• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定英国养老院老年人护理的一系列研究重点:一项与养老院工作人员开展的改良德尔菲共识研究

Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff.

作者信息

Shepherd Victoria, Wood Fiona, Hood Kerenza

机构信息

South East Wales Trials Unit, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):284-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw204.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afw204
PMID:27852597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5386006/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

currently, there is little evidence base for much of the care provided for older people in care homes. Given the wide range of topics that require further investigation, and limited resources, one solution is to identify the priorities for future research.

METHODS

a modified Delphi technique was used to identify research topics and develop consensus among care home staff participants. The survey was conducted across three rounds. Firstly to elicit topics that were considered by participants to require further research, secondly to prioritise the long list of research questions, followed by a third round to reach a consensus on the highest ranked 15 questions.

RESULTS

eighty-three participants responded to the initial survey, providing 144 questions. Following analysis and review against existing evidence, 76 research questions remained. Of note, 40/83 participants responded to the interim prioritisation round and 43/83 participants responded to the final round, which ranked the top 15 research questions by importance. Two other groups of health and social care professionals also participated in the final ranking. The results from these groups had a similar ordering to those of the original cohort of participants.

CONCLUSION

this is the first study to establish a set of research priorities for older people in the UK care homes. It is hoped that sharing these results with clinicians, researchers and funding bodies will help to begin the process of ensuring that the future research agenda can be focused on the areas of greatest need. Further work to identify the priorities of other key stakeholders is required.

摘要

背景

目前,针对养老院老年人提供的大部分护理工作,几乎没有证据基础。鉴于需要进一步调查的主题范围广泛且资源有限,一种解决方案是确定未来研究的重点。

方法

采用改良的德尔菲技术来确定研究主题并在养老院工作人员参与者中达成共识。该调查分三轮进行。首先,引出参与者认为需要进一步研究的主题;其次,对一长串研究问题进行优先级排序;接着,进行第三轮,就排名最高的15个问题达成共识。

结果

83名参与者回复了初始调查,提出了144个问题。根据现有证据进行分析和审查后,剩下76个研究问题。值得注意的是,83名参与者中有40名回复了中期优先级排序轮,83名参与者中有43名回复了最终轮,最终轮按重要性对前15个研究问题进行了排名。另外两组卫生和社会护理专业人员也参与了最终排名。这些组的结果与最初参与者队列的结果排序相似。

结论

这是第一项为英国养老院老年人确定一系列研究重点的研究。希望与临床医生、研究人员和资助机构分享这些结果,将有助于启动确保未来研究议程能够聚焦于最迫切需求领域的进程。还需要开展进一步工作,以确定其他关键利益相关者的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e438/5386006/aff02a42d089/afw204f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e438/5386006/aff02a42d089/afw204f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e438/5386006/aff02a42d089/afw204f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff.确定英国养老院老年人护理的一系列研究重点:一项与养老院工作人员开展的改良德尔菲共识研究
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):284-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw204.
2
Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.通过共识推进:一种改进的德尔菲法确定骨肿瘤学的首要研究重点
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3044-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Research priorities relating to the debate on assisted dying: what do we still need to know? Results of a modified Delphi technique.与安乐死辩论相关的研究重点:我们仍需了解什么?改良德尔菲技术的结果
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 7;6(6):e012213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012213.
4
Research priorities of the Canadian chiropractic profession: a consensus study using a modified Delphi technique.加拿大整脊疗法行业的研究重点:一项采用改良德尔菲技术的共识研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Dec 12;25:38. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0169-4. eCollection 2017.
5
Defining Priorities for Future Research: Results of the UK Kidney Transplant Priority Setting Partnership.确定未来研究的优先事项:英国肾脏移植优先事项设定合作项目的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0162136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162136. eCollection 2016.
6
Consensus on research priorities for Essex & Herts Air Ambulance: a Delphi study.埃塞克斯和赫特福德郡空中救护研究重点共识:德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 29;29(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00835-z.
7
Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities in HPB surgery across the United Kingdom.采用改良 Delphi 方法制定英国肝胆胰外科研究重点。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1446-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.352. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
8
National priority setting partnership using a Delphi consensus process to develop neonatal research questions suitable for practice-changing randomised trials in the UK.利用德尔菲共识过程建立国家优先事项设定伙伴关系,以确定适合英国进行改变实践的随机试验的新生儿研究问题。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Nov;108(6):569-574. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325504. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
9
Consensus research priorities for facial palsy: A Delphi survey of patients, carers, clinicians and researchers.面瘫的共识研究重点:一项针对患者、护理人员、临床医生和研究人员的德尔菲调查。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Dec;71(12):1777-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.07.037. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership.脊髓损伤的十大研究重点:英国优先事项设定伙伴关系的方法与结果
Spinal Cord. 2016 May;54(5):341-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.199. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the Key Education Priorities Related to Heart Failure Care in Nursing Homes: A Modified Delphi Approach.确定疗养院中与心力衰竭护理相关的关键教育重点:一种改良的德尔菲法。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 5;12(15):1546. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151546.
2
The application of antimicrobial stewardship knowledge to nursing practice: A national survey of United Kingdom pre-registration nursing students.抗菌药物管理知识在护理实践中的应用:对英国预注册护理专业学生的全国性调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):198-209. doi: 10.1111/jan.16195. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Activity provider-facilitated patient and public involvement with care home residents.

本文引用的文献

1
Setting up a clinical trial in care homes: challenges encountered and recommendations for future research practice.在养老院开展临床试验:遇到的挑战及对未来研究实践的建议。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jul 16;8:306. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1276-8.
2
Establishing the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine clinicians in the UK and Ireland.确定英国和爱尔兰儿科急诊医学临床医生的研究重点。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Nov;32(11):864-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204484. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Priority setting partnership to identify the top 10 research priorities for the management of Parkinson's disease.
活动提供者推动患者及公众参与护理院居民护理。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00537-z.
4
Identifying barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of older adults living in UK care homes in research: a scoping review.确定英国养老院中居住的老年人参与研究的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04126-3.
5
Approaches to prioritising research for clinical trial networks: a scoping review.针对临床试验网络的研究优先级排序方法:范围综述。
Trials. 2022 Dec 12;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06928-z.
6
Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme.与老年人相关的研究重点制定:一项范围综述,为 Cochrane-Campbell 全球老龄化伙伴关系工作方案提供信息。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e063485. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063485.
7
In safe hands: a qualitative study on older adults' experiences of a tailored primary health care unit.在安全的手中:一项关于老年人对定制初级医疗保健单位体验的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;40(2):271-280. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2097611. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Identification of research priorities of radiography science: A modified Delphi study in Europe.在欧洲进行的一项改良 Delphi 研究:确定放射科学研究重点。
Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Jun;24(2):423-436. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12938. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Clinical Nurses Research Priorities in Hospital Settings: A Delphi Survey.医院环境中临床护士的研究重点:德尔菲调查
West J Nurs Res. 2022 Aug;44(8):780-787. doi: 10.1177/01939459211017919. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
CO-aVoID: coronavirus outbreak affecting variability of presentations to a local emergency department.CO-aVoID:冠状病毒爆发对当地急诊就诊表现的变异性的影响。
CJEM. 2021 Mar;23(2):232-236. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00036-0. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
确定帕金森病管理十大研究重点的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 14;4(12):e006434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006434.
4
Probiotics for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea (PAAD): a prospective observational study of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (including Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea) in care homes.益生菌治疗抗生素相关性腹泻(PAAD):一项针对养老院中抗生素相关性腹泻(包括艰难梭菌相关性腹泻)的前瞻性观察研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(63):1-84. doi: 10.3310/hta18630.
5
Enabling research in care homes: an evaluation of a national network of research ready care homes.使养老院能够开展研究:对全国研究就绪型养老院网络的评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 5;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-47.
6
International survey of nursing home research priorities.国际养老院研究重点调查。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 May;15(5):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
7
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute--promoting better information, decisions, and health.以患者为中心的结果研究机构——促进更优质的信息、决策和健康。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 13;365(15):e31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109407.
8
A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice.健康研究优先事项设定清单:九条良好实践的常见主题。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Dec 15;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-36.
9
Creating bridges between researchers and long-term care homes to promote quality of life for residents.在研究人员和长期护理机构之间搭建桥梁,以提高居民的生活质量。
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1689-704. doi: 10.1177/1049732310377456. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
10
Challenges to conducting research with older people living in nursing homes.在养老院中与老年人一起开展研究面临的挑战。
BMC Geriatr. 2009 Aug 24;9:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-9-38.