• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effect of Hand Dominance on Functional Outcome Following Single Row Rotator Cuff Repair.单手优势对单排肩袖修复术后功能结果的影响。
Open Orthop J. 2017 Jul 25;11:562-566. doi: 10.2174/1874325001611010562. eCollection 2017.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
3
Rotator Cuff Repair in Adolescent Athletes.青少年运动员肩袖修复术。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1084-1090. doi: 10.1177/0363546517752919. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
4
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂单排和双排修复的临床结果比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):1310-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546508315039. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
5
Functional outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic repair.关节镜修复术后创伤性和非创伤性肩袖撕裂的功能预后
World J Orthop. 2017 Aug 18;8(8):631-637. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i8.631.
6
Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study.单排与双排关节镜下肩袖修补术:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.018. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
7
Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears.采用双排固定技术的小切口肩袖修补术:小、中、大型肩袖撕裂患者的疗效分析
Arthroscopy. 2002 Jul-Aug;18(6):665-70. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.32589.
8
High-grade bursal-side partial rotator cuff tears: comparison of mid- and long-term results following arthroscopic repair after conversion to a full-thickness tear.高度肩峰下滑囊侧部分肩袖撕裂:在转变为全层撕裂后关节镜修复的中期和长期结果比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jul 21;12(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0619-7.
9
All-Suture Anchor Settling After Arthroscopic Repair of Small and Medium Rotator Cuff Tears.关节镜下修复小中型肩袖撕裂术后全缝线锚定物沉降
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3483-3490. doi: 10.1177/0363546519886547. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Fatty degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair: does it improve, halt or deteriorate?关节镜修复术后肩袖肌肉的脂肪变性和萎缩:是改善、停止还是恶化?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Jul;134(7):985-90. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2009-5. Epub 2014 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improves functional outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.单排关节镜下肩袖修补术在至少3年的随访中可改善功能预后。
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Apr 15;5(3):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.03.010. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Does hand dominance influence clinical outcomes and implant survival in shoulder arthroplasty?利手是否会影响肩关节置换术的临床疗效及植入物存活率?
J Orthop. 2024 Nov 2;64:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.052. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The Influence of Hand Dominance in Wrist Fracture Post-Operative Functional Evaluation.手部优势对腕部骨折术后功能评估的影响
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021 Nov;29(4):250-256. doi: 10.1177/2292550320933693. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂危险因素的系统评价
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499016684318. doi: 10.1177/2309499016684318.
2
Review article: Risk factors for poor outcome following surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Aug;24(2):265-8. doi: 10.1177/1602400229.
3
The ability of preoperative factors to predict patient-reported disability following surgery for rotator cuff pathology.术前因素预测肩袖病变手术后患者报告的功能障碍的能力。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(20):2087-2096. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219396. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Clinician and Patient-reported Outcomes Are Associated With Psychological Factors in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain.临床医生和患者报告的结果与慢性肩痛患者的心理因素相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2030-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4894-0. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Treatment of Nontraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Two Years of Clinical and Imaging Follow-up.非创伤性肩袖撕裂的治疗:一项为期两年的临床和影像学随访的随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 4;97(21):1729-37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01051.
6
Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial.比较手术修复与保守治疗退变性肩袖撕裂:一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.040.
7
Tendon repair compared with physiotherapy in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study in 103 cases with a five-year follow-up.肩袖撕裂伤的治疗中肌腱修复与物理治疗的比较:103 例 5 年随访的随机对照研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 17;96(18):1504-14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01393.
8
Effect of immobilization without passive exercise after rotator cuff repair: randomized clinical trial comparing four and eight weeks of immobilization.肩袖修复后不进行被动运动固定的效果:比较固定 4 周和 8 周的随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 19;96(6):e44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01741.
9
Treatment of non-traumatic rotator cuff tears: A randomised controlled trial with one-year clinical results.非创伤性肩袖撕裂的治疗:一项具有一年临床结果的随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jan;96-B(1):75-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32168.
10
Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears.肩袖撕裂的流行病学、自然史和治疗适应证。
Clin Sports Med. 2012 Oct;31(4):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

单手优势对单排肩袖修复术后功能结果的影响。

The Effect of Hand Dominance on Functional Outcome Following Single Row Rotator Cuff Repair.

作者信息

Kelly Michael A, Mc Donald Ciarán K, Boland Aidan, Groarke Patrick J, Kaar Ken

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, UCH Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Biomedical Statistics, UCD, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Open Orthop J. 2017 Jul 25;11:562-566. doi: 10.2174/1874325001611010562. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2174/1874325001611010562
PMID:28839501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5543698/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of shoulder disability and pain. Excellent outcomes can be obtained with surgical treatment although this outcome is affected by several factors. We sought to investigate the effect of hand dominance on subjective functional outcome post rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

All patients who had rotator cuff repair over a calendar year were identified and followed up at 3 years post operatively. Patients were consented for inclusion in the study and demographic data, hand dominance and functional outcome data was collected. L'insalata shoulder questionnaire was used for outcome data collection. SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis where appropriate.

RESULTS

144 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 63 +/- 10.1 years in the dominant side group and 62 +/- 8.6 years in the non-dominant group. 92 patients had dominant side surgery and 52 had non-dominant side surgery. There was a statistically significant correlation between dominant hand and operated side (P=0.005). The mean overall outcome score was marginally higher in the dominant surgery group with a mean of 89.8 +/- 14.2 compared with a mean of 87.4 +/- 17.5 in the non-dominant group. Multi-variate linear regression analysis revealed this difference to be non-significant (p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

No difference was found in the functional outcome of rotator cuff repair between dominant and non-dominant side surgery. This information will help in counselling patients who are concerned about the potential impact of rotator cuff repair on the function of their dominant hand.

摘要

引言

肩袖撕裂是导致肩部功能障碍和疼痛的常见原因。尽管手术治疗的效果会受到多种因素的影响,但仍可获得良好的治疗效果。我们旨在研究利手对肩袖修复术后主观功能结局的影响。

方法

确定在一个日历年中接受肩袖修复的所有患者,并在术后3年进行随访。患者同意纳入本研究,并收集人口统计学数据、利手情况和功能结局数据。使用L'insalata肩部问卷收集结局数据。在适当情况下,使用SPSS 22版进行统计分析。

结果

本研究共纳入144例患者。优势侧组的平均年龄为63±10.1岁,非优势侧组为62±8.6岁。92例患者接受了优势侧手术,52例接受了非优势侧手术。优势手与手术侧之间存在统计学显著相关性(P = 0.005)。优势侧手术组的平均总体结局评分略高,平均为89.8±14.2,而非优势侧组的平均评分为87.4±17.5。多变量线性回归分析显示这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.4)。

结论

优势侧和非优势侧手术的肩袖修复功能结局未发现差异。该信息将有助于为担心肩袖修复对其优势手功能潜在影响的患者提供咨询。