Zhang Zhichao, Richardson Christine E, Hennebelle Marie, Taha Ameer Y
Dept. of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Graduate Group in Nutritional Biology, Dept. of Nutrition, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA.
J Food Sci. 2017 Oct;82(10):2291-2297. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13850. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Fatty acid extraction methods are time-consuming and expensive because they involve multiple steps and copious amounts of extraction solvents. In an effort to streamline the fatty acid extraction process, this study compared the standard Folch lipid extraction method to a one-step method involving a column that selectively elutes the lipid phase. The methods were tested on raw beef, salmon, and chicken. Compared to the standard Folch method, the one-step extraction process generally yielded statistically insignificant differences in chicken and salmon fatty acid concentrations, percent composition and weight percent. Initial testing showed that beef stearic, oleic and total fatty acid concentrations were significantly lower by 9-11% with the one-step method as compared to the Folch method, but retesting on a different batch of samples showed a significant 4-8% increase in several omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acid concentrations with the one-step method relative to the Folch. Overall, the findings reflect the utility of a one-step extraction method for routine and rapid monitoring of fatty acids in chicken and salmon. Inconsistencies in beef concentrations, although minor (within 11%), may be due to matrix effects.
A one-step fatty acid extraction method has broad applications for rapidly and routinely monitoring fatty acids in the food supply and formulating controlled dietary interventions.
脂肪酸提取方法既耗时又昂贵,因为它们涉及多个步骤和大量提取溶剂。为了简化脂肪酸提取过程,本研究将标准的福奇脂质提取方法与一种涉及选择性洗脱脂质相的柱的一步法进行了比较。这些方法在生牛肉、三文鱼和鸡肉上进行了测试。与标准福奇方法相比,一步提取过程在鸡肉和三文鱼脂肪酸浓度、百分比组成和重量百分比方面通常产生统计学上不显著的差异。初步测试表明,与福奇方法相比,一步法使牛肉硬脂酸、油酸和总脂肪酸浓度显著降低9 - 11%,但在另一批样品上重新测试显示,一步法使几种ω-3和ω-6脂肪酸浓度相对于福奇方法显著增加4 - 8%。总体而言,研究结果反映了一步提取方法在常规快速监测鸡肉和三文鱼脂肪酸方面的实用性。牛肉浓度的不一致性虽然较小(在11%以内),但可能是由于基质效应。
一步脂肪酸提取方法在快速常规监测食品供应中的脂肪酸以及制定可控饮食干预措施方面具有广泛应用。