Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病伴低血糖意识受损患者的连续血糖监测:对心理困扰患者也有效?

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia: Also Effective in Patients with Psychological Distress?

机构信息

1 Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands .

2 Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam, The Netherlands .

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Oct;19(10):595-599. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0141. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether psychological distress modifies the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Fifty-two patients with T1D and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia participated in an earlier reported randomized crossover trial with two 16-week intervention periods comparing CGM with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). During the CGM phase, time spent in euglycemia (4-10 mmol/L), the primary outcome, was 9.6% higher compared with the SMBG phase (P < 0.0001). Psychological distress was operationalized as low emotional well-being (World Health Organization Well-being Index 5 [WHO-5] < 50), high diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes 5 [PAID-5] ≥ 8), and/or high fear of hypoglycemia (Hypoglycemia Fear Survey [HFS] Worry > mean HFS Worry score +1 standard deviation). Modifying effects were assessed by analyzing psychological distress score × intervention-interaction effects. Results showed that both the low emotional well-being group and normal emotional well-being group had equal glycemic outcomes during the CGM phase. High diabetes distress and elevated fear of hypoglycemia did not result in significant interaction effects for glycemic outcomes. This study demonstrated that CGM is equally effective in terms of glycemic improvements in high versus low distressed patients with T1D and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.

摘要

本研究旨在评估心理困扰是否会改变连续血糖监测(CGM)对 1 型糖尿病(T1D)和低血糖感知受损患者的疗效。52 名 T1D 合并低血糖感知受损的患者参加了一项先前报道的随机交叉试验,该试验比较了 CGM 与自我血糖监测(SMBG),有两个 16 周的干预期。在 CGM 阶段,与 SMBG 阶段相比,血糖处于正常范围(4-10mmol/L)的时间增加了 9.6%(P<0.0001)。心理困扰的操作定义为情绪健康状况较低(世界卫生组织幸福感指数 5[WHO-5] < 50)、糖尿病相关困扰较高(糖尿病问题领域量表 5[PAID-5] ≥ 8)和/或低血糖恐惧较高(低血糖恐惧量表[HFS]担心 >平均 HFS 担心得分+1 标准差)。通过分析心理困扰评分×干预相互作用效应来评估调节效应。结果表明,在 CGM 阶段,低情绪健康组和正常情绪健康组的血糖控制结果相当。高糖尿病困扰和高低血糖恐惧并未导致血糖结果出现显著的交互效应。本研究表明,在 T1D 和低血糖感知受损的高和低心理困扰患者中,CGM 在改善血糖方面同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验