• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚的健康促进和可持续性计划:评估的障碍和促进因素。

Health promotion and sustainability programmes in Australia: barriers and enablers to evaluation.

机构信息

1 Health, Nature & Sustainability Research Group, School of Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

2 School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Health Promot. 2019 Jun;26(2):82-92. doi: 10.1177/1757975917715038. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1177/1757975917715038
PMID:28832245
Abstract

In an era characterised by the adverse impacts of climate change and environmental degradation, health promotion programmes are beginning to actively link human health with environmental sustainability imperatives. This paper draws on a study of health promotion and sustainability programmes in Australia, providing insights to evaluation approaches being used and barriers and enablers to these evaluations. The study was based on a multi-strategy research involving both quantitative and qualitative methods. Health promotion practitioners explained through surveys and semi-structured interviews that they focused on five overarching health and sustainability programme types (healthy and sustainable food, active transport, energy efficiency, contact with nature, and capacity building). Various evaluation methods and indicators (health, social, environmental, economic and demographic) were identified as being valuable for monitoring and evaluating health and sustainability programmes. Findings identified several evaluation enablers such as successful community engagement, knowledge of health and sustainability issues and programme champions, whereas barriers included resource constraints and competing interests. This paper highlights the need for ecological models and evaluation tools to support the design and monitoring of health promotion and sustainability programmes.

摘要

在气候变化和环境恶化负面影响的时代,健康促进计划开始积极将人类健康与环境可持续性目标联系起来。本文借鉴了澳大利亚健康促进和可持续性计划的研究,提供了对正在使用的评估方法以及这些评估的障碍和促进因素的见解。该研究基于涉及定量和定性方法的多策略研究。健康促进从业者通过调查和半结构化访谈解释说,他们专注于五种总体健康和可持续性计划类型(健康和可持续性食品、主动交通、能源效率、与自然接触和能力建设)。确定了各种评估方法和指标(健康、社会、环境、经济和人口统计学),这些方法和指标对于监测和评估健康和可持续性计划具有价值。研究结果确定了一些评估促进因素,例如成功的社区参与、对健康和可持续性问题以及计划拥护者的了解,而障碍则包括资源限制和利益冲突。本文强调需要生态模型和评估工具来支持健康促进和可持续性计划的设计和监测。

相似文献

1
Health promotion and sustainability programmes in Australia: barriers and enablers to evaluation.澳大利亚的健康促进和可持续性计划:评估的障碍和促进因素。
Glob Health Promot. 2019 Jun;26(2):82-92. doi: 10.1177/1757975917715038. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
Exploring Australian health promotion and environmental sustainability initiatives.探索澳大利亚的健康促进与环境可持续发展举措。
Health Promot J Austr. 2016 Apr;27(1):36-42. doi: 10.1071/HE15008.
3
Health promotion and food insecurity: Exploring environmental sustainability principles to guide practice within Australia.促进健康与粮食不安全:探索环境可持续性原则以指导澳大利亚的实践。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Jan;31(1):68-76. doi: 10.1002/hpja.249. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
4
Evaluation of community-based oral health promotion and oral disease prevention--WHO recommendations for improved evidence in public health practice.基于社区的口腔健康促进与口腔疾病预防评估——世界卫生组织关于在公共卫生实践中提高证据质量的建议
Community Dent Health. 2004 Dec;21(4 Suppl):319-29.
5
Sustainable by design: a systematic review of factors for health promotion program sustainability.可持续设计:促进健康计划可持续性的因素系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09091-9.
6
Rise and demise: a case study of public health nutrition in Queensland, Australia, over three decades.兴衰:澳大利亚昆士兰州三十多年公共卫生营养的案例研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Apr 29;37(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab117.
7
Core health promotion competencies in Australia: are they compatible with climate change action?澳大利亚的核心健康促进能力:它们是否与气候变化行动兼容?
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Dec;22 Spec No:S28-33. doi: 10.1071/he11428.
8
Sustainable practice change: professionals' experiences with a multisectoral child health promotion programme in Sweden.可持续实践变革:瑞典多部门儿童健康促进项目中专业人员的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Mar 22;11:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-61.
9
Addressing food insecurity in Australia through education for sustainability.通过可持续发展教育解决澳大利亚的粮食不安全问题。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Dec 1;35(6):1601-1611. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz119.
10
A process evaluation of the 'Aware' and 'Supportive Communities' gambling harm-minimisation programmes in New Zealand.新西兰“意识”和“支持社区”赌博危害最小化项目的过程评估。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):369-376. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx120.

引用本文的文献

1
Including climate change in community-based obesity prevention interventions: a qualitative exploration of the perspectives of Australian funders.将气候变化纳入基于社区的肥胖预防干预措施:对澳大利亚资助者观点的定性探索
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22599-2.
2
[Learning-based monitoring and evaluation within municipal health approaches: insights based on eleven projects].[城市卫生方法中的基于学习的监测与评估:基于十一个项目的见解]
TSG. 2025;103(1):15-19. doi: 10.1007/s12508-025-00454-4. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Culturally adapting an evidence-based intervention to promote a healthy diet and lifestyle for Yup'ik Alaska native communities.
将基于证据的干预措施进行文化适应性调整,以促进尤皮克阿拉斯加原住民社区的健康饮食和生活方式。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2023 Dec;82(1):2159888. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2159888.
4
Perceptions of mothers on child well-being, changes in everyday life and social sustainability: lessons learned from a community-based health promotion programme in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka.母亲对儿童福祉、日常生活变化和社会可持续性的看法:斯里兰卡阿努拉德普勒区基于社区的健康促进方案的经验教训。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2022 May 13;41(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41043-022-00295-w.
5
Success factors of health promotion: Evaluation by DEMATEL and M-DEMATEL methods - A case study in a non-profit organization.健康促进的成功因素:DEMATEL 和 M-DEMATEL 方法的评估-非营利组织的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260801. eCollection 2021.