• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型三维磁共振成像模型在前置胎盘剖宫产切口中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of a novel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging model for uterine incision in placenta previa.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First People's Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):336-341. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12311. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12311
PMID:28842976
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess a novel three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model for determining position of uterine incision during cesarean delivery among patients with placenta previa.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted among women with singleton pregnancies complicated by placenta previa who delivered by cesarean at a hospital in China between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2016. Patients chose whether to undergo 3D MRI modeling to guide uterine incision (study group) or the standard intervention (control group). Medical records were reviewed to collect data on maternal, neonatal, and operative characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 134 women enrolled, 45 were in the study group and 89 in the control group. When compared with the control group, patients in the study group experienced less intraoperative blood loss (678.65 ± 649.54 vs 933.96 ± 695.25 mL; P=0.042) and shorter operative times (65.13 ± 27.38 vs 86.88 ± 54.43 minutes; P=0.013). Fewer patients in the study group received transfusions (11 [24%] vs 38 [43%]; P=0.038). No between-group differences were found for hysterectomy rate, hospitalization days and cost, or neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Uterine incision guided by a 3D MRI model could improve maternal outcomes during cesarean delivery, including reductions in intraoperative blood loss, transfusion frequency, and operative time.

摘要

目的

评估一种新的三维(3D)磁共振成像(MRI)模型,用于确定前置胎盘患者剖宫产时子宫切口的位置。

方法

一项前瞻性研究在中国的一家医院进行,研究对象为 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 1 月 1 日期间单胎妊娠合并前置胎盘的剖宫产产妇。患者选择是否进行 3D MRI 建模以指导子宫切口(研究组)或标准干预(对照组)。回顾病历以收集产妇、新生儿和手术特征的数据。

结果

在纳入的 134 名女性中,45 名在研究组,89 名在对照组。与对照组相比,研究组术中出血量较少(678.65±649.54 比 933.96±695.25 毫升;P=0.042),手术时间更短(65.13±27.38 比 86.88±54.43 分钟;P=0.013)。研究组接受输血的患者较少(11 [24%] 比 38 [43%];P=0.038)。两组间子宫切除术率、住院天数和费用或新生儿结局无差异。

结论

3D MRI 模型指导的子宫切口可改善剖宫产术中的产妇结局,包括减少术中出血量、输血频率和手术时间。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of a novel three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging model for uterine incision in placenta previa.新型三维磁共振成像模型在前置胎盘剖宫产切口中的安全性和有效性。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):336-341. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12311. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
2
Efficacy of intraoperative wireless ultrasonography for uterine incision among patients with adherence findings in placenta previa.术中无线超声检查在胎盘前置粘连患者子宫切口中的疗效。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Jun;46(6):876-882. doi: 10.1111/jog.14243. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Random placenta margin incision for control hemorrhage during cesarean delivery complicated by complete placenta previa: a prospective cohort study.剖宫产术中完全性前置胎盘并发出血时随机胎盘边缘切口控制出血的前瞻性队列研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Sep;32(18):3054-3061. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1457638. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Effects of prophylactic uterine artery embolization on second-trimester induced abortions in patients with placenta previa.预防性子宫动脉栓塞术对前置胎盘患者中期引产的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Nov;143(2):205-210. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12638. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa : Skin incision for placenta previa.横切口与纵切口行前置胎盘剖宫产术的母婴结局:前置胎盘的剖宫产术式。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03923-1.
6
Transecting versus avoiding incision of the anterior placenta previa during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中横断与避开前置胎盘切口
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jan;128(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
7
Conservative management of placenta previa complicated by abnormal placentation.前置胎盘合并胎盘植入异常的保守治疗
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Jul;26(10):1012-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.766708. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
8
Minimizing blood loss at cesarean-hysterectomy for placenta previa percreta.前置胎盘植入剖宫产子宫切除术中减少失血
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):78.e1-78.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
9
Retrospective cohort study of prophylactic intraoperative uterine artery embolization for abnormally invasive placenta.预防性术中子宫动脉栓塞治疗胎盘植入异常的回顾性队列研究
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Apr;137(1):45-50. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12090. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
10
Direct puncture embolization of the internal iliac artery during cesarean delivery for pernicious placenta previa coexisting with placenta accreta.剖宫产术中对合并植入性胎盘的凶险性前置胎盘患者行髂内动脉直接穿刺栓塞术。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Dec;135(3):264-267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in human placenta: insights into fetal growth restriction and congenital heart disease.人类胎盘的高级磁共振成像:对胎儿生长受限和先天性心脏病的见解。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 23;11:1426593. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1426593. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk assessment of severe postpartum hemorrhage after invasive placenta accreta based on three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging.基于磁共振成像三维重建的侵袭性胎盘植入产后严重出血风险评估
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Jan 15;11(1):8. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2940. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
3
Clinical analysis of uterine artery embolization combined with double balloon catheter plus curettage for patients with placenta previa who underwent pregnancy termination and suffered antenatal massive hemorrhage in the 2nd trimester: Three case reports.
子宫动脉栓塞联合双球囊导管加刮宫术治疗中期妊娠前置胎盘终止妊娠并产前大出血患者的临床分析:三例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(4):e14266. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014266.