• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私人医疗保险交易所:早期证据及对未来的启示

Private Health Insurance Exchanges: Early Evidence and Implications for the Future.

作者信息

Buttorff Christine, Nowak Sarah, Syme James, Eibner Christine

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 13;6(2):2. eCollection 2017 Jan.

PMID:28845340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5568156/
Abstract

Private health insurance exchanges offer employer health insurance, combining online shopping, increased plan choice, benefit administration, and cost-containment strategies. This article examines how private exchanges function, how they may affect employers and employees, and the possible implications for the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) Marketplaces. The authors found that private exchanges could encourage employees to select less-generous plans. This could expose employees to higher out-of-pocket costs, but premium contributions would drop substantially, so net spending would decrease. On the other hand, employee spending may increase if, in moving to private exchanges, employers decrease their health insurance contributions. Most employers can avoid the ACA's "Cadillac tax" by reducing the generosity of the plans they offer, regardless of whether they move to a private exchange. There is not yet enough evidence to determine whether the private exchanges will become prominent in the insurance market and how they will affect employers and their employees.

摘要

私营医疗保险交易所提供雇主医疗保险,融合了在线购物、更多的保险计划选择、福利管理以及成本控制策略。本文探讨了私营交易所的运作方式、它们可能如何影响雇主和员工,以及对《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的小企业健康选择计划(SHOP)市场的潜在影响。作者发现,私营交易所可能会鼓励员工选择福利较低的保险计划。这可能会使员工面临更高的自付费用,但保费缴纳会大幅下降,因此净支出会减少。另一方面,如果雇主在转向私营交易所时减少其医疗保险缴费,员工支出可能会增加。大多数雇主可以通过降低所提供保险计划的福利水平来避免ACA的“凯迪拉克税”,无论他们是否转向私营交易所。目前尚无足够证据来确定私营交易所在保险市场是否会占据显著地位,以及它们将如何影响雇主及其员工。

相似文献

1
Private Health Insurance Exchanges: Early Evidence and Implications for the Future.私人医疗保险交易所:早期证据及对未来的启示
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 13;6(2):2. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation.在公共和私人医疗保险市场购物:消费者决策辅助工具和计划介绍。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1400-1410. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4483-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Small employer perspectives on the Affordable Care Act's premiums, SHOP exchanges, and self-insurance.小企业主对平价医疗法案保费、SHOP 交易所和自我保险的看法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Nov;32(11):2032-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0861. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
4
An Early Look At SHOP Marketplaces: Low Premiums, Adequate Plan Choice In Many, But Not All, States.早期观察SHOP市场:保费较低,在许多(但并非所有)州有足够的保险计划选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 May;34(5):732-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1370.
5
Small increases to employer premiums could shift millions of people to the exchanges and add billions to federal outlays.雇主保费的小幅增加可能会使数百万人转向交易所,并使联邦支出增加数十亿美元。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1531-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0522.
6
Promoting Value for Consumers: Comparing Individual Health Insurance Markets Inside and Outside the ACA's Exchanges.为消费者提升价值:比较《平价医疗法案》交易所内外的个人健康保险市场。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jun;12:1-10.
7
Changes in Consumer Cost-Sharing for Health Plans Sold in the ACA's Insurance Marketplaces, 2015 to 2016.2015年至2016年在《平价医疗法案》保险市场上销售的健康保险计划中消费者成本分摊的变化
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 May;11:1-14.
8
Comparing Individual Health Coverage On and Off the Affordable Care Act's Insurance Exchanges.比较《平价医疗法案》保险交易所内外的个人医保覆盖情况。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Aug;26:1-8.
9
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: State Action to Establish SHOP Marketplaces.实施《平价医疗法案》:各州建立小企业健康选择计划(SHOP)市场的行动。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2014 Mar;3:1-14.
10
Minimum Value of Eligible Employer-Sponsored Plans and Other Rules Regarding the Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit. Final regulations.合格雇主赞助计划的最低价值及与医疗保险费税收抵免相关的其他规则。最终法规。
Fed Regist. 2015 Dec 18;80(243):78971-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of family risk pooling for individual health insurance markets.家庭风险共担对个人健康保险市场的影响。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2017 Dec;17(3-4):219-236. doi: 10.1007/s10742-017-0170-3. Epub 2017 May 26.