DePietro Daniel M, Kiefer Ryan M, Redmond Jonas W, Workman Alan D, Nadolski Gregory J, Gade Terence P, Trerotola Scott O, Hunt Stephen J
Department of Radiology and Division of Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1455-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.040. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
To compare medical student knowledge of and interest in interventional radiology (IR) before and after the integration of an IR lecture series within the gross anatomy course.
Four elective IR lectures were scheduled to coincide with the relevant anatomy dissection curriculum. Anonymous surveys were distributed to 146 students before and after the lectures regarding students' knowledge of and interest in IR, responsibilities of an IR physician, and IR training pathways. Those who did not attend served as controls.
Response rates were 67% (n = 98) in the prelecture group, 55% (n = 22) in the group who attended the lecture, and 28% (n = 30) in the control group. A total of 73% of the prelecture group reported little knowledge of IR compared with other specialties. This decreased to 27% in those who attended the lecture (P < .001). A total of 32% of those who attended believed they had more knowledge of IR than any other specialty, compared with 7% of controls (P value not significant) and 2% of the prelecture group (P < .001). Those in attendance could name a significantly greater number of IR procedures (mean, 1.82) than the prelecture group (mean, 0.57; P < .001). A total of 64% of those who attended would consider a career in IR, compared with 24% in the prelecture group and 33% in the control group (P < .05). A total of 68% of those who attended had knowledge of the IR residency, compared with 5% in the prelecture group and 33% in the control group (P < .05).
Integration of IR education into the gross anatomy course proved to be a highly effective way of teaching preclinical students about IR and generating interest in the field.
比较在大体解剖学课程中整合介入放射学(IR)系列讲座前后医学生对IR的知识掌握情况和兴趣。
安排了四场IR选修讲座,使其与相关解剖学解剖课程同步进行。在讲座前后向146名学生发放了匿名调查问卷,内容涉及学生对IR的知识掌握情况和兴趣、IR医师的职责以及IR培训途径。未参加讲座的学生作为对照组。
讲座前组的回复率为67%(n = 98),参加讲座组的回复率为55%(n = 22),对照组的回复率为28%(n = 30)。讲座前组中共有73%的学生表示对IR的了解与其他专业相比很少。参加讲座的学生中这一比例降至27%(P <.001)。参加讲座的学生中共有32%的人认为他们对IR的了解比其他任何专业都多,相比之下,对照组为7%(P值无统计学意义),讲座前组为2%(P <.001)。参加讲座的学生能说出的IR操作数量(平均1.82项)明显多于讲座前组(平均0.57项;P <.001)。参加讲座的学生中共有64%的人会考虑从事IR职业,相比之下,讲座前组为24%,对照组为33%(P <.05)。参加讲座的学生中共有68%的人了解IR住院医师培训,相比之下,讲座前组为5%,对照组为33%(P <.05)。
将IR教育整合到大体解剖学课程中被证明是向临床前学生传授IR知识并激发该领域兴趣的一种非常有效的方法。