• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying and Prioritizing Gaps in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients and Health Care Providers to Set the Research Action Plan for the Newly Formed Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumor Collaboration.识别神经内分泌肿瘤研究中的差距并确定其优先级:一项与患者和医疗保健提供者合作的改良德尔菲法,以制定新成立的英联邦神经内分泌肿瘤协作组织的研究行动计划。
J Glob Oncol. 2016 Oct 12;3(4):380-388. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006916. eCollection 2017 Aug.
2
Consensus-Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Neuroendocrine Tumour Care.神经内分泌肿瘤护理的共识衍生质量绩效指标
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 12;8(9):1455. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091455.
3
Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.通过共识推进:一种改进的德尔菲法确定骨肿瘤学的首要研究重点
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3044-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff.确定英国养老院老年人护理的一系列研究重点:一项与养老院工作人员开展的改良德尔菲共识研究
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):284-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw204.
5
A Delphi study on National PICU nursing research priorities in Australia and New Zealand.德尔菲法在澳大利亚和新西兰国家儿科重症监护护理研究重点中的应用。
Aust Crit Care. 2012 Feb;25(1):41-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Identifying research priorities in eating disorders: A Delphi study building consensus across clinicians, researchers, consumers, and carers in Australia.确定饮食失调研究重点:在澳大利亚,通过德尔菲研究在临床医生、研究人员、消费者和照顾者之间达成共识。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jan;53(1):31-40. doi: 10.1002/eat.23172. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Developing a Research Agenda for Adult Palliative Care: A Modified Delphi Study.制定成人姑息治疗研究议程:一项改良德尔菲研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):480-488. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0462. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
8
Follow-Up for Resected Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Practice Survey of the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration (CommNETS) and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS).胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤切除后的随访:英联邦神经内分泌肿瘤协作组(CommNETS)和北美神经内分泌肿瘤学会(NANETS)的实践调查。
Neuroendocrinology. 2018;107(1):32-41. doi: 10.1159/000488394. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
9
The updated national research agenda 2021-2026 for prehospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi study.荷兰2021 - 2026年院前急救医疗服务的更新国家研究议程:一项德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 20;29(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00971-6.
10
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy's identification of national research priorities for physiotherapy using a modified Delphi technique.英国物理治疗学会运用改良德尔菲技术确定物理治疗的国家研究重点。
Physiotherapy. 2012 Sep;98(3):260-72. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.患者和公众参与癌症研究:范围综述。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15530-15543. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6200. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
HRAS overexpression predicts response to Lenvatinib treatment in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.HRAS 过表达可预测胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤对仑伐替尼治疗的反应。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 20;13:1045038. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1045038. eCollection 2022.
3
EMT Molecular Signatures of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的上皮-间质转化分子特征
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 7;23(21):13645. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113645.
4
Diagnostic and Predictive Role of DLL3 Expression in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.DLL3 表达在胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤中的诊断和预测作用。
Endocr Pathol. 2021 Jun;32(2):309-317. doi: 10.1007/s12022-020-09657-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
Consensus-Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Neuroendocrine Tumour Care.神经内分泌肿瘤护理的共识衍生质量绩效指标
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 12;8(9):1455. doi: 10.3390/jcm8091455.

本文引用的文献

1
Research methods to change clinical practice for patients with rare cancers.改变罕见癌症患者临床实践的研究方法。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):e70-e80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00396-4.
2
The value of research collaborations and consortia in rare cancers.研究合作和联盟在罕见癌症中的价值。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):e62-e69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00388-5.
3
Consensus on biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumour disease.神经内分泌肿瘤疾病生物标志物的共识
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):e435-e446. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00186-2.
4
Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Guidelines from a Canadian National Expert Group.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤诊断与管理的共识建议:加拿大国家专家组指南
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2685-99. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4145-0. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
5
Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes.探讨神经内分泌肿瘤发病率的上升:基于人群的流行病学、转移表现和结局分析。
Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;121(4):589-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29099. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the association of coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.采用改良德尔菲法制定大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会的研究重点。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):965-70. doi: 10.1111/codi.12790.
7
Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study.探索公众参与健康和社会护理研究背后价值观的共识与冲突领域:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 10;4(1):e004217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004217.
8
Neuroendocrine tumours: the role of imaging for diagnosis and therapy.神经内分泌肿瘤:影像学在诊断和治疗中的作用。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Feb;10(2):102-14. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.246. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
9
Development of guidelines for tertiary education institutions to assist them in supporting students with a mental illness: a Delphi consensus study with Australian professionals and consumers.制定高等教育机构指南,以帮助其支持患有精神疾病的学生:一项与澳大利亚专业人士和消费者进行德尔菲共识研究。
PeerJ. 2013 Feb 26;1:e43. doi: 10.7717/peerj.43. Print 2013.
10
Prioritising the respiratory research needs of primary care: the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) e-Delphi exercise.确定基层医疗中呼吸研究需求的优先级:国际基层医疗呼吸组(IPCRG)的电子德尔菲法研究。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Mar;21(1):19-27. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00006.

识别神经内分泌肿瘤研究中的差距并确定其优先级:一项与患者和医疗保健提供者合作的改良德尔菲法,以制定新成立的英联邦神经内分泌肿瘤协作组织的研究行动计划。

Identifying and Prioritizing Gaps in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research: A Modified Delphi Process With Patients and Health Care Providers to Set the Research Action Plan for the Newly Formed Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumor Collaboration.

作者信息

Segelov Eva, Chan David, Lawrence Ben, Pavlakis Nick, Kennecke Hagen F, Jackson Christopher, Law Calvin, Singh Simron

机构信息

, University of New South Wales; and , Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; , University of Auckland, Auckland; , University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; , University of British Columbia, Vancouver; and and , Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

J Glob Oncol. 2016 Oct 12;3(4):380-388. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006916. eCollection 2017 Aug.

DOI:10.1200/JGO.2016.006916
PMID:28831446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5560462/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of malignancies that pose challenges common to all rare tumors. The Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumor Collaboration (CommNETS) was established in 2015 to enhance outcomes for patients with NETs in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. A modified Delphi process was undertaken involving patients, clinicians, and researchers to identify gaps in NETs research to produce a comprehensive and defensible research action plan.

METHODS

A three-round modified Delphi process was undertaken with larger representation than usual for medical consensus processes. Patient/advocate and health care provider/researcher expert panels undertook Round 1, which canvassed 17 research priorities and 42 potential topics; in Round 2, these priorities were ranked. Round 3 comprised a face-to-face meeting to generate final consensus rankings and formulate the research action plan.

RESULTS

The Delphi groups consisted of 203 participants in Round 1 (64% health care providers/researchers, 36% patient/advocates; 52% Canadian, 32% Australian, and 17% New Zealander), of whom 132 participated in Round 2. The top eight priorities were biomarker development; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy optimization; trials of new agents in advanced NETs; functional imaging; sequencing therapies for metastatic NETs, including development of validated surrogate end points for studies; pathologic classification; early diagnosis; interventional therapeutics; and curative surgery. Two major areas were ranked significantly higher by patients/advocates: early diagnosis and curative surgery. Six CommNETS working parties were established.

CONCLUSION

This modified Delphi process resulted in a well-founded set of research priorities for the newly formed CommNETS collaboration by involving a large, diverse group of stakeholders. This approach to setting a research agenda for a new collaborative group should be adopted to ensure that research plans reflect unmet needs and priorities in the field.

摘要

目的

神经内分泌肿瘤(NETs)是一类多样的恶性肿瘤,带来了所有罕见肿瘤共有的挑战。英联邦神经内分泌肿瘤协作组(CommNETS)于2015年成立,旨在改善加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰NETs患者的治疗结局。采用了改良的德尔菲法,涉及患者、临床医生和研究人员,以确定NETs研究中的差距,从而制定一份全面且合理的研究行动计划。

方法

开展了三轮改良的德尔菲法,其代表性比通常的医学共识流程更大。患者/倡导者和医疗保健提供者/研究人员专家小组进行了第一轮,探讨了17项研究重点和42个潜在主题;在第二轮中,对这些重点进行了排名。第三轮包括一次面对面会议,以产生最终的共识排名并制定研究行动计划。

结果

德尔菲小组在第一轮中有203名参与者(64%为医疗保健提供者/研究人员,36%为患者/倡导者;52%为加拿大人,32%为澳大利亚人,17%为新西兰人),其中132人参与了第二轮。前八项重点是生物标志物开发;肽受体放射性核素治疗优化;晚期NETs新药试验;功能成像;转移性NETs的序贯治疗,包括为研究开发经过验证的替代终点;病理分类;早期诊断;介入治疗;以及根治性手术。患者/倡导者显著更高地排名了两个主要领域:早期诊断和根治性手术。成立了六个CommNETS工作组。

结论

这种改良的德尔菲法通过让大量不同的利益相关者参与,为新成立的CommNETS合作产生了一套有充分依据的研究重点。应采用这种为新合作组设定研究议程的方法,以确保研究计划反映该领域未满足的需求和重点。