Parveen Zainab, Sadiq Maqsood, Abbas Faisal, Amir-Ud-Din Rafi
Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Senior Program Officer, Population Council Islamabad, Pakistan.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Aug;67(8):1166-1172.
To identify the socio-economic determinants of home-based and institutional delivery in Pakistan.
This study has used Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS) data collected by the National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS), Islamabad, Pakistan, and Macro International Inc. (now ICF International) Calverton, Maryland, United States. It used three episodes of Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey Data from 1990-91, 2006-07 and 2012-13. Data was analysed using descriptive analysis and odds of delivering at hospital were calculated using logistic regression analysis.
Home-based delivery was over 4 times higher in 1990-91 compared with institutional delivery 5,465(85.3%) vs. 852(13.3%), and around 2 times higher in 2006-07 5,900(64.7%) vs. 3,128(34.3%). However, in 2012-13, the share of women delivering at home or health facility was roughly the same, i.e. 6,180(51.6%) at home and 5,773(48.2%) at health facility.
There were wide gaps in the rates of institutional delivery among different subgroups, and they were accentuated by the socio-economic and financial disparities, and high illiteracy rates in the lowest wealth quintiles.
确定巴基斯坦家庭分娩和机构分娩的社会经济决定因素。
本研究使用了由巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡国家人口研究所(NIPS)以及美国马里兰州卡尔弗顿的Macro International Inc.(现为ICF International)收集的巴基斯坦人口与健康调查(PDHS)数据。研究采用了1990 - 1991年、2006 - 2007年和2012 - 2013年三个阶段的巴基斯坦人口与健康调查数据。使用描述性分析对数据进行分析,并通过逻辑回归分析计算在医院分娩的几率。
1990 - 1991年家庭分娩率比机构分娩率高出4倍多,分别为5465例(85.3%)和852例(13.3%);2006 - 2007年家庭分娩率约为机构分娩率的2倍,分别为5900例(64.7%)和3128例(34.3%)。然而,在2012 - 2013年,在家中或医疗机构分娩的女性比例大致相同,即在家中分娩的有6180例(51.6%),在医疗机构分娩的有5773例(48.2%)。
不同亚组之间的机构分娩率存在巨大差距,且这些差距因社会经济和财政差异以及最贫困五分位数人群的高文盲率而加剧。