Bao Shimin, Sweatt Kristin T, Lechago Sarah A, Antal Sarah
University of Houston-Clear Lake.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Oct;50(4):775-788. doi: 10.1002/jaba.404. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
Many Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI) curricula recommend teaching receptive responding before targeting expressive responding (Leaf & McEachin, 1999; Lovaas, 2003). However, a small literature base suggests that teaching expressive responses first may be more efficient when teaching children with ASD and other developmental disabilities (Petursdottir & Carr, 2011). The present study employed an alternating treatments design to compare the effects of three instructional sequences to teach feature, function, and class to three children diagnosed with ASD: (a) receptive-expressive, (b) expressive-receptive, and (c) mixed. The results suggested that expressive-receptive was the most efficient training sequence for all three participants. Additionally, greater emergent responding was observed with the expressive-receptive training sequence.
许多早期密集行为干预(EIBI)课程建议在进行表达性回应训练之前先进行接受性回应训练(利夫和麦金,1999;洛瓦斯,2003)。然而,少量的文献表明,对于患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和其他发育障碍的儿童,先进行表达性回应训练可能更有效(佩图尔斯多蒂尔和卡尔,2011)。本研究采用交替治疗设计,比较三种教学顺序对三名被诊断为ASD的儿童教授特征、功能和类别概念的效果:(a)接受性-表达性,(b)表达性-接受性,以及(c)混合式。结果表明,表达性-接受性顺序对所有三名参与者来说是最有效的训练顺序。此外,在表达性-接受性训练顺序中观察到了更多的自发回应。