Fan Zhenmin, Liu Xiao, Sun Anqiang, Zhang Nan, Fan Zhanming, Fan Yubo, Deng Xiaoyan
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou Jiangsu 213001, China; Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Med Eng Phys. 2017 Oct;48:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
Longitudinal anatomic mismatch (LAM) of stenting (i.e., a stenotic artery segment is not fully covered by a deployed stent) worsens the mechanical environment in the treated artery, which most likely is the cause for the associated high risks of restenosis, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. To probe the possibility, we constructed a patient-specific carotid model with two components of plaques (lipid and calcified plaque) based on MRI images; we numerically compared three different stenting scenarios in terms of von Mises stress (VMS) distribution in the treated arteries, namely, the short stenting (LAM), the medium stenting and the long stenting. The results showed that the short stenting led to more areas with abnormally high VMS along the inner surface of the treated artery with a much higher surface-averaged VMS at the distal end of the stent than both the medium and long stenting. While the VMS distribution in the calcified plaques was similar for the three stenting models, it was quite different in the lipid plaques among the three stenting models. The lipid plaque of the short-stent model showed more volume of the lipid plaque subjected to high VMS than those of the other two models. Based on the obtained results, we may infer that the short stenting (i.e., LAM) may aggravate vascular injury due to high VMS on the artery-stent interaction surface and within the lipid plaque. Therefore, to obtain a better outcome, a longer stent, rather than a short one, might be needed for arterial stenting.
支架置入的纵向解剖不匹配(LAM)(即狭窄动脉段未被展开的支架完全覆盖)会恶化治疗动脉中的力学环境,这很可能是再狭窄、心肌梗死和支架血栓形成等相关高风险的原因。为探究这种可能性,我们基于MRI图像构建了一个包含两种斑块成分(脂质斑块和钙化斑块)的患者特异性颈动脉模型;我们在治疗动脉中,就von Mises应力(VMS)分布,对三种不同的支架置入方案进行了数值比较,即短支架置入(LAM)、中等长度支架置入和长支架置入。结果显示,短支架置入导致治疗动脉内表面出现更多VMS异常高的区域,支架远端的表面平均VMS比中等长度和长支架置入时都高得多。虽然三种支架置入模型中钙化斑块内的VMS分布相似,但三种支架置入模型中脂质斑块内的VMS分布却有很大差异。短支架模型的脂质斑块中,承受高VMS的脂质斑块体积比其他两种模型的更大。基于所得结果,我们可以推断,短支架置入(即LAM)可能会因动脉-支架相互作用表面和脂质斑块内的高VMS而加重血管损伤。因此,为获得更好的治疗效果,动脉支架置入可能需要更长的支架,而非短支架。