Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Bohoriceva 20, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Paediatrics-Diabetes Service Studies, University of Milan, Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Diabetologia. 2017 Nov;60(11):2157-2167. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4395-z. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Hypoglycaemia during and after exercise remains a challenge. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of closed-loop insulin delivery during unannounced (to the closed-loop algorithm) afternoon physical activity and during the following night in young people with type 1 diabetes.
A randomised, two-arm, open-label, in-hospital, crossover clinical trial was performed at a single site in Slovenia. The order was randomly determined using an automated web-based programme with randomly permuted blocks of four. Allocation assignment was not masked. Children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes who were experienced insulin pump users were eligible for the trial. During four separate in-hospital visits, the participants performed two unannounced exercise protocols: moderate intensity (55% of [Formula: see text]) and moderate intensity with integrated high-intensity sprints (55/80% of [Formula: see text]), using the same study device either for closed-loop or open-loop insulin delivery. We investigated glycaemic control during the exercise period and the following night. The closed-loop insulin delivery was applied from 15:00 h on the day of the exercise to 13:00 h on the following day.
Between 20 January and 16 June 2016, 20 eligible participants (9 female, mean age 14.2 ± 2.0 years, HbA 7.7 ± 0.6% [60.0 ± 6.6 mmol/mol]) were included in the trial and performed all trial-mandated activities. The median proportion of time spent in hypoglycaemia below 3.3 mmol/l was 0.00% for both treatment modalities (p = 0.7910). Use of the closed-loop insulin delivery system increased the proportion of time spent within the target glucose range of 3.9-10 mmol/l when compared with open-loop delivery: 84.1% (interquartile range 70.0-85.5) vs 68.7% (59.0-77.7), respectively (p = 0.0057), over the entire study period. This was achieved with significantly less insulin delivered via the closed-loop (p = 0.0123).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Closed-loop insulin delivery was safe both during and after unannounced exercise protocols in the in-hospital environment, maintaining glucose values mostly within the target range without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02657083 FUNDING: University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenian National Research Agency, and ISPAD Research Fellowship.
目的/假设:运动期间和之后的低血糖仍然是一个挑战。本研究评估了在未经通知的下午体力活动期间(对闭环算法)和随后的夜间,在 1 型糖尿病患者中使用闭环胰岛素输送的安全性和有效性。
在斯洛文尼亚的一个单一地点进行了一项随机、双臂、开放标签、住院、交叉临床试验。使用具有随机排列的 4 个块的自动基于网络的程序随机确定顺序。分配任务未被掩盖。有经验的胰岛素泵使用者的 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年有资格参加试验。在四次单独的住院访问期间,参与者进行了两项未经通知的运动方案:中等强度([Formula: see text]的 55%)和中等强度与集成高强度冲刺([Formula: see text]的 55/80%),使用相同的研究设备进行闭环或开环胰岛素输送。我们研究了运动期间和随后的夜间的血糖控制情况。闭环胰岛素输送从运动日的 15:00 开始,持续到次日 13:00。
在 2016 年 1 月 20 日至 6 月 16 日期间,共有 20 名符合条件的参与者(9 名女性,平均年龄 14.2±2.0 岁,HbA 7.7±0.6%[60.0±6.6mmol/mol])参加了试验,并完成了所有试验规定的活动。两种治疗方式的时间比例均处于 3.3mmol/l 以下的低血糖时间中位数为 0.00%(p=0.7910)。与开环输送相比,闭环胰岛素输送系统增加了血糖在 3.9-10mmol/l 目标范围内的时间比例:84.1%(四分位间距 70.0-85.5)与 68.7%(59.0-77.7),分别(p=0.0057),在整个研究期间。这是通过闭环输送显著减少胰岛素来实现的(p=0.0123)。
结论/解释:在住院环境中,闭环胰岛素输送在未经通知的运动方案期间和之后都是安全的,将葡萄糖值保持在目标范围内,而不会增加低血糖的风险。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02657083 资金来源:卢布尔雅那大学医学中心、斯洛文尼亚国家研究机构和 ISPAD 研究奖学金。