Zavlin Dmitry, Jubbal Kevin T, Ellsworth Warren A, Spiegel Aldona J
Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California.
Microsurgery. 2018 May;38(4):413-418. doi: 10.1002/micr.30218. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
Suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) has been considered a relative contraindication for autologous breast reconstruction due to reservations about size and integrity of perforator vessels. Such patients are often not considered ideal candidates for breast reconstruction utilizing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The aim of this article is to describe our experience with these flaps after SAL.
Retrospectively, patient charts from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed and 9 patients (13 flaps) were identified who received breast reconstruction after prior donor-site SAL. Eight patients underwent DIEP and 1 patient an SIEA flap breast reconstruction. The patients' average age was 47.7 (ranging 33-64) years and their BMI 26.0 (ranging 21.1-36.5). Preoperative radiologic studies were obtained for all patients via either Doppler ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging to assess abdominal perforators. Abdominal SAL took place between 2 and 20 years before reconstruction.
On average, 2.4 (ranging 1-4) perforators with a mean diameter of 0.68 mm (ranging 0.2-2.5 mm) were included per DIEP flap and anastomosed to the internal mammary arteries. Median follow-up period was 1.2 (ranging 0.5-9.6) years without any flap loss, flap necrosis, hematoma, or unplanned reoperation. One breast seroma and one fat necrosis occurred. All patients had a successful reconstruction and finished treatment at our institution.
Our results show that DIEP and SIEA flaps are safe and effective options for breast reconstruction in patients with previous abdominal SAL. Extensive preoperative patient evaluation and perforator imaging is important in identifying suitable candidates within this patient population.
由于对穿支血管的大小和完整性存在疑虑,吸脂辅助脂肪切除术(SAL)一直被视为自体乳房重建的相对禁忌证。这类患者通常不被认为是利用腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉(SIEA)皮瓣进行乳房重建的理想候选人。本文旨在描述我们在SAL术后应用这些皮瓣的经验。
回顾性分析2005年至2015年的患者病历,确定9例(13个皮瓣)在供区先行SAL后接受乳房重建的患者。8例行DIEP皮瓣乳房重建,1例行SIEA皮瓣乳房重建。患者平均年龄47.7岁(33 - 64岁),BMI为26.0(21.1 - 36.5)。所有患者均通过多普勒超声或断层成像进行术前影像学检查,以评估腹壁穿支。腹壁SAL在重建前2至20年进行。
每个DIEP皮瓣平均包含2.4支(1 - 4支)穿支,平均直径0.68 mm(0.2 - 2.5 mm),并与胸廓内动脉吻合。中位随访期为1.2年(0.5 - 9.6年),未发生任何皮瓣丢失、皮瓣坏死、血肿或计划外再次手术。发生1例乳房血清肿和1例脂肪坏死。所有患者均成功重建并在我院完成治疗。
我们的结果表明,对于既往有腹壁SAL的患者,DIEP和SIEA皮瓣是安全有效的乳房重建选择。广泛的术前患者评估和穿支成像对于在该患者群体中识别合适的候选人很重要。