Lim Eun Young, Yim Mi Kyoung, Huh Sun
Division of Educational Evaluation, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, Seoul, Korea.
Research and Development Division, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute, Seoul, Korea.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Apr 24;14:7. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.7. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to investigate respondents' satisfaction with smart device-based testing (SBT), as well as its convenience and advantages, in order to improve its implementation. The survey was conducted among 108 junior medical students at Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Korea, who took a practice licensing examination using SBT in September 2015. The survey contained 28 items scored using a 5-point Likert scale. The items were divided into the following three categories: satisfaction with SBT administration, convenience of SBT features, and advantages of SBT compared to paper-and-pencil testing or computer-based testing. The reliability of the survey was 0.95. Of the three categories, the convenience of the SBT features received the highest mean (M) score (M= 3.75, standard deviation [SD]= 0.69), while the category of satisfaction with SBT received the lowest (M= 3.13, SD= 1.07). No statistically significant differences across these categories with respect to sex, age, or experience were observed. These results indicate that SBT was practical and effective to take and to administer.
本研究旨在调查受访者对基于智能设备的测试（SBT）的满意度及其便利性和优势，以改进其实施情况。该调查在韩国庆北国立大学医学院的108名低年级医学生中进行，这些学生于2015年9月参加了使用SBT的实践执照考试。该调查包含28个项目，采用5点李克特量表评分。这些项目分为以下三类：对SBT管理的满意度、SBT功能的便利性以及与纸笔测试或基于计算机的测试相比SBT的优势。该调查的信度为0.95。在这三类中，SBT功能的便利性获得了最高的平均（M）得分（M = 3.75，标准差[SD] = 0.69），而对SBT的满意度类别得分最低（M = 3.13，SD = 1.07）。在这些类别中，未观察到性别、年龄或经验方面的统计学显著差异。这些结果表明，SBT在实施和使用方面是切实可行且有效的。
