Jongsma Hidde, van Mierlo-van den Broek Patricia, Imani Farshad, van den Heuvel Daniel, de Vries Jean-Paul P M, Fioole Bram
Department of Vascular Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1293-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.098. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
The optimal endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease has yet to be assessed. Patency rates after uncoated balloon angioplasty are disappointing. Although stents have better outcomes, they also have limitations. Intra-arterial stenting may lead to stent thrombosis and flow pattern disruption, which may result in stent fracture or in-stent restenosis. In the past decade, drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been introduced, and both have been proven to possess antirestenotic features compared with conventional techniques. The objective of this study is to perform a noninferiority analysis of DEBs with provisional bare-metal stenting and primary stenting with DESs in the treatment of femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease. If DEB with provisional bare-metal stenting proves to be noninferior to primary stenting with DESs, DEBs may be the favorable technique because the postoperative long-term limitations of stents will be restricted. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind, multicenter trial. The study population consists of volunteers aged ≥18 years, with chronic, symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (Rutherford-Baker classification 2 to 5) caused by de novo stenotic or occlusive atherosclerotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery or of the popliteal artery (only segment P1). Subjects will be treated with a DEB and provisional bare-metal stenting (if a stenosis >30% or a flow-limiting dissection persists after prolonged inflation with an uncoated balloon) or with primary stenting with a DES. The study will include 254 patients (ratio 1:1). The primary end point is 2-year freedom from binary restenosis, defined as a lumen diameter reduction of <50% assessed by duplex ultrasound imaging (peak systolic velocity ratio <2.5). Secondary end points are technical success, target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, improvement in ankle-brachial index, improvement in Rutherford classification, amputation rate, and mortality rate.
股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的最佳血管内治疗方法尚未得到评估。未涂层球囊血管成形术后的通畅率令人失望。尽管支架有更好的治疗效果,但也存在局限性。动脉内支架置入可能导致支架血栓形成和血流模式破坏,这可能会导致支架断裂或支架内再狭窄。在过去十年中,药物洗脱球囊(DEB)和药物洗脱支架(DES)已被引入,并且与传统技术相比,两者都已被证明具有抗再狭窄特性。本研究的目的是对药物洗脱球囊联合临时裸金属支架置入术与药物洗脱支架直接置入术治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病进行非劣效性分析。如果药物洗脱球囊联合临时裸金属支架置入术被证明不劣于药物洗脱支架直接置入术,那么药物洗脱球囊可能是更有利的技术,因为支架术后的长期局限性将受到限制。这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲、多中心试验。研究人群包括年龄≥18岁的志愿者,患有由股浅动脉或腘动脉(仅P1段)的新发狭窄或闭塞性动脉粥样硬化病变引起的慢性、有症状的外周动脉闭塞性疾病(卢瑟福-贝克分类2至5级)。受试者将接受药物洗脱球囊联合临时裸金属支架置入术(如果在使用未涂层球囊长时间扩张后仍存在>30%的狭窄或限流性夹层)或药物洗脱支架直接置入术治疗。该研究将纳入254例患者(比例为1:1)。主要终点是2年无二元再狭窄,定义为通过双功超声成像评估管腔直径缩小<50%(收缩期峰值流速比<2.5)。次要终点包括技术成功率、靶病变血管重建、靶血管血管重建、踝肱指数改善、卢瑟福分类改善、截肢率和死亡率。