• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fuhrman 分级和年龄对乳头状肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性和总体生存的预后意义:2189 例患者国际多机构研究的结果。

Prognostic significance of Fuhrman grade and age for cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: results of an international multi-institutional study on 2189 patients.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1891-1897. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2078-5. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-017-2078-5
PMID:28836063
Abstract

PURPOSE

Because the prognostic impact of the clinical and pathological features on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC) is still controversial, we want to assess the impact of clinicopathological features, including Fuhrman grade and age, on survival in surgically treated papRCC patients in a large multi-institutional series.

METHODS

We established a comprehensive multi-institutional database of surgically treated papRCC patients. Histopathological data collected from 2189 patients with papRCC after radical nephrectomy or nephron-sparing surgery were pooled from 18 centres in Europe and North America. OS and CSS probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable competing risks analyses were used to assess the impact of Fuhrman grade (FG1-FG4) and age groups (<50 years, 50-75 years, >75 years) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM).

RESULTS

CSS and OS rates for patients were 89 and 81% at 3 years, 86 and 75% at 5 years and 78 and 41% at 10 years after surgery, respectively. CSM differed significantly between FG 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-8.22; p < 0.001) and FG 4 (HR 8.93, 95% CI 4.25-18.79; p < 0.001) in comparison to FG 1. CSM was significantly worse in patients aged >75 (HR 2.85, 95% CI 2.06-3.95; p < 0.001) compared to <50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

FG is a strong prognostic factor for CSS in papRCC patients. In addition, patients older than 75 have worse CSM than patients younger than 50 years. These findings should be considered for clinical decision making.

摘要

目的

由于临床和病理特征对乳头状肾细胞癌(papRCC)患者癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)的预后影响仍存在争议,我们希望在一个大型多机构系列中评估包括 Fuhrman 分级和年龄在内的临床病理特征对接受手术治疗的 papRCC 患者生存的影响。

方法

我们建立了一个综合的多机构接受手术治疗的 papRCC 患者数据库。从欧洲和北美的 18 个中心收集了 2189 例接受根治性肾切除术或肾部分切除术的 papRCC 患者的组织病理学数据。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计 OS 和 CSS 概率。使用多变量竞争风险分析评估 Fuhrman 分级(FG1-FG4)和年龄组(<50 岁、50-75 岁、>75 岁)对癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)的影响。

结果

手术后 3 年、5 年和 10 年,患者的 CSS 和 OS 率分别为 89%和 81%、86%和 75%以及 78%和 41%。与 FG1 相比,FG3(危险比[HR]4.22,95%置信区间[CI]2.17-8.22;p<0.001)和 FG4(HR8.93,95%CI4.25-18.79;p<0.001)的 CSM 差异有统计学意义。与<50 岁的患者相比,年龄>75 岁的患者的 CSM 显著更差(HR2.85,95%CI2.06-3.95;p<0.001)。

结论

FG 是 papRCC 患者 CSS 的一个强有力的预后因素。此外,年龄大于 75 岁的患者比年龄小于 50 岁的患者 CSM 更差。这些发现应在临床决策中考虑。

相似文献

1
Prognostic significance of Fuhrman grade and age for cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: results of an international multi-institutional study on 2189 patients.Fuhrman 分级和年龄对乳头状肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性和总体生存的预后意义:2189 例患者国际多机构研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1891-1897. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2078-5. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
Predicting Oncologic Outcomes in Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgery.预测肾细胞癌手术后的肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):772-780. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
3
Prognostic and discriminative power of the 7th TNM classification for patients with surgically treated papillary renal cell carcinoma: results of a multi-institutional validation study (CORONA subtype project).第7版TNM分类对手术治疗的乳头状肾细胞癌患者的预后及鉴别能力:一项多机构验证研究(CORONA亚型项目)的结果
Scand J Urol. 2017 Aug;51(4):269-276. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1300187. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Features associated with recurrence beyond 5 years after nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: development and internal validation of a risk model (PRELANE score) to predict late recurrence based on a large multicenter database (CORONA/SATURN Project).肾细胞癌肾切除术后 5 年以上复发相关特征:基于大型多中心数据库(CORONA/SATURN 项目)开发和内部验证预测晚期复发的风险模型(PRELANE 评分)。
Eur Urol. 2013 Sep;64(3):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.030. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
5
Critical analysis of a simplified Fuhrman grading scheme for prediction of cancer specific mortality in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--Impact on prognosis.对一种简化的福尔曼分级方案预测透明细胞肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性死亡率的批判性分析——对预后的影响
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;42(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.09.023. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Organ Preservation Is Less Frequently Performed in Women Surgically Treated for Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma-Results of a Comprehensive Multicenter Study.在接受手术治疗的乳头状肾细胞癌女性患者中,器官保留术的实施频率较低——一项综合性多中心研究的结果
Urology. 2017 Nov;109:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.042. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
Prognostic implications of sarcomatoid and rhabdoid differentiation in patients with grade 4 renal cell carcinoma.4级肾细胞癌患者中肉瘤样和横纹肌样分化的预后意义
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Aug;48(8):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1314-z. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
The prognostic role of histomorphological subtyping in nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma after curative surgery: is subtype really irrelevant? A propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institutional real life data.根治性手术后非转移性乳头状肾细胞癌的组织形态亚型预后作用:亚型真的无关紧要吗?多机构真实数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Urol Oncol. 2024 May;42(5):163.e1-163.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.028. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
9
Papillary renal cell carcinoma: correlation of tumor grade and histologic characteristics with clinical outcome.乳头状肾细胞癌:肿瘤分级和组织学特征与临床结局的相关性
Hum Pathol. 2015 Oct;46(10):1411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
10
Microvascular and lymphovascular tumour invasion are associated with poor prognosis and metastatic spread in renal cell carcinoma: a validation study in clinical practice.微血管和淋巴管肿瘤浸润与肾细胞癌的不良预后和转移扩散相关:一项临床实践中的验证研究
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):84-92. doi: 10.1111/bju.13984. Epub 2017 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma versus high-grade papillary renal cell carcinoma.富马酸水合酶缺陷型肾细胞癌与高级别乳头状肾细胞癌的临床病理特征及预后结果的比较分析
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Aug 30;14(8):2195-2206. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-255. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
2
Preoperative prediction of WHO/ISUP grade of ccRCC using intratumoral and peritumoral habitat imaging: multicenter study.利用肿瘤内和肿瘤周围生境成像对透明细胞肾细胞癌的WHO/ISUP分级进行术前预测:多中心研究
Cancer Imaging. 2025 May 3;25(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00875-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The subclassification of papillary renal cell carcinoma does not affect oncological outcomes after nephron sparing surgery.肾乳头状细胞癌的亚分类不影响保留肾单位手术后的肿瘤学结局。
World J Urol. 2016 Mar;34(3):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1634-0. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
2
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
3
Results of a comparative study analyzing octogenarians with renal cell carcinoma in a competing risk analysis with patients in the seventh decade of life.
Development and validation of prognostic nomograms for adult with papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study.
开发和验证成人肾乳头状细胞癌预后列线图:一项回顾性研究。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 May 7;79:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100374. eCollection 2024.
4
A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival and overall survival in elderly patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.用于预测老年非转移性肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性生存率和总生存率的列线图。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1018579. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1018579. eCollection 2022.
5
Prospective evaluation of hematological parameters in preoperative renal cell cancer patients.术前肾细胞癌患者血液学参数的前瞻性评估。
BMC Urol. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01118-0.
6
Machine learning-based prognosis signature for survival prediction of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.基于机器学习的透明细胞肾细胞癌患者生存预测预后特征
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 11;8(9):e10578. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10578. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
A Web-Based Prediction Model for Cancer-Specific Survival of Elderly Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.基于网络的老年透明细胞肾细胞癌患者癌症特异性生存预测模型:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 3;9:833970. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.833970. eCollection 2021.
8
The first competing risk survival nomogram in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.首个用于预测乳头状肾细胞癌患者的竞争风险生存诺莫图。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 4;11(1):11835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91217-z.
9
Prognostic effect of renal collecting system invasion on survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma and tumor thrombus.肾集合系统侵犯对肾细胞癌伴肿瘤血栓患者生存的预后影响。
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):280-286. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0172. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
10
Comparison of clinicopathologic parameters and oncologic outcomes between type 1 and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma.比较 1 型和 2 型乳头状肾细胞癌的临床病理参数和肿瘤学结局。
BMC Urol. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00716-0.
一项比较研究的结果,该研究在竞争风险分析中,对八旬肾癌患者与七十岁患者进行了分析。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1252-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in urologic pathology: report from the International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference.在泌尿病理应用免疫组织化学中的最佳实践建议:国际泌尿病理学会共识会议的报告。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Aug;38(8):1017-22. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000254.
5
The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters.国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)肾细胞癌分级系统及其他预后参数。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Oct;37(10):1490-504. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f0fb.
6
The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia.国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)温哥华肾脏肿瘤分类。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Oct;37(10):1469-89. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2d1.
7
Do young patients with renal cell carcinoma feature a distinct outcome after surgery? A comparative analysis of patient age based on the multinational CORONA database.年轻的肾细胞癌患者手术后的结局是否不同?基于多国 CORONA 数据库的患者年龄比较分析。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):310-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
8
Incidence and long-term prognosis of papillary compared to clear cell renal cell carcinoma--a multicentre study.与透明细胞肾细胞癌相比,乳头状肾细胞癌的发病率和长期预后——一项多中心研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Oct;48(15):2347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
9
Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.透明细胞肾细胞癌的分级应基于核仁明显度。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Aug;35(8):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318220697f.
10
Young age as favorable prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival in localized renal cell carcinoma.在局限性肾细胞癌中,年龄较轻是癌症特异性生存的有利预后因素。
Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):842-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.062. Epub 2011 Jan 22.