Lewton Kristi L
Department of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2017 Aug 14;5:e3668. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3668. eCollection 2017.
The physical environments of captive and wild animals frequently differ in substrate types and compliance. As a result, there is an assumption that differences in rearing environments between captive and wild individuals produce differences in skeletal morphology. Here, this hypothesis is tested using a sample of 42 captive and wild common chimpanzees (). Articular surface areas of the humerus, radius, ulna, femur, and tibia were calculated from linear breadth measurements, adjusted for size differences using Mosimann shape variables, and compared across sex and environmental groups using two-way ANOVA. Results indicate that the articular surfaces of the wrist and knee differ between captive and wild chimpanzees; captive individuals have significantly larger distal ulna and tibial plateau articular surfaces. In both captive and wild chimpanzees, males have significantly larger femoral condyles and distal radius surfaces than females. Finally, there is an interaction effect between sex and rearing in the articular surfaces of the femoral condyles and distal radius in which captive males have significantly larger surface areas than all other sex-rearing groups. These data suggest that long bone articular surfaces may be sensitive to differences experienced by captive and wild individuals, such as differences in diet, body mass, positional behaviors, and presumed loading environments. Importantly, these results only find differences due to rearing environment in some long bone articular surfaces. Thus, future work on skeletal morphology could cautiously incorporate data from captive individuals, but should first investigate potential intraspecific differences between captive and wild individuals.
圈养动物和野生动物的物理环境在基质类型和顺应性方面常常存在差异。因此,人们假设圈养个体和野生个体在饲养环境上的差异会导致骨骼形态的差异。在此,使用42只圈养和野生普通黑猩猩的样本对这一假设进行了检验。通过线性宽度测量计算肱骨、桡骨、尺骨、股骨和胫骨的关节表面积,使用莫西曼形状变量对大小差异进行调整,并使用双向方差分析在性别和环境组之间进行比较。结果表明,圈养黑猩猩和野生黑猩猩的腕关节和膝关节表面存在差异;圈养个体的尺骨远端和胫骨平台关节表面明显更大。在圈养和野生黑猩猩中,雄性的股骨髁和桡骨远端表面均明显大于雌性。最后,在股骨髁和桡骨远端的关节表面,性别和饲养方式之间存在交互作用,其中圈养雄性的表面积明显大于所有其他性别 - 饲养方式组。这些数据表明,长骨关节表面可能对圈养个体和野生个体所经历的差异敏感,例如饮食、体重、姿势行为和假定的负荷环境方面的差异。重要的是,这些结果仅在一些长骨关节表面发现了因饲养环境导致的差异。因此,未来关于骨骼形态的研究可以谨慎地纳入圈养个体的数据,但首先应该调查圈养个体和野生个体之间潜在的种内差异。