Singh Binu, Hrywna Mary, Wackowski Olivia A, Delnevo Cristine D, Jane Lewis M, Steinberg Michael B
Department of Health Education & Behavioral Science, Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, 125 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Aug 5;8:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.07.012. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Physicians are rated the most trustworthy source of information for smokers and thus play an increasing role in disseminating information on e-cigarettes to patients. Therefore, it is important to understand what is currently being communicated about e-cigarettes between physicians and patients. This study explored the knowledge, beliefs, communication, and recommendation of e-cigarettes among physicians of various specialties. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in early 2016 with 35 physicians across five different specialties. Interviews were transcribed and coded for the following deductive themes: (1) tobacco cessation recommendation practices, (2) knowledge of e-cigarettes, (3) communication of e-cigarettes with patients, (4) recommendation of e-cigarettes, and (5) general beliefs about e-cigarettes. Physicians across all specialties reported having conversations with patients about e-cigarettes. Conversations were generally prompted by the patient inquiring about e-cigarettes as a cessation method. Overall, physicians felt there was a lack of information on the efficacy and long term health effects but despite lack of evidence, generally did not discourage patients from trying e-cigarettes as a cessation device. Although physicians did not currently recommend e-cigarettes over traditional cessation methods, they were open to recommending e-cigarettes in the future if adequate data became available suggesting effectiveness. Patients are inquiring about e-cigarettes with physicians across various specialties. Future research should continue to study physicians' perceptions/practices given their potential to impact patient behavior and the possibility that such perceptions may change over time in response to the evidence-base on e-cigarettes.
医生被认为是吸烟者最值得信赖的信息来源,因此在向患者传播电子烟信息方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。因此,了解目前医生与患者之间关于电子烟的交流内容非常重要。本研究探讨了不同专业医生对电子烟的知识、信念、交流及推荐情况。2016年初,对五个不同专业的35名医生进行了半结构化访谈。访谈内容被转录并按照以下演绎主题进行编码:(1)戒烟推荐做法;(2)电子烟知识;(3)与患者关于电子烟的交流;(4)电子烟推荐;(5)对电子烟的总体信念。所有专业的医生都报告称与患者进行过关于电子烟的对话。这些对话通常是由患者询问电子烟作为戒烟方法而引发的。总体而言,医生们感到缺乏关于电子烟功效和长期健康影响的信息,但尽管缺乏证据,他们通常并不劝阻患者尝试使用电子烟作为戒烟工具。虽然目前医生并不推荐使用电子烟而非传统戒烟方法,但如果有足够数据表明其有效性,他们愿意在未来推荐电子烟。各专业的患者都在向医生询问电子烟相关问题。鉴于医生对患者行为有潜在影响,且这种认知可能会随着电子烟证据基础的变化而随时间改变,未来研究应继续研究医生的认知/做法。