• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卡非佐米或硼替佐米治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(ENDEAVOR):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验的中期总生存分析。

Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Heidelberg Medical University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1327-1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8
PMID:28843768
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial was a head-to-head comparison of two proteasome inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Progression-free survival was previously reported to be significantly longer with carfilzomib administered in combination with dexamethasone than with bortezomib and dexamethasone in an interim analysis. The aim of this second interim analysis was to compare overall survival between the two treatment groups.

METHODS

ENDEAVOR was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were recruited from 198 hospitals and outpatient clinics in 27 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and had received between one and three previous lines of therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive carfilzomib and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (bortezomib group) through a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four), stratified by International Staging System stage, previous lines of treatment, previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, and planned route of bortezomib delivery if assigned to the bortezomib group. Carfilzomib (20 mg/m on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m thereafter) was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles; bortezomib (1·3 mg/m) was given as an intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) was given on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 in the carfilzomib group and on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in the bortezomib group. The primary endpoint of ENDEAVOR, progression-free survival, has been previously reported. A stratified log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups for this prospectively planned second interim analysis. Efficacy assessments were done in all randomly assigned patients (the intention-to-treat population) and the safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866, and is no longer enrolling patients.

FINDINGS

Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 1096 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 929 were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group and 465 to the bortezomib group). The cutoff date for this prespecified interim analysis was Jan 3, 2017. Median overall survival was 47·6 months (95% CI 42·5-not evaluable) in the carfilzomib group versus 40·0 months (32·6-42·3) in the bortezomib group (hazard ratio 0·791 [95% CI 0·648-0·964], one-sided p=0·010). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 377 (81%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and 324 (71%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group, and serious adverse events in 273 (59%) patients in the carfilzomib group and 182 (40%) in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were anaemia (76 [16%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 46 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (67 [15%] vs 15 [3%]), pneumonia (42 [9%] vs 39 [9%]), thrombocytopenia (41 [9%] vs 43 [9%]), fatigue (31 [7%] vs 35 [8%]), dyspnoea (29 [6%] vs ten [2%]), decreased lymphocyte count (29 [6%] vs nine [2%]), diarrhoea (18 [4%] vs 39 [9%]), and peripheral neuropathy (six [1%] vs 28 [6%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (1%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group (pneumonia [n=2], interstitial lung disease [n=1], septic shock [n=1], and unknown [n=1]) and two (<1%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group (cardiac arrest [n=1] and pneumonia [n=1]).

INTERPRETATION

Carfilzomib provided a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of death compared with bortezomib. To our knowledge, carfilzomib is the first and only multiple myeloma treatment that extends overall survival in the relapsed setting over the current standard of care. This study is informative for deciding which proteasome inhibitor to use for treating this disease.

FUNDING

Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc, an Amgen Inc subsidiary.

摘要

背景

ENDEAVOR 是一项头对头比较两种蛋白酶体抑制剂在复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效的 3 期临床试验。中期分析结果显示,与硼替佐米和地塞米松联合治疗组相比,卡非佐米联合地塞米松治疗组的无进展生存期显著延长。本次第二次中期分析旨在比较两组患者的总生存期。

方法

ENDEAVOR 是一项在欧洲、北美、南美和亚太地区 27 个国家的 198 家医院和门诊进行的 3 期、开放标签、随机对照试验。纳入的患者年龄≥18 岁,诊断为复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤,且接受过 1 至 3 线治疗。患者按照 1:1 比例随机(1 个 4 人组块)接受卡非佐米联合地塞米松(卡非佐米组)或硼替佐米联合地塞米松(硼替佐米组)治疗,分组依据国际分期系统(ISS)分期、先前治疗线数、先前蛋白酶体抑制剂治疗和如果分配至硼替佐米组则计划的硼替佐米给药途径。卡非佐米(第 1 周期 1 天和 2 天 20mg/m2;此后 56mg/m2)于 28 天周期第 1、2、8、9、15 和 16 天静脉输注 30 分钟;硼替佐米(1.3mg/m2)于 21 天周期第 1、4、8 和 11 天静脉推注或皮下注射。卡非佐米组第 1、2、8、9、15、16、22 和 23 天及硼替佐米组第 1、2、4、5、8、9、11 和 12 天给予地塞米松(20mg 口服或静脉滴注)。主要终点无进展生存期已在先前报道。本次前瞻性计划的第二次中期分析采用分层对数秩检验比较两组的总生存期。疗效评估在所有随机分组患者(意向治疗人群)中进行,安全性分析包括至少接受一剂研究治疗的患者。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01568866,不再招募患者。

结果

2012 年 6 月 20 日至 2014 年 6 月 30 日,对 1096 名患者进行了入组评估,其中 929 名患者被随机分组(卡非佐米组 464 名,硼替佐米组 465 名)。本次预设的中期分析截止日期为 2017 年 1 月 3 日。卡非佐米组的中位总生存期为 47.6 个月(95%CI 42.5-无法评估),硼替佐米组为 40.0 个月(32.6-42.3)(风险比 0.791[95%CI 0.648-0.964],单侧 p=0.010)。卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 377 例(81%)和硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 324 例(71%)报告了 3 级或更高级别的不良事件,卡非佐米组 273 例(59%)患者和硼替佐米组 182 例(40%)患者报告了严重不良事件。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的不良事件为贫血(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 76 例[16%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 46 例[10%])、高血压(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 67 例[15%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 15 例[3%])、肺炎(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 42 例[9%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 39 例[9%])、血小板减少症(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 41 例[9%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 43 例[9%])、疲劳(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 31 例[7%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 35 例[8%])、呼吸困难(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 29 例[6%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 10 例[2%])、淋巴细胞计数减少(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 29 例[6%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 9 例[2%])、腹泻(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 18 例[4%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 39 例[9%])和周围神经病(卡非佐米组 463 例患者中 6 例[1%],硼替佐米组 456 例患者中 28 例[6%])。卡非佐米组 5 例(1%)患者和硼替佐米组 2 例(<1%)患者发生与治疗相关的死亡(卡非佐米组:肺炎[2 例]、间质性肺病[1 例]、感染性休克[1 例]和未知[1 例];硼替佐米组:心脏骤停[1 例]和肺炎[1 例])。

结论

卡非佐米与硼替佐米相比,显著降低了死亡风险,具有显著的临床意义。据我们所知,卡非佐米是复发患者中首个且唯一能延长总体生存时间的多发性骨髓瘤治疗药物。本研究为决定使用哪种蛋白酶体抑制剂治疗该疾病提供了信息。

资金来源

Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc,隶属于 Amgen Inc。

相似文献

1
Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.卡非佐米或硼替佐米治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(ENDEAVOR):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验的中期总生存分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1327-1337. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
2
Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study.卡非佐米和地塞米松与硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的比较(ENDEAVOR):一项随机、3 期、开放标签、多中心研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
3
Once weekly versus twice weekly carfilzomib dosing in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (A.R.R.O.W.): interim analysis results of a randomised, phase 3 study.每周一次与每周两次卡非佐米给药治疗复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(A.R.R.O.W.):一项随机、3 期研究的中期分析结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):953-964. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30354-1. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
4
Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 3 trial.帕比司他联合硼替佐米和地塞米松对比硼替佐米和地塞米松联合安慰剂治疗复发或复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者:一项多中心、随机、双盲的 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1195-206. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70440-1. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
5
Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): updated outcomes from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.卡非佐米、地塞米松和达雷妥尤单抗与卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(CANDOR):一项随机、多中心、开放标签、3 期研究的更新结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00579-9. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
6
Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.来那度胺治疗后复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的泊马度胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗(OPTIMISMM):一项随机、开放标签、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jun;20(6):781-794. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30152-4. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
Venetoclax or placebo in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BELLINI): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial.维奈托克或安慰剂联合硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(BELLINI):一项随机、双盲、多中心、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Dec;21(12):1630-1642. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30525-8. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Isatuximab plus carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus carfilzomib-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): overall survival analysis of a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.isatuximab联合卡非佐米-地塞米松对比卡非佐米-地塞米松治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤患者(IKEMA):一项3期随机对照试验的总生存分析
Lancet Haematol. 2024 Oct;11(10):e741-e750. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(24)00148-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
9
Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.卡非佐米、地塞米松和达雷妥尤单抗与卡非佐米和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者(CANDOR):一项随机、多中心、开放性、3 期研究的结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jul 18;396(10245):186-197. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30734-0.
10
Bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and panobinostat for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MUK-six): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.硼替佐米、沙利度胺、地塞米松和帕比司他用于复发多发性骨髓瘤患者(MUK-six):一项多中心、开放标签的1/2期试验
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Dec;3(12):e572-e580. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30165-X. Epub 2016 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus Guidelines and Recommendations for the anti-CD38-based Therapy in Clinical Practice for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: From the Pan-Pacific Multiple Myeloma Working Group.《复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤临床实践中基于抗CD38治疗的共识指南与建议:来自泛太平洋多发性骨髓瘤工作组》
Clin Hematol Int. 2025 Aug 8;7(3):36-59. doi: 10.46989/001c.141401. eCollection 2025.
2
The Emerging Role of Left Atrial Strain in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Carfilzomib Therapy.左心房应变在接受卡非佐米治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者心血管风险分层中的新兴作用。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;17(14):2375. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142375.
3
Approaches To Managing Relapsed Myeloma: Switching Drug Class or Retreatment With Same Drug Class?
复发骨髓瘤的治疗方法:更换药物类别还是用同一药物类别再次治疗?
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2025 Jul;41(3):478-493. doi: 10.1007/s12288-025-02008-9. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
4
Cardiac biomarkers for risk stratification in newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma in the GMMG-CONCEPT trial.GMMG-CONCEPT试验中用于新诊断高危多发性骨髓瘤风险分层的心脏生物标志物
Cardiooncology. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00358-x.
5
Navigating the Complexities of Cancer Treatment-Induced Hypertension.应对癌症治疗引发的高血压的复杂性
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 19;12(6):235. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060235.
6
Multiple Myeloma Unpacked.解读多发性骨髓瘤
Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jun;43 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e70067. doi: 10.1002/hon.70067.
7
Potential surrogate endpoint for B-cell hematologic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.B细胞血液系统恶性肿瘤的潜在替代终点:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 2;15(1):19300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05053-6.
8
Post-Translational Modifications in Multiple Myeloma: Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Therapeutic Opportunities.多发性骨髓瘤中的翻译后修饰:耐药机制与治疗机遇
Biomolecules. 2025 May 12;15(5):702. doi: 10.3390/biom15050702.
9
Analysis of pharmacotherapeutic approaches for multiple myeloma and correlated renal and pulmonary impairments: a retrospective real-world registry study in the Greater Gulf Region (REPAIR Study).多发性骨髓瘤及相关肾肺损伤的药物治疗方法分析:大湾地区的一项回顾性真实世界注册研究(REPAIR研究)
Front Oncol. 2025 May 9;15:1547138. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1547138. eCollection 2025.
10
Carfilzomib prescribing patterns and outcomes for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a real-world analysis.复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤的卡非佐米处方模式及疗效:一项真实世界分析
Blood Cancer J. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01256-2.