Suppr超能文献

在磁体中进行测试:脑图标准化测试。

Taking tests in the magnet: Brain mapping standardized tests.

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

Center on Autobiographical Memory Research, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5706-5725. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23761. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

Abstract

Standardized psychometric tests are sophisticated, well-developed, and consequential instruments; test outcomes are taken as facts about people that impact their lives in important ways. As part of an initial demonstration that human brain mapping techniques can add converging neural-level evidence to understanding standardized tests, our participants completed items from standardized tests during an fMRI scan. We compared tests for diagnosing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the correlated measures of Neuroticism, Attachment, and Centrality of Event to a general-knowledge baseline test. Twenty-three trauma-exposed participants answered 20 items for each of our five tests in each of the three runs for a total of 60 items per test. The tests engaged different neural processes; which test a participant was taking was accurately predicted from other participants' brain activity. The novelty of the application precluded specific anatomical predictions; however, the interpretation of activated regions using meta-analyses produced encouraging results. For instance, items on the Attachment test engaged regions shown to be more active for tasks involving judgments of others than judgments of the self. The results are an initial demonstration of a theoretically and practically important test-taking neuroimaging paradigm and suggest specific neural processes in answering PTSD-related tests. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5706-5725, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

标准化心理测量工具是复杂、成熟且有重要影响的工具;测试结果被视为关于人的事实,以重要的方式影响他们的生活。作为人类大脑映射技术可以为理解标准化测试提供趋同神经水平证据的初步证明的一部分,我们的参与者在 fMRI 扫描期间完成了标准化测试的项目。我们将创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)诊断测试和神经质、依恋和事件中心的相关测量值与一般知识基准测试进行了比较。23 名创伤暴露参与者在每个测试的三个运行中的每个运行中回答了我们的五个测试中的每个测试的 20 个项目,每个测试共 60 个项目。这些测试涉及不同的神经过程;可以从其他参与者的大脑活动准确预测参与者正在进行的测试。该应用的新颖性排除了特定的解剖学预测;然而,使用荟萃分析对激活区域的解释产生了令人鼓舞的结果。例如,依恋测试的项目涉及到涉及他人判断的任务比自我判断的任务中更活跃的区域。这些结果是一种理论上和实践上都很重要的测试神经影像学范式的初步证明,并表明在回答与 PTSD 相关的测试时存在特定的神经过程。人类大脑映射 38:5706-5725,2017。©2017 威利期刊公司。

相似文献

1
Taking tests in the magnet: Brain mapping standardized tests.在磁体中进行测试:脑图标准化测试。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5706-5725. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23761. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Tracking resting state connectivity dynamics in veterans with PTSD.追踪 PTSD 退伍军人的静息态连接动力学。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 21;19:260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.014. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis.重度抑郁症中的心理理论:一项元分析。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Feb;191:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
The brain's default mode network.大脑的默认模式网络。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:433-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030. Epub 2015 May 4.
7
Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind.解构与重构心理理论
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Feb;19(2):65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
The neural basis of involuntary episodic memories.非自愿情景记忆的神经基础。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Oct;26(10):2385-99. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00633. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
The role of the midcingulate cortex in monitoring others' decisions.扣带前回在监控他人决策中的作用。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 20;7:251. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00251. eCollection 2013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验