

作者信息

Felmly Lloyd M, Kwon Hyejin, Denlinger Chadrick E, Klapper Jacob A

出版信息

Am Surg. 2017 Aug 1;83(8):911-917.

PMID:28822401
Abstract

Esophageal perforation is a complex clinical entity that has multiple etiologies and variability in presentation, making it challenging to diagnose and treat. The mortality of esophageal perforation has improved because therapies have evolved. Whereas primary repair is the standard of care, multiple treatments may be employed successfully. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of suspected or confirmed esophageal perforation that were admitted to the thoracic surgery service at our institution between January 2011 and June 2016. We reviewed the charts of 61 patients. Twenty-three underwent primary repair, 13 underwent stent placement, 12 underwent drainage, 12 underwent medical management, and one underwent exclusion and diversion. All patients were included in the final analysis except the singular patient who underwent diversion. Overall mortality was 4.9 per cent. None of the studied variables were found to be associated with mortality (P > 0.05). Factors associated with choice of treatment were age (P < 0.0005), Charlson Index (P = 0.032), etiology (P < 0.0005), and location (P = 0.005). The application of different management options is based on a thorough understanding time course, patient anatomy, severity of presentation, and underlying disease process.

摘要

相似文献

1
Esophageal Perforation: A Common Clinical Problem with Many Different Management Options.
Am Surg. 2017 Aug 1;83(8):911-917.
2
Low mortality after treatment for esophageal perforation: a single-center experience.食管穿孔治疗后的低死亡率:单中心经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1669-73; discussion 1673. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.129.
3
A propensity-matched comparison of cost and outcomes after esophageal stent placement or primary surgical repair for iatrogenic esophageal perforation.医源性食管穿孔后食管支架置入或一期手术修复的成本与结局的倾向匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;149(6):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.066. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
Open surgery versus stent placement in failed primary surgical treatment of esophageal perforation - a single institutional experience.食管穿孔初次手术治疗失败后开放手术与支架置入术的比较——单机构经验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1031-6. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1175025. Epub 2016 May 19.
5
Esophageal perforation management using a multidisciplinary minimally invasive treatment algorithm.采用多学科微创治疗算法治疗食管穿孔。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;218(4):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.033. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
[Management of thoracic esophageal perforation].[胸段食管穿孔的管理]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 1999 Feb;21(1):75-9.
7
Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period.食管穿孔的处理选择:12 年期间的分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2010 Apr;23(3):185-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.01017.x. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
8
Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience.食管穿孔的当前管理:20年经验
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(4):374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00918.x. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
9
Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation.食管支架置入术治疗医源性胸段食管穿孔
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jun;83(6):2003-7; discussion 2007-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.02.025.
10
Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation.食管穿孔治疗方法的不断演变
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.08.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulling instead of pushing: A case report of gastrostomy-assisted pull technique as an alternative method for endoluminal sponge placement in EVAC therapy.拉而非推:胃造口辅助牵拉技术作为EVAC治疗中腔内海绵放置替代方法的病例报告
JPGN Rep. 2024 Jan 18;5(1):74-78. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.12040. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Successful Treatment of Fishbone-Induced Esophageal Perforation and Mediastinal Abscess: A Case Report and Literature Review.鱼骨致食管穿孔并纵隔脓肿的成功治疗:病例报告及文献复习。
Am J Case Rep. 2023 Dec 18;24:e942056. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.942056.