• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变的血运重建策略:确定罪犯血管与完全临时或分期治疗方案的抉择

Revascularization Strategies in STEMI with Multivessel Disease: Deciding on Culprit Versus Complete-Ad Hoc or Staged.

作者信息

Patel Shalin, Bailey Steven R

机构信息

From the Janey Briscoe Center of Excellence for Cardiovascular Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78232, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Aug 24;19(10):93. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0906-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-017-0906-2
PMID:28840487
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will address the clinical conundrum of those who may derive clinical benefit from complete revascularization of coronary stenosis that are discovered at the time of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The decision to revascularize additional vessels with angiographic stenosis beyond the culprit lesion remains controversial, as does the timing of revascularization.

RECENT FINDINGS

STEMI patients represent a high-risk patient population that have up to a 50% prevalence of multivessel disease. Multivessel disease represents an important risk factor for short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Potential benefits of multivessel PCI for STEMI might include reduced short- and long-term mortality, revascularization, reduced resource utilization, and costs. Which population will benefit and what the optimal timing of revascularization in the peri-MI period remains controversial. Consideration of multivessel revascularization in the setting of STEMI may occur in up to one half of STEMI patients. Evaluation of the comorbidities including diabetes, extent of myocardium at risk, lesion complexity, ventricular function, and risk factors for complications such as contrast induced nephropathy which is important in determining the appropriate care pathway.

摘要

综述目的

本综述将探讨那些在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)发作时发现冠状动脉狭窄,可能从完全血运重建中获得临床益处的患者所面临的临床难题。对于除罪犯病变外存在血管造影狭窄的其他血管进行血运重建的决策,以及血运重建的时机,仍存在争议。

最新发现

STEMI患者是高危患者群体,多支血管病变的患病率高达50%。多支血管病变是短期和长期发病及死亡的重要危险因素。STEMI患者进行多支血管PCI的潜在益处可能包括降低短期和长期死亡率、血运重建、减少资源利用和成本。哪些人群将从中受益以及在心肌梗死围手术期血运重建的最佳时机仍存在争议。在STEMI患者中,多达一半的患者可能会考虑进行多支血管血运重建。评估合并症,包括糖尿病、危险心肌范围、病变复杂性、心室功能以及造影剂肾病等并发症的危险因素,对于确定合适的治疗途径很重要。

相似文献

1
Revascularization Strategies in STEMI with Multivessel Disease: Deciding on Culprit Versus Complete-Ad Hoc or Staged.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变的血运重建策略:确定罪犯血管与完全临时或分期治疗方案的抉择
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Aug 24;19(10):93. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0906-2.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).血流储备分数指导下的完全血运重建改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并严重非罪犯病变患者的预后:DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI 子研究(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:仅治疗罪犯病变还是完全血运重建)
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460.
3
Timing of Staged Nonculprit Artery Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: COMPLETE Trial.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者分期非罪犯血管血运重建的时机:COMPLETE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 3;74(22):2713-2723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.051.
4
Comparison of Outcomes of Staged Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion-Only Revascularization for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者分期完全血运重建与仅罪犯病变血运重建的结局比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 15;119(4):508-514. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Updated Strategies in Non-Culprit Stenosis Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease-A Contemporary Review.多支血管病变非罪犯狭窄管理的更新策略:当代综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):263. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020263.
6
Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者仅针对罪犯血管与多支血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;121(5):529-536. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Stratified Analyses in High-Risk Patient Groups and Anatomic Subsets of Nonculprit Disease.罪犯血管与多血管与住院分期介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变患者:高危患者群体和非罪犯病变的解剖亚组的分层分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.024.
8
Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.COMPLETE 试验的设计和原理:比较完全经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与罪犯血管-only 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的随机、对照有效性研究。
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Multivessel Versus Culprit-only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction: Analysis of an 8-year Registry.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死中多支血管与仅罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项8年注册研究分析
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Jun;70(6):425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者住院期间分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行干预的长期结局
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):188-195. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000701.

本文引用的文献

1
Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Stratified Analyses in High-Risk Patient Groups and Anatomic Subsets of Nonculprit Disease.罪犯血管与多血管与住院分期介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变患者:高危患者群体和非罪犯病变的解剖亚组的分层分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.024.
2
Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with drug-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架治疗多支冠状动脉疾病患者的完全血运重建与不完全血运重建
Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
PCI Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉病变患者的 PCI 策略。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1066-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.086.
4
Complete vs Culprit-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in STEMI With Multivessel Disease: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.多支血管病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行完全 vs 罪犯血管血运重建:随机试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Dec;32(12):1542-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.02.077. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Culprit vessel versus immediate complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction-a systematic review.
Am Heart J. 2015 Dec;170(6):1133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
6
Comparison of Approaches to Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials.多支冠状动脉疾病合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者血运重建方法的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Dec 14;4(12):e002540. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002540.
7
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for Patients With Multi-Vessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支血管病变患者完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较:随机试验的最新荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):501-505. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26322. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.2015年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的重点更新:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南及2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南的更新
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1235-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.完全血运重建与罪犯病变治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变患者中的比较(DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI):一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):665-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1.
10
Complete revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变中的完全血运重建:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Heart. 2015 Aug;101(16):1309-17. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307293. Epub 2015 Jun 2.