University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida (Dr Scarton).
University of Cincinnati College of Nursing, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Bakas).
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Oct;43(5):465-475. doi: 10.1177/0145721717726280. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically test the Diabetes Caregiver Activity and Support Scale (D-CASS), a measure of how difficult or easy caregiver activity and supportive behaviors are for family caregivers of persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods Internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and construct validity were examined in 101 family caregivers of persons with T2DM. Participants were recruited using study brochures distributed at a large hospital in the Midwest and at statewide American Indian Pow Wows. Additionally, study brochures were available via a link on Facebook. Data collection occurred by telephone, face-to-face, or through Facebook using measures with evidence of reliability and validity. Family caregivers were predominately female (82.2%), spouses (50.2%), and American Indian (17%), African American (24%), or white (55%). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and psychometric analyses. Results The psychometric analyses resulted in an 11-item D-CASS with evidence of internal consistency reliability (alpha = .82) and test-retest reliability. Evidence of construct validity was obtained using 3 hierarchical multiple regressions guided by a conceptual model. Factor analysis supported the unidimensionality of the D-CASS. Conclusion The 11-item D-CASS is a brief and easy to administer instrument that has evidence of reliability and validity in family caregivers of persons with T2DM.
目的 本研究旨在开发并对糖尿病患者照顾者活动和支持量表(D-CASS)进行心理测量学检验,该量表用于衡量 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的家庭照顾者进行照顾活动和提供支持的难易程度。
方法 在 101 名 2 型糖尿病患者的家庭照顾者中,对内部一致性信度、重测信度、效标关联效度和结构效度进行了检验。参与者通过在中西部一家大医院和全州美国印第安人 Pow Wow 分发研究手册进行招募,此外,还可以通过 Facebook 上的链接获取研究手册。通过电话、面对面或通过 Facebook 使用具有可靠性和有效性证据的措施进行数据收集。家庭照顾者主要为女性(82.2%)、配偶(50.2%)、美国印第安人(17%)、非裔美国人(24%)或白人(55%)。使用描述性统计和心理测量分析对数据进行分析。
结果 心理测量学分析得出了一个 11 项的 D-CASS,具有内部一致性信度(α=.82)和重测信度的证据。使用 3 个分层多元回归,根据概念模型获得了结构有效性的证据。因子分析支持 D-CASS 的单维度性。
结论 11 项的 D-CASS 是一种简短且易于管理的工具,在 T2DM 患者的家庭照顾者中具有可靠性和有效性的证据。