Angle Orthod. 2017 Nov;87(6):834-840. doi: 10.2319/051817-338.1. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
To evaluate the effect of different curing modes available in a dental light-curing unit on degree of conversion (DC) of a composite photoactivated under a metal orthodontic bracket.
The average irradiance and total energy delivered by three curing modes (standard, high, and extra power) of a multiwave LED unit (Valo Cordless, Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah) were measured using the longest time available for each mode (20, 4, and 3 seconds, respectively). Brackets (n = 3/group) were bonded to molar epoxy resin replicas using each curing mode. Mesiodistal sections, 0.5 mm thick, were assessed using an infrared spectrometer microscope. Spectra of composite beneath the brackets were sequentially collected using the mapping tool in near-infrared (NIR)-transmittance mode. Composite conversion was mapped between the mesial and distal edges of the bracket base using 400-μm steps for a total of 10 measurements per specimen. Data from irradiance and total energy were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, while data of DC were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05).
The highest DC values were observed for standard power (mean 56%, P < .05), while no difference was observed between high (50%) and extra power (49%) modes. Regarding the site of measurement, higher DC was observed close to the bracket edges (52%, P < .05).
The use of high irradiance for a short time slightly reduced the DC. The small magnitude of reduction suggests that use of a high irradiance protocol is a clinically valid approach when bonding metal brackets.
评估牙科光固化机中可用的不同固化模式对金属正畸托槽下光激活复合树脂的转化率(DC)的影响。
使用最长的可用时间(分别为 20、4 和 3 秒)测量了多波长 LED 单元(Valo Cordless,Ultradent Products,南约旦,犹他州)的三种固化模式(标准、高和超强)的平均辐照度和总能量。使用每种固化模式将托槽(n = 3/组)粘结到磨牙环氧树脂复制品上。使用红外光谱显微镜评估 0.5 毫米厚的近中-远中截面。使用近红外(NIR)透射模式中的映射工具依次采集复合层下的光谱。使用 400-μm 的步长,在支架底座的近中-远中边缘之间对复合转化率进行映射,每个样本共进行 10 次测量。辐照度和总能量数据通过单向方差分析进行分析,而 DC 数据通过双向重复测量方差分析进行分析(α = 0.05)。
标准功率下观察到最高的 DC 值(平均值 56%,P <.05),而高功率(50%)和超强功率模式之间没有差异。关于测量位置,靠近托槽边缘的 DC 值更高(52%,P <.05)。
短时间高辐照度的使用略微降低了 DC。降低幅度较小表明,在粘结金属托槽时,使用高辐照度方案是一种临床有效的方法。