Liu Caihong, Cao Yurou, Yang Jihong, Zhao Haobin, Zahid Kashif Rafiq, Zhao Jin, Qi Chao, Liu Jinlin
Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetic Regulation and Integrative Biology, College of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079. China.
Protein Pept Lett. 2017;24(11):1059-1065. doi: 10.2174/0929866524666170822121558.
Identification of immunogenic antigens is an important step for the vaccine improvement. Previous studies indicated that Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae PalA is homologous to a Haemophilus influenzae protective antigen Hi-PAL (P6) protein. However, PalA protein adversely affects the Apx toxinbased subunit vaccine. The role of PalA in the inactivated vaccine is not known, and the mechanism involved in the PalA-mediated interference has not been investigated.
The main objective of this study was to investigate the possible impacts of PalA on the protective immunity of A. pleuropneumoniae inactivated vaccine.
Coding sequence of the mature peptide of PalA was amplified from A. pleuropneumoniae SLW01, and inserted into the prokaryotic expression plasmid pGEX-KG, so as to generate the recombinant PalA (rPalA) protein. The immunogenicity of rPalA was verified in rabbits. For the protection assay, mice were assigned into 4 groups, and were immunized with TSB, rPalA, bacterin (Bac) and bacterin + rPalA (BacPal), respectively. Humoral immune response was evaluated before each immunization and before challenge. Two weeks after three immunizations, mice were infected with virulent A. pleuropneumoniae 4074. The clinical signs, survival rates and lung bacteria loads were determined. Then a passive protection assay was performed using pooled sera from the active immunization assay.
rPalA was produced in E. coli and was confirmed to be immune-reactive. rPalA is able to elicit a strong humoral immune response in rabbit. Besides, polyclonal antibodies against rPalA is able to recognize the natural PalA in the outer membrane of A. pleuropneumoniae. The positive immunization assay showed that mice immunized with BacPal produced significantly less antibodies against Apx toxins, relative to that of animals immunized with Bac before challenge (P <0.01). After virulent challenge, all mice in the TSB and rPalA groups died within 48 hpi. The survival rates of the Bac and the BacPal groups were 100% and 75%, respectively. The average bacterial loads of the BacPal group was lower than that of the TSB and rPalA groups (P <0.01), but higher than that of the Bac group (P <0.01). The survival rates of mice received pooled anti-sera against TSB, rPalA, BacPal and Bac, were 0%, 0%, 37.5% and 100% after challenge, respectively. In addition, mice in the BacPal group showed moderate to severe lung damage, whereas mice in the Bac group showed relatively normal lung tissues during the histological examination.
Our results demonstrate that A. pleuropneumoniae PalA is an immunogenic but not protective antigen, the existence of PalA suppresses the production of protective antibodies, and thus reduces the protective immunity of inactivated vaccine. Therefore, it should be taken into consideration of these immunogenic but not protective proteins during the development of highly effective vaccines in future.
鉴定免疫原性抗原是改进疫苗的重要一步。先前的研究表明,胸膜肺炎放线杆菌PalA与流感嗜血杆菌保护性抗原Hi-PAL(P6)蛋白同源。然而,PalA蛋白对基于Apx毒素的亚单位疫苗有不利影响。PalA在灭活疫苗中的作用尚不清楚,且PalA介导干扰的机制尚未得到研究。
本研究的主要目的是探讨PalA对胸膜肺炎放线杆菌灭活疫苗保护性免疫的可能影响。
从胸膜肺炎放线杆菌SLW01中扩增PalA成熟肽的编码序列,并将其插入原核表达质粒pGEX-KG中,以产生重组PalA(rPalA)蛋白。在兔中验证rPalA的免疫原性。在保护试验中,将小鼠分为4组,分别用胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(TSB)、rPalA、菌苗(Bac)和菌苗+rPalA(BacPal)进行免疫。在每次免疫前和攻毒前评估体液免疫反应。三次免疫后两周,用强毒胸膜肺炎放线杆菌4074感染小鼠。测定临床症状、存活率和肺细菌载量。然后使用主动免疫试验中的混合血清进行被动保护试验。
rPalA在大肠杆菌中产生,并被证实具有免疫反应性。rPalA能够在兔中引发强烈的体液免疫反应。此外,抗rPalA的多克隆抗体能够识别胸膜肺炎放线杆菌外膜中的天然PalA。阳性免疫试验表明,与攻毒前用Bac免疫的动物相比,用BacPal免疫的小鼠产生的抗Apx毒素抗体明显较少(P<0.01)。强毒攻毒后,TSB组和rPalA组的所有小鼠在感染后48小时内死亡。Bac组和BacPal组的存活率分别为100%和75%。BacPal组的平均细菌载量低于TSB组和rPalA组(P<0.01),但高于Bac组(P<0.01)。在攻毒后,接受针对TSB、rPalA、BacPal和Bac的混合抗血清的小鼠的存活率分别为0%、0%、37.5%和100%。此外,组织学检查显示,BacPal组的小鼠表现出中度至重度肺损伤,而Bac组的小鼠肺组织相对正常。
我们的数据表明,胸膜肺炎放线杆菌PalA是一种免疫原性但非保护性抗原,PalA的存在抑制了保护性抗体的产生,从而降低了灭活疫苗的保护性免疫。因此,在未来开发高效疫苗时应考虑这些免疫原性但非保护性的蛋白。