Suppr超能文献

英格兰和北威尔士血液学单位中粒细胞输注的使用情况。

Use of granulocyte transfusions among haematology units in England and North Wales.

作者信息

Morton S, Mijovic A, Marks D I, Griffin J, Massey E, Bhatnagar N, Stanworth S J

机构信息

Medical Department, NHS Blood and Transplant, Birmingham, UK.

Department of Haematology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2018 Jun;28(3):243-248. doi: 10.1111/tme.12452. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish the current use of granulocyte transfusions in haematology patients and explore interest in further research.

BACKGROUND

Granulocytes may be used for the treatment of severe infection in neutropenic patients or for primary or secondary prophylaxis. Clinical utility of granulocyte transfusions is unclear, and recent studies have demonstrated equivocal outcomes. Pooled granulocytes are the main granulocyte product used in England and Wales, but there are no data on the patterns of use and little consensus on accepted indications.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to UK hospitals delivering intensive chemotherapy. Clinical scenarios were posed, with further questions on clinician experience of using granulocytes, availability of the product, barriers to use and interest in further research.

RESULTS

The response rate was 57%; 34·9% of all responses were from allogeneic stem cell transplant centres. Paediatric centres comprised 9·5% respondents, and 19% centres had access to apheresis granulocytes. Of respondents, 58·7% had used granulocytes in the last 3 years, 89·2% of whom used granulocytes to treat refractory infection. There was little consensus on use of granulocytes in the given clinical scenarios even when patients clearly met national guideline criteria. Paediatric centres were overall more likely to recommend granulocyte use. The most frequently identified barrier to use of granulocytes was lack of evidence of effect. Of the respondents, 75% indicated a willingness to participate in further research.

CONCLUSION

There remains a lack of consistency about use of granulocytes, which is unsurprising given the lack of clinical data to support their efficacy. We did, however, demonstrate a willingness to participate in further research.

摘要

目的

确定血液学患者中粒细胞输注的当前使用情况,并探索进一步研究的兴趣。

背景

粒细胞可用于治疗中性粒细胞减少患者的严重感染或用于一级或二级预防。粒细胞输注的临床效用尚不清楚,最近的研究结果也不明确。混合粒细胞是英格兰和威尔士使用的主要粒细胞产品,但关于使用模式的数据匮乏,且在公认的适应症方面几乎没有共识。

方法

向提供强化化疗的英国医院发放了一份调查问卷。提出了临床病例,并进一步询问了临床医生使用粒细胞的经验、产品的可获得性、使用障碍以及对进一步研究的兴趣。

结果

回复率为57%;所有回复中34.9%来自异基因干细胞移植中心。儿科中心占回复者的9.5%,19%的中心可获得单采粒细胞。在回复者中,58.7%在过去3年中使用过粒细胞,其中89.2%使用粒细胞治疗难治性感染。即使患者明显符合国家指南标准,在给定的临床病例中对粒细胞的使用也几乎没有共识。儿科中心总体上更倾向于推荐使用粒细胞。使用粒细胞最常被提及的障碍是缺乏疗效证据。在回复者中,75%表示愿意参与进一步研究。

结论

粒细胞的使用仍然缺乏一致性,鉴于缺乏支持其疗效的临床数据,这并不奇怪。然而,我们确实证明了参与进一步研究的意愿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验