Villines Todd C, Hsu Lucy L, Blackshear Chad, Nelson Cheryl R, Griswold Michael
Cardiology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1528-1532. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
Although several prospective studies have reported independent relations between carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and risk of incident cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in primarily non-African-American (AA) cohorts, the utility of CIMT values for the prediction of incident coronary heart disease and stroke events in blacks remain unclear. At the baseline examination (2000 to 2004) of the Jackson Heart Study, AA adults 21 to 94 years of age (mean 54) underwent bilateral far-wall CIMT measurement (mean 0.76 mm). Incident CVD events were then assessed over 7 to 11 years of follow-up (2000 to 2011) from samples of 2,463 women (107 CVD events) and 1,338 men (64 CVD events) who were free of clinical CVD at baseline. Each 0.2-mm increase in CIMT was associated with age-adjusted incident CVD hazard ratios of 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2, 1.5) for women and 1.3 (1.1, 1.6) for men. Classification accuracy improved only slightly when comparing multivariable models that used traditional risk factors alone with models that added CIMT: C-statistics 0.837 (0.794, 0.881) versus 0.842 (0.798, 0.886) in women and 0.754 (0.683, 0.826) versus 0.763 (0.701, 0.825) in men. Similarly, risk reclassification was only mildly improved by adding CIMT: Net Reclassification Index 0.13 (p = 0.05) and 0.05 (p = 0.50) for women and men, respectively; Integrated Discrimination Improvement 0.02 (p = 0.02) and 0.01 (p = 0.26) for women and men, respectively. In conclusion, CIMT was associated with incident CVD but provided modest incremental improvement in risk reclassification beyond traditional risk factors in a community-based AA cohort.
尽管多项前瞻性研究报告了在主要为非非裔美国人(AA)的队列中,颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)与心血管疾病(CVD)发病风险之间存在独立关系,但CIMT值对于预测黑人冠心病和中风事件的效用仍不明确。在杰克逊心脏研究的基线检查(2000年至2004年)中,21至94岁(平均54岁)的非裔美国成年人接受了双侧远壁CIMT测量(平均0.76毫米)。随后在7至11年的随访期(2000年至2011年)内,对2463名女性(107例CVD事件)和1338名男性(64例CVD事件)样本中的新发CVD事件进行了评估,这些人在基线时无临床CVD。CIMT每增加0.2毫米,女性年龄调整后的CVD发病风险比为1.4(95%置信区间1.2, 1.5),男性为1.3(1.1, 1.6)。将仅使用传统危险因素的多变量模型与加入CIMT的模型进行比较时,分类准确率仅略有提高:女性的C统计量分别为0.837(0.794, 0.881)和0.842(0.798, 0.886),男性分别为0.754(0.683, 0.826)和0.763(0.701, 0.825)。同样,加入CIMT后风险重新分类仅略有改善:女性和男性的净重新分类指数分别为0.13(p = 0.05)和0.05(p = 0.50);女性和男性的综合辨别改善分别为0.02(p = 0.02)和0.01(p = 0.26)。总之,CIMT与新发CVD相关,但在基于社区的非裔美国队列中,其在风险重新分类方面相对于传统危险因素仅提供了适度的增量改善。