Bird Patrick, Flannery Jonathan, Crowley Erin, Agin James, Goins David, Monteroso Lisa
Q Laboratories, Inc., 1400 Harrison Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45214, USA.
3M Food Safety Department, 3M Center, Bldg 260-6B-01, St. Paul, MN 55144, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2017 Jan 1;100(1):82-98. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.16-0236.
3M Molecular Detection Assay (MDA) 2-Listeria uses loop-mediated isothermal amplification and bioluminescence detection to rapidly detect Listeria species in a broad range of food types and environmental surfaces. Using an unpaired study design, MDA 2-Listeria was compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service's Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Chapter 8.09 "Isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes from red meat, poultry and egg products, and environmental samples" reference method for the detection of Listeria in deli turkey and raw chicken breast fillet. Technicians from 13 laboratories located within the continental United States and Canada participated in the collaborative study. Each matrix was evaluated at three levels of contamination: uninoculated control (0 CFU/test portion), low inoculum (0.2-2 CFU/test portion), and high inoculum (2-5 CFU/test portion). Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. Results obtained for the low-inoculum-level test portions produced a difference between two laboratory POD values (dLPOD) with 95% confidence intervals of 0.04 (-0.08, 0.17) for deli turkey, indicating the difference between the methods was not statistically significant at the P = 0.05. For raw chicken breast fillet, a dLPOD value with 95% confidence interval of 0.16 (0.04, 0.28) indicated a statistically significant difference between the two methods, with an observed higher proportion of positive results by the candidate method than the reference method.
3M分子检测分析方法(MDA)2 - 李斯特菌采用环介导等温扩增和生物发光检测技术,可快速检测多种食品类型和环境表面中的李斯特菌属。采用非配对研究设计,将MDA 2 - 李斯特菌与美国农业部食品安全与检验局《微生物实验室指南》第8.09章“从红肉、家禽、蛋类产品及环境样本中分离和鉴定单增李斯特菌”中检测熟食火鸡和生鸡胸肉片中李斯特菌的参考方法进行比较。来自美国本土和加拿大的13个实验室的技术人员参与了这项协作研究。每种基质在三个污染水平下进行评估:未接种对照(0 CFU/测试部分)、低接种量(0.2 - 2 CFU/测试部分)和高接种量(2 - 5 CFU/测试部分)。根据检测概率(POD)统计模型进行统计分析。低接种量水平测试部分的结果显示,熟食火鸡的两个实验室POD值之间的差异(dLPOD),其95%置信区间为0.04(-0.08,0.17),表明在P = 0.05时,两种方法之间的差异无统计学意义。对于生鸡胸肉片,dLPOD值的95%置信区间为0.16(0.04,0.28),表明两种方法之间存在统计学显著差异,候选方法观察到的阳性结果比例高于参考方法。