Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1512-1519. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00542.
We sought to assess eventual changes in iFR measurements in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before and after TAVI in coronary lesions with different degrees of angiographic severity.
The functional relevance of 145 coronary lesions was assessed by online iFR and FFR measurement in 66 patients with severe AS before and after TAVI, during the same procedure. The iFR-FFR classification agreement was calculated for pre-TAVI and post-TAVI measurements. Mean iFR values remained identical before and after TAVI, irrespective of the angiographic severity of the coronary stenosis (0.89±0.12 vs. 0.89±0.12, p=0.66). However, individual iFR values varied widely after TAVI and the 0.89 iFR threshold was crossed by 15% of the investigated coronary lesions. Higher iFR variation was related to a higher transaortic gradient drop after valve intervention. The diagnostic accuracy of iFR in predicting an FFR ≤0.8 was poor (65%) in lesions with severe obstructions, and tended to increase post TAVI.
Although overall values did not change after TAVI, iFR presented significant and mostly erratic individual variations after valve replacement. Delta iFR was influenced by the extent of the transaortic gradient drop induced by TAVI. Therefore, caution is advisable in the interpretation of iFR in the presence of AS.
我们旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)前后不同严重程度冠状动脉病变患者的瞬时无波比值(iFR)测量值的变化。
66 例严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者在 TAVI 前后进行了在线 iFR 和血流储备分数(FFR)测量,评估了 145 处冠状动脉病变的功能相关性。计算了 TAVI 前后测量的 iFR-FFR 分类一致性。无论冠状动脉狭窄的血管造影严重程度如何,iFR 值在 TAVI 前后均保持相同(0.89±0.12 比 0.89±0.12,p=0.66)。然而,TAVI 后个体 iFR 值变化很大,15%的研究冠状动脉病变的 iFR 值超过了 0.89 的阈值。较高的 iFR 变化与瓣膜介入后跨主动脉梯度下降较高有关。iFR 预测 FFR≤0.8 的诊断准确性在严重阻塞病变中较差(65%),且在 TAVI 后有增加的趋势。
尽管 TAVI 后整体值没有变化,但 iFR 在瓣膜置换后呈现出显著且大多不稳定的个体变化。Delta iFR 受 TAVI 引起的跨主动脉梯度下降程度的影响。因此,在存在 AS 的情况下,解释 iFR 时应谨慎。