Suppr超能文献

长期电子烟使用者和尼古丁替代疗法使用者中的尼古丁、致癌物及毒素暴露:一项横断面研究

Nicotine, Carcinogen, and Toxin Exposure in Long-Term E-Cigarette and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Users: A Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Shahab Lion, Goniewicz Maciej L, Blount Benjamin C, Brown Jamie, McNeill Ann, Alwis K Udeni, Feng June, Wang Lanqing, West Robert

机构信息

From University College London and King's College, London, United Kingdom; Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York; and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 21;166(6):390-400. doi: 10.7326/M16-1107. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the rapid increase in the popularity of e-cigarettes and the paucity of associated longitudinal health-related data, the need to assess the potential risks of long-term use is essential.

OBJECTIVE

To compare exposure to nicotine, tobacco-related carcinogens, and toxins among smokers of combustible cigarettes only, former smokers with long-term e-cigarette use only, former smokers with long-term nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use only, long-term dual users of both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes, and long-term users of both combustible cigarettes and NRT.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

The following 5 groups were purposively recruited: combustible cigarette-only users, former smokers with long-term (≥6 months) e-cigarette-only or NRT-only use, and long-term dual combustible cigarette-e-cigarette or combustible cigarette-NRT users (n = 36 to 37 per group; total n = 181).

MEASUREMENTS

Sociodemographic and smoking characteristics were assessed. Participants provided urine and saliva samples and were analyzed for biomarkers of nicotine, tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines (TSNAs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

RESULTS

After confounders were controlled for, no clear between-group differences in salivary or urinary biomarkers of nicotine intake were found. The e-cigarette-only and NRT-only users had significantly lower metabolite levels for TSNAs (including the carcinogenic metabolite 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol [NNAL]) and VOCs (including metabolites of the toxins acrolein; acrylamide; acrylonitrile; 1,3-butadiene; and ethylene oxide) than combustible cigarette-only, dual combustible cigarette-e-cigarette, or dual combustible cigarette-NRT users. The e-cigarette-only users had significantly lower NNAL levels than all other groups. Combustible cigarette-only, dual combustible cigarette-NRT, and dual combustible cigarette-e-cigarette users had largely similar levels of TSNA and VOC metabolites.

LIMITATION

Cross-sectional design with self-selected sample.

CONCLUSION

Former smokers with long-term e-cigarette-only or NRT-only use may obtain roughly similar levels of nicotine compared with smokers of combustible cigarettes only, but results varied. Long-term NRT-only and e-cigarette-only use, but not dual use of NRTs or e-cigarettes with combustible cigarettes, is associated with substantially reduced levels of measured carcinogens and toxins relative to smoking only combustible cigarettes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Cancer Research UK.

摘要

背景

鉴于电子烟的 popularity 迅速上升且相关纵向健康数据匮乏,评估长期使用电子烟的潜在风险至关重要。

目的

比较仅吸可燃香烟的吸烟者、仅长期使用电子烟的 former 吸烟者、仅长期使用尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的 former 吸烟者、可燃香烟和电子烟的长期 dual 用户以及可燃香烟和 NRT 的长期用户之间尼古丁、烟草相关致癌物和毒素的暴露情况。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

英国。

参与者

有目的地招募了以下 5 组人群:仅吸可燃香烟者、长期(≥6 个月)仅使用电子烟或仅使用 NRT 的 former 吸烟者,以及可燃香烟与电子烟或可燃香烟与 NRT 的长期 dual 用户(每组 n = 36 至 37;总计 n = 181)。

测量

评估社会人口统计学和吸烟特征。参与者提供尿液和唾液样本,并分析尼古丁、烟草特异性 N - 亚硝胺(TSNAs)和挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的生物标志物。

结果

在控制混杂因素后,未发现尼古丁摄入量的唾液或尿液生物标志物在组间存在明显差异。仅使用电子烟和仅使用 NRT 的用户的 TSNAs(包括致癌代谢物 4 -(甲基亚硝胺基)-1 -(3 - 吡啶基)-1 - 丁醇[NNAL])和 VOCs(包括毒素丙烯醛、丙烯酰胺、丙烯腈、1,3 - 丁二烯和环氧乙烷的代谢物)的代谢物水平显著低于仅吸可燃香烟、可燃香烟与电子烟 dual 使用或可燃香烟与 NRT dual 使用的用户。仅使用电子烟的用户的 NNAL 水平显著低于所有其他组。仅吸可燃香烟、可燃香烟与 NRT dual 使用以及可燃香烟与电子烟 dual 使用的用户的 TSNA 和 VOC 代谢物水平大致相似。

局限性

采用自我选择样本的横断面设计。

结论

仅长期使用电子烟或仅长期使用 NRT 的 former 吸烟者与仅吸可燃香烟的吸烟者相比,可能获得大致相似的尼古丁水平,但结果存在差异。与仅吸可燃香烟相比,仅长期使用 NRT 或电子烟,而非 NRT 或电子烟与可燃香烟 dual 使用,与所测致癌物和毒素水平大幅降低有关。

主要资金来源

英国癌症研究中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/311b/5362067/c969f3b554a8/emss-71458-f001.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
E-cigarettes: the need for clear communication on relative risks.电子烟:明确传达相对风险的必要性。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00079-3. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验