A randomised comparison of incidence of radial artery occlusion and symptomatic radial artery spasm associated with elective transradial coronary intervention using 6.5 Fr SheathLess Eaucath Guiding Catheter vs. 6.0 Fr Glidesheath Slender.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare incidences of radial artery occlusion (RAO) and spasm (RAS) associated with transradial coronary intervention (TRI) using a 6.5 Fr SheathLess hydrophilic-coated guide catheter (SH-GC) vs. a 6.0 Fr Glidesheath Slender (GSS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted an open-label, single-centre, randomised study to compare radial complications in 600 consecutive patients undergoing elective TRI using 6.5 Fr SH-GC (n=300) or 6.0 Fr GSS (n=300) between 2015 and 2016. The primary endpoint was a composite of RAO evaluated by sonography and symptomatic RAS. The mean diameter of radial arteries was 2.20 mm in both groups; however, the sheath/radial artery diameter (S/RA) ratio was significantly smaller in the SH-GC group (1.03 vs. 1.17, p<0.001). SH-GC was associated with a higher rate of system crossover (1.7% vs. 0.7%, p=0.450) and coronary ostial dissection (1.0% vs. 0.3%, p=0.624), although there were no statistically significant differences. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events was comparable. A lower incidence of RAO and access-site crossover owing to RAS was significantly associated with SH-GC (0.0% vs. 2.0%, p=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that a larger S/RA ratio predicted RAO and RAS independently (p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The 6.5 Fr SH-GC offers a promising alternative to conventional TRI and is associated with fewer radial complications than the 6.0 Fr GSS.