• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠道清洁影响评估(BOCLIR)的开发与验证

Development and validation of the Bowel Cleansing Impact Review (BOCLIR).

作者信息

Doward Lynda, Wilburn Jeanette, McKenna Stephen P, Leicester Roger, Epstein Owen, Hedley Vicki, Korala Sanjeeva, Twiss James, Jones Deborah, Geraint Mike

机构信息

Galen Research Ltd, Manchester, UK.

Department of Endoscopy, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;4(2):112-119. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100278. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1136/flgastro-2012-100278
PMID:28839711
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5369806/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acceptability and tolerability of bowel cleansers influence whether patients are able to complete the prescribed dose and, consequently, the quality of the cleansing achieved. No standardised means of assessing patients' experience of using bowel cleansing is currently available. The aim of the study was to develop the Bowel Cleansing Impact Review (BOCLIR) to assess patient response to bowel cleansing products.

DESIGN

Content was derived from qualitative interviews. Face and content validity were assessed via cognitive-debriefing interviews. Finally, patients completed the BOCLIR and a demographic questionnaire. Item response theory (Rasch analysis) was employed for item reduction and assessment of unidimensionality. Internal consistency and construct validity were also assessed.

RESULTS

Analysis of 40 interviews resulted in the production of three scales; patient satisfaction, symptomatic impact and activity limitations. Scales were designed to be used alone or together. 19 debriefing interviews demonstrated BOCLIR acceptability, relevance and ease of completion. The validation survey involved 166 patients (52% male, mean (SD) age 54.3 (15.2) years). After misfitting and redundant items were removed all scales fit the Rasch model confirming their unidimensionality. Cronbach's α-coefficients were high (0.77-0.94) indicating good internal consistency. Scores on the BOCLIR were related to patients' willingness to use the product in future and ease of drinking the full preparation (p<0.01 for each scale).

CONCLUSIONS

The BOCLIR is a new measure consisting of three unidimensional scales (satisfaction, symptoms and activity limitations) with good psychometric and scaling properties. The BOCLIR will allow accurate assessment of patients' response to bowel cleansing preparations.

摘要

目的

肠道清洁剂的可接受性和耐受性会影响患者是否能够完成规定剂量,进而影响清洁效果的质量。目前尚无标准化的方法来评估患者使用肠道清洁产品的体验。本研究的目的是开发肠道清洁影响评估量表(BOCLIR),以评估患者对肠道清洁产品的反应。

设计

内容源自定性访谈。通过认知反馈访谈评估表面效度和内容效度。最后,患者完成BOCLIR和一份人口统计学问卷。采用项目反应理论(拉施分析)进行项目删减和单维性评估。还评估了内部一致性和结构效度。

结果

对40次访谈的分析产生了三个量表:患者满意度、症状影响和活动受限。这些量表既可以单独使用,也可以一起使用。19次反馈访谈证明了BOCLIR的可接受性、相关性和易完成性。验证性调查涉及166名患者(男性占52%,平均(标准差)年龄54.3(15.2)岁)。去除不匹配和冗余项目后,所有量表均符合拉施模型,证实了它们的单维性。克朗巴赫α系数较高(0.77 - 0.94),表明内部一致性良好。BOCLIR得分与患者未来使用该产品的意愿以及饮用完整制剂的难易程度相关(每个量表p<0.01)。

结论

BOCLIR是一种新的测量工具,由三个单维量表(满意度、症状和活动受限)组成,具有良好的心理测量和量表特性。BOCLIR将能够准确评估患者对肠道清洁制剂的反应。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Bowel Cleansing Impact Review (BOCLIR).肠道清洁影响评估(BOCLIR)的开发与验证
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;4(2):112-119. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100278. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
2
Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前肠道准备患者的患者满意度量表验证
Patient. 2016 Feb;9(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0154-8.
3
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
4
Development and validation of a novel patient-reported treatment satisfaction measure for hyperfunctional facial lines: facial line satisfaction questionnaire.一种用于治疗面部功能亢进性皱纹的新型患者报告治疗满意度测量工具的开发与验证:面部皱纹满意度问卷
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Dec;14(4):274-85. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12166. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
5
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
6
Psychometric properties of self-report concussion scales and checklists.自我报告脑震荡量表和清单的心理计量特性。
J Athl Train. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):221-3. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.221.
7
Measure of activity performance of the hand (MAP-Hand) questionnaire: linguistic validation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing in people with rheumatoid arthritis in the UK.手部活动表现测量(MAP-Hand)问卷:在英国类风湿性关节炎患者中的语言验证、文化调适及心理测量测试
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2177-5.
8
The patient-reported impact of scars measure: development and validation.患者报告的疤痕影响测量:开发与验证。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;125(5):1439-1449. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d4fd89.
9
Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACROQOL) a new health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with acromegaly: development and psychometric properties.肢端肥大症生活质量问卷(ACROQOL):一种针对肢端肥大症患者的新型健康相关生活质量问卷——编制及心理测量特性
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002 Aug;57(2):251-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01597.x.
10
Content, face, and construct validity of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) as a measure of bowel-related quality of life in spinal cord injury.肠易激综合征生活质量量表(IBS-QOL)作为脊髓损伤相关肠功能生活质量的测量工具的内容、表面和结构效度。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Aug;42(6):1362-1373. doi: 10.1002/nau.25201. Epub 2023 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.结肠镜检查前极低容量准备的效果:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1950-1961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1950.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustained efficacy and high patient satisfaction after cheek enhancement with a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler.使用新型透明质酸真皮填充剂进行脸颊填充后具有持续疗效和较高的患者满意度。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Jan;11(1 Suppl):s9-16.
2
Patient and physician factors associated with adherence to diabetes medications.与糖尿病药物治疗依从性相关的患者和医生因素。
Diabetes Educ. 2012 May-Jun;38(3):397-408. doi: 10.1177/0145721712440333. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
3
Satisfaction with care in HIV-infected patients treated with long-term follow-up antiretroviral therapy: the role of social vulnerability.接受长期随访抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染患者对治疗的满意度:社会脆弱性的作用
AIDS Care. 2012;24(4):434-43. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.613909. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
4
Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science.衡量患者报告的结果:超越错位的常识,走向坚实的科学。
BMC Med. 2011 Jul 14;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-86.
5
The use of patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of medical products for regulatory approval.在评估医疗产品以获得监管批准时使用患者报告的结局指标。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;84(2):281-3. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.128. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
6
Key safety issues of bowel preparations for colonoscopy and importance of adequate hydration.结肠镜检查肠道准备的关键安全问题及充分补水的重要性。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):30-5; quiz 36-7. doi: 10.1097/01.SGA.0000310933.54551.ca.
7
Colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy--current issues.
Digestion. 2007;76(1):20-5. doi: 10.1159/000108390. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
8
Colonic gas explosion during therapeutic colonoscopy with electrocautery.治疗性结肠镜检查中使用电灼时发生结肠气体爆炸。
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 28;13(40):5295-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5295.
9
Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy.系统评价:结肠镜检查的口服肠道准备
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb 15;25(4):373-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03212.x.
10
Prospective audit of quality of colonoscopy in a surgical coloproctology unit.外科结直肠病科结肠镜检查质量的前瞻性审计
Surgeon. 2004 Apr;2(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(04)80054-4.