• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期与晚期泪小管撕裂修复的结果

Early Versus Late Canalicular Laceration Repair Outcomes.

作者信息

Chu Yen-Chang, Wu Shu-Ya, Tsai Yueh-Ju, Liao Yi-Lin, Chu Hsueh-Yen

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan; Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan; Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.006
PMID:28844640
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether delayed repair of traumatic canalicular laceration affects the final outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

The medical records of 334 patients who underwent primary traumatic canalicular laceration repair were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical timing within 48 hours (early) or after 48 hours (delayed). The anatomic results were compared between these 2 groups. The causes of delayed repair and the mean operation time were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 23 failed cases among 301 patients (7.6%) who had a repair within 48 hours and 3 failed cases among 33 patients (9.1%) who had a repair after 48 hours (P = .732). The mean operation time was 62 minutes in the early group and 66.3 minutes in the delayed group, which showed no significant difference (P = .371). The major cause of delayed surgery was traumatic brain injury, followed by facial or orbital fracture, long bone fracture, and chest injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed canalicular repair in unstable patients did not lead to poor results. An elective scheduling surgery, instead of an urgent repair, is feasible for an experienced surgeon.

摘要

目的

确定外伤性泪小管撕裂伤延迟修复是否会影响最终结果。

设计

回顾性病例系列研究。

方法

回顾性分析334例行原发性外伤性泪小管撕裂伤修复患者的病历。根据手术时机将患者分为两组,48小时内(早期)或48小时后(延迟)。比较两组的解剖学结果。分析延迟修复的原因及平均手术时间。

结果

48小时内修复的301例患者中有23例失败(7.6%),48小时后修复的33例患者中有3例失败(9.1%)(P = 0.732)。早期组平均手术时间为62分钟,延迟组为66.3分钟,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.371)。延迟手术的主要原因是创伤性脑损伤,其次是面部或眼眶骨折、长骨骨折和胸部损伤。

结论

不稳定患者延迟泪小管修复不会导致不良结果。对于经验丰富的外科医生来说,择期安排手术而非紧急修复是可行的。

相似文献

1
Early Versus Late Canalicular Laceration Repair Outcomes.早期与晚期泪小管撕裂修复的结果
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;182:155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Is the distance from punctum a factor in the anatomical and functional success of canalicular laceration repairs?泪点距离是否是泪小管撕裂修复术解剖和功能成功的一个因素?
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov;65(11):1114-1119. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_499_17.
3
Canalicular lacerations: Factors predicting outcome at a tertiary eye care centre.泪小管裂伤:三级眼科护理中心预后的预测因素。
Orbit. 2017 Feb;36(1):13-18. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1279646. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Lacrimal canalicular transplantation with composite eyelid graft.带复合眼睑移植物的泪小管移植。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):23-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b8ee93.
5
Canalicular laceration visualisation using chandelier illumination.使用吊灯照明可视化泪小管撕裂伤。
BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Feb 11;12(2):e227798. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227798.
6
Clinical characteristics and treatment of blow-out fracture accompanied by canalicular laceration.伴有泪小管断裂的眼眶爆裂性骨折的临床特征及治疗
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Sep;23(5):1399-403. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825ab043.
7
Comparing pericanalicular sutures with direct canalicular wall sutures for canalicular laceration.比较经小管缝合与直接小管壁缝合治疗泪小管断裂。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(6):422-5. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31822113df.
8
Canalicular laceration repair: an analysis of variables affecting success.泪小管裂伤修复:影响成功率的变量分析
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;30(5):410-4. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000133.
9
Canalicular laceration repair using a viscoelastic injection to locate and dilate the proximal torn edge.使用粘弹性注射定位并扩张近端撕裂边缘来修复泪小管撕裂伤。
J AAPOS. 2015 Jun;19(3):217-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.02.013.
10
Effectiveness of canalicular laceration repair using monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes.使用 Monoka 管行单导管插管修复泪小管断裂的效果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(7):793-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01644.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Traumatic Canalicular Lacerations: Characteristics and Prognostic Factors.小儿外伤性泪小管断裂:特征与预后因素
J Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 24;2025:8582651. doi: 10.1155/joph/8582651. eCollection 2025.
2
Canalicular lacerations: Techniques used and timing to intervene.泪小管撕裂伤:所采用的技术及干预时机。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 27;16(2):201-204. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_101_23. eCollection 2023 May-Aug.
3
A case series study of lacrimal canalicular laceration repair with the bi-canalicular stent.双泪小管支架修复泪小管撕裂的病例系列研究
Gland Surg. 2022 Nov;11(11):1801-1807. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-556.
4
Risk factors for persistent epiphora following successful canalicular laceration repair.泪小管断裂修复成功后持续性溢泪的危险因素。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 18;14(1):106-111. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.01.15. eCollection 2021.
5
Eiology and prognosis of canalicular laceration repair using canalicular anastomosis combined with bicanalicular stent intubation.使用联合双泪小管支架插管的泪小管吻合术修复泪小管裂伤的病因学和预后。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun 22;20(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01506-w.
6
Bicanalicular Intubation to Repair Canalicular Laceration Guided by 6-0 Prolene with Pigtail Probe.用带尾纤探针的6-0普理灵缝线引导下双泪小管插管修复泪小管撕裂伤
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;33(6):569-570. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0070.
7
Clinical Characteristics, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Outcomes of Canalicular Laceration Repair with Monocanalicular Stent in Asia.亚洲地区使用单泪小管支架修复泪小管裂伤的临床特征、术中发现及手术结果
J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 2;2019:5872485. doi: 10.1155/2019/5872485. eCollection 2019.
8
[Diagnostics and treatment of lacrimal duct diseases : A structured patient-centred care concept].[泪道疾病的诊断与治疗:以患者为中心的结构化护理理念]
HNO. 2018 Oct;66(10):751-759. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0535-0.