• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

涉及儿童的试验方案数量和质量的趋势,提交给法国机构审查委员会。

Trends in the number and the quality of trial protocols involving children submitted to a French Institutional Review Board.

机构信息

Centre d'investigation Clinique Pédiatrique, INSERM CIC 9502, Hôpital d'Enfants de la Timone, AP-HM, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France.

EA3279 - Santé Publique: Maladies Chroniques et Qualité de Vie, Aix-Marseille Université, 13385, Marseille, France.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0395-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-017-0395-4
PMID:28835231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5569539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a great need for high quality clinical research for children. The European Pediatric Regulation aimed to improve the quality of clinical trials in order to increase the availability of treatments for children. The main purpose of this study was to assess the evolution of both the number and the quality of pediatric trial protocols that were submitted to a French Institutional Review Board (IRB00009118) before and after the initiation of the EU Pediatric Regulation.

METHODS

All protocols submitted to the IRB00009118 between 2003 and 2014 and conducting research on subjects under eighteen years of age were eligible. The quality of randomized clinical trials was assessed according to the guidelines developed by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and ranked using the Jadad score.

RESULTS

Out of 622 protocols submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), 21% (133/622) included children. Among these 133 pediatric protocols, the number of submitted pediatric protocols doubled between the two studied periods. From 2003 to 2008, 47 protocols including 21 institutionally sponsored were submitted to the IRB and from 2009 until 2014, 86 protocols including 48 institutionally sponsored were submitted. No significant trend was observed on the quality of RCTs. The overall median score of RCTs on the Jadad scale was high (3.5), 70.0% of protocols had a Jadad score ≥ 3, and 30.0% had a score < 3.

CONCLUSION

Following the EU Pediatric Regulation, the number of pediatric protocols submitted to the IRB00009118 tends to increase, but no change was noticed regarding their quality.

摘要

背景

儿童非常需要高质量的临床研究。欧洲儿科法规旨在提高临床试验的质量,以便为儿童提供更多的治疗方法。本研究的主要目的是评估在欧盟儿科法规启动前后,向法国机构审查委员会(IRB00009118)提交的儿科试验方案的数量和质量的演变。

方法

所有在 2003 年至 2014 年间提交给 IRB00009118 并针对十八岁以下受试者进行研究的方案都符合条件。根据增强健康研究质量和透明度(EQUATOR)网络制定的指南评估随机临床试验的质量,并使用 Jadad 评分进行排名。

结果

在提交给机构审查委员会(IRB)的 622 项方案中,有 21%(133/622)包括儿童。在这 133 项儿科方案中,提交的儿科方案数量在两个研究期间翻了一番。2003 年至 2008 年期间,向 IRB 提交了 47 项方案,其中 21 项由机构赞助;2009 年至 2014 年期间,提交了 86 项方案,其中 48 项由机构赞助。未观察到 RCT 质量的显著趋势。Jadad 量表上 RCT 的总体中位数评分为高(3.5),70.0%的方案得分为≥3,30.0%的方案得分为<3。

结论

在欧盟儿科法规之后,向 IRB00009118 提交的儿科方案数量呈上升趋势,但质量没有变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/5569539/cbe19a01015b/12874_2017_395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/5569539/d670e5a81212/12874_2017_395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/5569539/cbe19a01015b/12874_2017_395_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/5569539/d670e5a81212/12874_2017_395_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a868/5569539/cbe19a01015b/12874_2017_395_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in the number and the quality of trial protocols involving children submitted to a French Institutional Review Board.涉及儿童的试验方案数量和质量的趋势,提交给法国机构审查委员会。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0395-4.
2
The efficiency of single institutional review board review in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network-initiated clinical trials.国立儿童健康与人类发展合作生育医学网发起的临床试验中单机构审查委员会审查的效率。
Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/1740774518807888. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
Completeness of protocols for clinical trials in children submitted to ethics committees.提交给伦理委员会的儿童临床试验方案的完整性。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Mar;55(3):291-298. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14189. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
4
Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany--results and a comparison of two surveys performed among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa).德国伦理委员会对临床试验的评估——德国研发型制药企业协会(vfa)成员两项调查的结果及比较
Ger Med Sci. 2015 Jan 27;13:Doc02. doi: 10.3205/000206. eCollection 2015.
5
How good does the science have to be in proposals submitted to Institutional Review Boards? An interview study of Institutional Review Board personnel.提交给机构审查委员会的提案中的科学内容要达到多好的水平?一项对机构审查委员会人员的访谈研究。
Clin Trials. 2013 Oct;10(5):761-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774513500080. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
6
Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: lessons learned from developing a multicenter regional institutional review board.安大略癌症研究伦理委员会:建立多中心区域机构审查委员会的经验教训。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1479-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6441.
7
[Clinical trials with minors in Germany--effects of the 12th amendment to the German Drug Code on the numbers of applications to Institutional Review Boards (IRB)].[德国针对未成年人的临床试验——《德国药品法典》第12次修订对向机构审查委员会(IRB)提交申请数量的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Mar;71(3):127-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103279. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Inconsistency and institutional review boards.不一致性与机构审查委员会。
JAMA. 1982 Jul 9;248(2):197-202.
10
Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.机构审查委员会对一项标准的、观察性的儿科研究方案的反应差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):377-80. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.031. Epub 2007 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Descriptive study of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care pediatric hospital in México from 2014 to 2017.2014 年至 2017 年墨西哥一家三级儿科医院药物不良反应的描述性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 24;15(3):e0230576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230576. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantages of a Truly Open-Access Data-Sharing Model.真正开放获取的数据共享模式的优势。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 23;376(12):1178-1181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1702054.
2
Sharing Clinical Trial Data: A Proposal From the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.共享临床试验数据:来自国际医学期刊编辑委员会的一项提议
JAMA. 2016 Feb 2;315(5):467-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18164.
3
Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013.
全球临床试验注册趋势:对2004年至2013年世界不同地区注册临床试验数量的分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 25;5(9):e008932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008932.
4
Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.儿科临床试验方案和报告中报告项目的建议与证据:两项系统评价
Trials. 2015 Sep 18;16:417. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0954-0.
5
The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Are We Improving?小儿骨科随机对照试验的质量:我们是否在进步?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5):536-45. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000324.
6
The EU paediatric regulation: still a large discrepancy between therapeutic needs and approved paediatric investigation plans.欧盟儿科规定:治疗需求与批准的儿科研究计划之间仍存在较大差距。
Paediatr Drugs. 2014 Oct;16(5):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0082-4.
7
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.提高研究设计、实施和分析的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
9
Clinical trials in children.儿童临床试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;79(3):357-69. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12305.
10
Randomized controlled trial quality in pediatric physical therapy.随机对照试验在儿科物理治疗中的质量。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014 Aug;34(3):260-70. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2013.827142. Epub 2013 Aug 29.