Zhao Y B, Jin D S S, He L, Meng H X
Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 9;52(7):410-414. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.07.004.
To research the variation of subgingival microorganisms after 65 μm glycine powder air-polishing (GPAP) in patients with periodontitis during periodontal maintenance phase and make comparison with conventional method. From Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, twenty-one patients at the age of 35-72 (8 males and 13 females) who were systematically healthy were recruited in this study. According to splitting-mouth design, one side of a mouth was randomly assigned to the experiment group (21 patients, 248 teeth, 1 488 sites) with 65 μm GPAP therapy while the opposite side served as the control group (21 patients, 249 teeth, 1 494 sites) with ultrasonic scaling plus polishing paste therapy. The clinical periodontal parameters including probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and plaque index (PLI) were recorded. Using sterile currette, the subgingival plaque samples were collected at the mesio-buccal site of the first or second molars at baseline, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after therapy, respectively. After Congo red staining, the microorganisms were classified into cocci, bacilli and spirochetes and counted respectively. All clinical periodontal parameters have no difference between two groups at baseline and after treatment 12 weeks. In the experiment group and the control group, PD ([2.33±0.90] and [2.37±1.18] mm), BI (0.96±0.70 and 0.98±0.78) and PLI (0.00[1.00] and 0.00[1.00]) of two groups after treatment 12 weeks were better than those at baseline (PD: [2.48±1.17] and [2.46±0.99] mm; BI: 1.07±0.72 and 1.08±0.75; PLI: 0.00 [1.00] and 0.00 [1.00]) (0.05). But BOP(+)% was observably reduced only in the control group after treatment 12 weeks ([17.25±2.21]% vs [25.23±2.83]%) (0.05). The percentages of cocci, bacilli and spirochetes were stable and there were not significant differences between the two groups (>0.05). After 65 μm GPAP therapy, the differences of proportion of subgingival microorganisms are not significant, while the control group has the same trend. The spirochetes remained at a low level, but they rebounded fasterly in the test group than that in the control group. The results indicate that 65 μm glycine powder air-polishing has the similar clinical effects compared with ultrasonic scaling plus polishing paste. However, the clinical indications should be limited to the patients with shallow pockets and without obvious dental calculus.
研究牙周炎患者牙周维护期经65μm甘氨酸粉末喷砂抛光(GPAP)后龈下微生物的变化,并与传统方法进行比较。选取北京大学口腔医学院牙周科21例年龄35 - 72岁(男8例,女13例)全身健康的患者。根据自身对照设计,一侧口腔随机分为实验组(21例患者,248颗牙,1488个位点),采用65μm GPAP治疗;另一侧作为对照组(21例患者,249颗牙,1494个位点),采用超声洁治加抛光膏治疗。记录临床牙周参数,包括探诊深度(PD)、出血指数(BI)、探诊出血(BOP)和菌斑指数(PLI)。分别在基线、治疗后2、4、8和12周,使用无菌刮匙在第一或第二磨牙的近中颊侧位点采集龈下菌斑样本。刚果红染色后,将微生物分为球菌、杆菌和螺旋体并分别计数。两组在基线和治疗12周后所有临床牙周参数均无差异。实验组和对照组治疗12周后的PD([2.33±0.90]和[2.37±1.18]mm)、BI(0.96±0.70和0.98±0.78)和PLI(0.00[1.00]和0.00[1.00])均优于基线时(PD:[2.48±1.17]和[2.46±0.99]mm;BI:1.07±0.72和1.08±0.75;PLI:0.00 [1.00]和0.00 [1.00])(P>0.05)。但仅对照组治疗12周后BOP(+)%明显降低([17.25±2.21]% vs [25.23±2.83]%)(P<0.05)。球菌、杆菌和螺旋体的百分比稳定,两组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。65μm GPAP治疗后,龈下微生物比例差异不显著,对照组也有相同趋势。螺旋体维持在较低水平,但试验组比对照组回升更快。结果表明,65μm甘氨酸粉末喷砂抛光与超声洁治加抛光膏具有相似的临床效果。然而,临床适应证应限于浅袋且无明显牙结石患者。