Nikolova Teodora, Marini Federico, Kaina Bernd
Institute of Toxicology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2017 Oct;822:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
Genotoxicity testing relies on the quantitative measurement of adverse effects, such as chromosome aberrations, micronuclei, and mutations, resulting from primary DNA damage. Ideally, assays will detect DNA damage and cellular responses with high sensitivity, reliability, and throughput. Several novel genotoxicity assays may fulfill these requirements, including the comet assay and the more recently developed γH2AX assay. Although they are thought to be specific for genotoxicants, a systematic comparison of the assays has not yet been undertaken. In the present study, we compare the γH2AX focus assay with the alkaline and neutral versions of the comet assay, as to their sensitivities and limitations for detection of genetic damage. We investigated the dose-response relationships of γH2AX foci and comet tail intensities at various times following treatment with four prototypical genotoxicants, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG), mitomycin C, and hydrogen peroxide (HO) and we tested whether there is a correlation between the endpoints, i.e., alkali-labile sites and DNA strand breaks on the one hand and the cell's response to DNA double-strand breaks and blocked replication forks on the other. Induction of γH2AX foci gave a linear dose response and all agents tested were positive in the assay. The increase in comet tail intensity was also a function of dose; however, mitomycin C was almost completely ineffective in the comet assay, and the doses needed to achieve a significant effect were somewhat higher for some treatments in the comet assay than in the γH2AX foci assay, which was confirmed by threshold analysis. There was high correlation between tail intensity and γH2AX foci for MMS and HO, less for MNNG, and none for mitomycin C. From this we infer that the γH2AX foci assay is more reliable, sensitive, and robust than the comet assay for detecting genotoxicant-induced DNA damage.
遗传毒性测试依赖于对由原发性DNA损伤导致的不良反应进行定量测量,如染色体畸变、微核和突变。理想情况下,检测方法应能以高灵敏度、可靠性和通量检测DNA损伤和细胞反应。几种新型遗传毒性检测方法可能满足这些要求,包括彗星试验和最近开发的γH2AX检测法。尽管它们被认为对遗传毒性物质具有特异性,但尚未对这些检测方法进行系统比较。在本研究中,我们比较了γH2AX焦点检测法与彗星试验的碱性和中性版本在检测遗传损伤方面的灵敏度和局限性。我们研究了用四种典型遗传毒性物质甲磺酸甲酯(MMS)、N-甲基-N'-硝基-N-亚硝基胍(MNNG)、丝裂霉素C和过氧化氢(HO)处理后不同时间γH2AX焦点和彗星尾强度的剂量反应关系,并测试了两个终点之间是否存在相关性,即一方面是碱不稳定位点和DNA链断裂,另一方面是细胞对DNA双链断裂和受阻复制叉的反应。γH2AX焦点的诱导呈现线性剂量反应,所有测试试剂在该检测中均呈阳性。彗星尾强度的增加也是剂量的函数;然而,丝裂霉素C在彗星试验中几乎完全无效,并且在彗星试验中,某些处理达到显著效果所需的剂量比γH2AX焦点检测法中的剂量略高,这通过阈值分析得到证实。MMS和HO的尾强度与γH2AX焦点之间相关性高,MNNG的相关性较低,丝裂霉素C则无相关性。由此我们推断,在检测遗传毒性物质诱导的DNA损伤方面,γH2AX焦点检测法比彗星试验更可靠、灵敏且稳健。