Suppr超能文献

出血风险对急性冠状动脉综合征患者所用支架类型的影响。

Effect of Bleeding Risk on Type of Stent Used in Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

作者信息

Alraies M Chadi, Lee Sang Yeub, Lipinski Michael J, Buchanan Kyle, Steinvil Arie, Rogers Toby, Koifman Edward, Gai Jiaxiang, Torguson Rebecca, Ben-Dor Itsik, Satler Lowell F, Pichard Augusto D, Waksman Ron

机构信息

Division of Interventional Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.

Division of Interventional Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15;120(8):1272-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

Abstract

Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) are at increased risk of bleeding following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) due to the need for longer dual antiplatelet duration. We sought to evaluate the likelihood of receiving DES during PCI in HBR populations and to characterize DES utilization trends over time. Consecutive patients who underwent PCI from April 2003 to September 2015 were identified. HBR is defined as patients fulfilling 1 or more of the HBR criteria: age ≥75 years, anticoagulation use at discharge, history of stroke, cancer in previous 3 years, glucocorticoid use, hemoglobin (Hgb) <11 g/dl, platelet count <100,000/mm, or creatinine clearance (CCr) <40 ml/min. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify which variables predicted DES selection. There were 10,594 patients (41.6%) who the met HBR definition. When adjusting for known risk factors, HBR patients were less likely to receive a DES compared with non-HBR patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.62, p <0.001). A preprocedural Hgb <11 g/dl had the greatest association with choosing DES during PCI (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.57, p <0.001). Within the HBR patients, having 3 or more HBR criteria versus <3 HBR criteria had lower likelihood of receiving a DES (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.57, p <0.001). In conclusion, presence of HBR has a significant impact upon the decision to use DES.

摘要

由于需要更长时间的双联抗血小板治疗,高出血风险(HBR)患者在接受药物洗脱支架(DES)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后出血风险增加。我们试图评估HBR人群在PCI期间接受DES的可能性,并描述DES随时间的使用趋势。确定了2003年4月至2015年9月期间接受PCI的连续患者。HBR定义为符合1项或多项HBR标准的患者:年龄≥75岁、出院时使用抗凝剂、有中风病史、过去3年内患癌症、使用糖皮质激素、血红蛋白(Hgb)<11 g/dl、血小板计数<100,000/mm³或肌酐清除率(CCr)<40 ml/min。进行多变量分析以确定哪些变量可预测DES的选择。有10,594名患者(41.6%)符合HBR定义。在调整已知风险因素后,与非HBR患者相比,HBR患者接受DES的可能性较小(优势比[OR]0.58,95%置信区间[CI]0.54至0.62,p<0.001)。术前Hgb<11 g/dl与PCI期间选择DES的关联最大(OR 0.51,95%CI 0.45至0.57,p<0.001)。在HBR患者中,有3项或更多HBR标准的患者与<3项HBR标准的患者相比,接受DES的可能性较低(OR 0.50,95%CI 0.44至0.57,p<0.001)。总之,HBR的存在对使用DES的决策有重大影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验