Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes, Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Christophorus Hospital, Coesfeld, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016907.
The direct laryngoscopy technique using a Macintosh blade is the first choice globally for most anaesthetists. In case of an unanticipated difficult airway, the complication rate increases with the number of intubation attempts. Recently, McGrath MAC (McGrath) video laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for securing an airway by tracheal intubation because it allows the visualisation of the glottis without a direct line of sight. Several studies and case reports have highlighted the benefit of the video laryngoscope in the visualisation of the glottis and found it to be superior in difficult intubation situations. The aim of this study was to compare the first-pass intubation success rate using the (McGrath) video laryngoscope compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy in surgical patients.
The EMMA trial is a multicentre, open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring tracheal intubation are randomly allocated to either the McGrath video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. The expected rate of successful first-pass intubation is 95% in the McGrath group and 90% in the Macintosh group. Each group must include a total of 1000 patients to achieve 96% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Successful intubation with the first attempt is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints are the time to intubation, attempts for successful intubation, the necessity of alternatives, visualisation of the glottis using the Cormack & Lehane score and percentage of glottic opening score and definite complications.
The project was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state and Westphalia-Lippe. The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02611986; pre-results.
在大多数麻醉师中,直接喉镜技术使用 Macintosh 叶片是全球的首选。在出现意外困难气道的情况下,随着插管尝试次数的增加,并发症的发生率会增加。最近,McGrath MAC(麦格)视频喉镜已成为通过气管插管确保气道的广泛接受的方法,因为它允许在没有直接视线的情况下观察声门。几项研究和病例报告强调了视频喉镜在观察声门方面的优势,并发现它在困难插管情况下更为优越。本研究的目的是比较手术患者使用(McGrath)视频喉镜与常规直接喉镜的首次插管成功率。
EMMA 试验是一项多中心、开放标签、患者盲法、随机对照试验。需要气管插管的连续患者被随机分配到 McGrath 视频喉镜或使用 Macintosh 喉镜的直接喉镜。预计 McGrath 组的首次插管成功率为 95%,Macintosh 组为 90%。每组必须包括总共 1000 例患者,以达到在 5%显著性水平下检测差异的 96%功率。首次尝试成功插管是主要终点。次要终点是插管时间、成功插管尝试次数、替代方法的必要性、使用 Cormack & Lehane 评分和声带开放评分的百分比评估声门的可视化以及明确的并发症。
该项目得到了莱茵兰-普法尔茨州和威斯特伐利亚-利珀州医学协会当地伦理委员会的批准。该研究的结果将以手稿的形式发表,并在国内外会议上展示。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02611986;预结果。