Suppr超能文献

[龈下甘氨酸空气抛光对早期种植体周围疾病患者的疗效]

[Efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing on patients with early peri-implant diseases].

作者信息

Jing W D, Wang X E, Xie Y S, Han J, Xu L

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 9;52(8):480-485. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.08.007.

Abstract

To compare the clinical efficacies of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing on patients with early peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and early peri-implantitis). Twenty-two systemically healthy patients with totally 42 implants and early peri-implant diseases, were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the test group and the control group. Patients in the test group were treated with subgingival glycine air polishing and patients in the control group were treated with ultrasonic scalers combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing. Periodontal parameters such as probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and clinical attachment loss, at baseline and 2 months after treatment, respectively, were collected and compared between the test and control groups. For the natural teeth, the parameters of probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and attachment loss in the two groups were significantly improved after treatments (medians were 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, 1.00 vs-0.13, 0.38 vs 0.50, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, respectively for test and control group). There was no statistical difference of median between the two groups after treatment except for that of the attachment loss (medians, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, 0.034). For the implants, differences of parameters in the two groups at baseline were insignificant. After treatments, the probing depths significantly decreased by 0.67 mm and 0.33 mm in the test group and the control group, respectively. The inter-group differences, however, were insignificant. Significant difference of the bleeding index after treatment was found in the test group (0.019), but not in the control group. No adverse reactions were found on patients in the two groups after treatments. Efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing is competitive on patients with early peri-implant diseases. However, the former treatment may be more effective oncontrolling the early peri-implant inflammation.

摘要

比较龈下甘氨酸空气抛光与超声龈上洁治联合0.12%氯己定含漱对早期种植体周围疾病(种植体周围黏膜炎和早期种植体周围炎)患者的临床疗效。本研究纳入了22例全身健康、共有42颗种植体且患有早期种植体周围疾病的患者。将患者随机分为试验组和对照组。试验组患者接受龈下甘氨酸空气抛光治疗,对照组患者接受超声龈上洁治联合0.12%氯己定含漱治疗。分别收集试验组和对照组在基线时及治疗后2个月时的牙周参数,如探诊深度、出血指数、菌斑指数和临床附着丧失,并进行比较。对于天然牙,两组治疗后的探诊深度、出血指数、菌斑指数和附着丧失参数均有显著改善(试验组和对照组的中位数分别为0.48mm对0.22mm、1.00对-0.13、0.38对0.50、0.48mm对0.22mm)。除附着丧失外,两组治疗后的中位数无统计学差异(中位数,0.48mm对0.22mm,P=0.034)。对于种植体,两组基线时参数差异无统计学意义。治疗后,试验组和对照组的探诊深度分别显著降低了0.67mm和0.33mm。然而,组间差异无统计学意义。试验组治疗后的出血指数有显著差异(P=0.019),而对照组无显著差异。两组患者治疗后均未发现不良反应。龈下甘氨酸空气抛光与超声龈上洁治联合0.12%氯己定含漱对早期种植体周围疾病患者的疗效相当。然而,前一种治疗方法在控制早期种植体周围炎症方面可能更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验