Binzhou Centre Hospital, Department of Otorhinolary, Shandong, China.
Binzhou Centre Hospital, Department of Physiatry, Shandong, China.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep-Oct;84(5):545-552. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
In the last decade, there has been an increasing use of biomaterial patches in the regeneration of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations. The major advantages of biomaterial patches are to provisionally restore the physiological function of the middle ear, thereby immediately improving ear symptoms, and act as a scaffold for epithelium migration. However, whether there are additional biological effects on eardrum regeneration is unclear for biological material patching in the clinic.
This study evaluated the healing response for different repair patterns in human traumatic tympanic membrane perforations by endoscopic observation.
In total, 114 patients with traumatic tympanic membrane perforations were allocated sequentially to two groups: the spontaneous healing group (n=57) and Gelfoam patch-treated group (n=57). The closure rate, closure time, and rate of otorrhea were compared between the groups at 3 months.
Ultimately, 107 patients were analyzed in the two groups (52 patients in the spontaneous healing group vs. 55 patients in the Gelfoam patch-treated group). The overall closure rate at the end of the 3 month follow-up period was 90.4% in the spontaneous healing group and 94.5% in the Gelfoam patch-treated group; the difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, the total average closure time was significantly different between the two groups (26.8±9.1 days in the spontaneous healing group vs. 14.7±9.1 days in the Gelfoam patch-treated group, p<0.01). In addition, the closure rate was not significantly different between the spontaneous healing group and Gelfoam patch-treated group regardless of the perforation size. The closure time in the Gelfoam patch-treated group was significantly shorter than that in the spontaneous healing group regardless of the perforation size (small perforations: 7.1±1.6 days vs. 12.6±3.9, medium-sized perforations: 13.3±2.2 days vs. 21.8±4.2 days, and large perforations: 21.2±4.7 days vs. 38.4±5.7 days; p<0.01).
In the regeneration of traumatic tympanic membrane perforations, Gelfoam patching not only plays a scaffolding role for epithelial migration, it also promotes edema and hyperplasia of granulation tissue at the edges of the perforation and accelerates eardrum healing.
在过去的十年中,生物材料补片在创伤性鼓膜穿孔的再生中得到了越来越多的应用。生物材料补片的主要优点是暂时恢复中耳的生理功能,从而立即改善耳部症状,并作为上皮迁移的支架。然而,在临床中,生物材料修补是否对鼓膜再生有额外的生物学效应尚不清楚。
本研究通过内镜观察评估不同修复模式对人类创伤性鼓膜穿孔的愈合反应。
共有 114 例创伤性鼓膜穿孔患者被顺序分配到两组:自发愈合组(n=57)和明胶海绵贴片治疗组(n=57)。在 3 个月时比较两组的闭合率、闭合时间和耳漏率。
最终,两组各有 107 例患者进行了分析(自发愈合组 52 例,明胶海绵贴片治疗组 55 例)。在 3 个月的随访结束时,自发愈合组的总体闭合率为 90.4%,明胶海绵贴片治疗组为 94.5%;差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。然而,两组的总平均闭合时间差异有统计学意义(自发愈合组为 26.8±9.1 天,明胶海绵贴片治疗组为 14.7±9.1 天,p<0.01)。此外,无论穿孔大小如何,自发愈合组和明胶海绵贴片治疗组的闭合率均无显著差异。明胶海绵贴片治疗组的闭合时间明显短于自发愈合组,无论穿孔大小如何(小穿孔:7.1±1.6 天 vs. 12.6±3.9 天,中穿孔:13.3±2.2 天 vs. 21.8±4.2 天,大穿孔:21.2±4.7 天 vs. 38.4±5.7 天;p<0.01)。
在创伤性鼓膜穿孔的再生中,明胶海绵贴片不仅起到上皮迁移的支架作用,还促进穿孔边缘的水肿和肉芽组织增生,加速鼓膜愈合。