Chen Lianguo, Qian Pei-Yuan
Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China.
State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Mar Drugs. 2017 Aug 28;15(9):264. doi: 10.3390/md15090264.
Better understanding of the mechanisms of antifouling compounds is recognized to be of high value in establishing sensitive biomarkers, allowing the targeted optimization of antifouling compounds and guaranteeing environmental safety. Despite vigorous efforts to find new antifouling compounds, information about the mechanisms of antifouling is still scarce. This review summarizes the progress into understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying antifouling activity since 2012. Non-toxic mechanisms aimed at specific targets, including inhibitors of transmembrane transport, quorum sensing inhibitors, neurotransmission blockers, adhesive production/release inhibitors and enzyme/protein inhibitors, are put forward for natural antifouling products or shelf-stable chemicals. Several molecular targets show good potential for use as biomarkers in future mechanistic screening, such as acetylcholine esterase for neurotransmission, phenoloxidase/tyrosinase for the formation of adhesive plaques, -acyl homoserine lactone for quorum sensing and intracellular Ca levels as second messenger. The studies on overall responses to challenges by antifoulants can be categorized as general targets, including protein expression/metabolic activity regulators, oxidative stress inducers, neurotransmission blockers, surface modifiers, biofilm inhibitors, adhesive production/release inhibitors and toxic killing. Given the current situation and the knowledge gaps regarding the development of alternative antifoulants, a basic workflow is proposed that covers the indispensable steps, including preliminary mechanism- or bioassay-guided screening, evaluation of environmental risks, field antifouling performance, clarification of antifouling mechanisms and the establishment of sensitive biomarkers, which are combined to construct a positive feedback loop.
人们认识到,更好地理解防污化合物的作用机制对于建立敏感的生物标志物、实现防污化合物的靶向优化以及确保环境安全具有很高的价值。尽管人们大力致力于寻找新的防污化合物,但有关防污机制的信息仍然匮乏。本综述总结了自2012年以来在理解防污活性分子机制方面取得的进展。针对天然防污产品或货架稳定化学品,提出了针对特定靶点的无毒机制,包括跨膜运输抑制剂、群体感应抑制剂、神经传递阻滞剂、黏附物产生/释放抑制剂和酶/蛋白质抑制剂。一些分子靶点在未来的机制筛选中显示出作为生物标志物的良好潜力,例如用于神经传递的乙酰胆碱酯酶、用于黏附斑形成的酚氧化酶/酪氨酸酶、用于群体感应的N-酰基高丝氨酸内酯以及作为第二信使的细胞内钙水平。关于防污剂对挑战的整体反应的研究可归类为一般靶点,包括蛋白质表达/代谢活性调节剂、氧化应激诱导剂、神经传递阻滞剂、表面改性剂、生物膜抑制剂、黏附物产生/释放抑制剂和毒性杀灭。鉴于目前替代防污剂开发的现状和知识空白,提出了一个基本工作流程,涵盖了不可或缺的步骤,包括初步的机制或生物测定指导筛选、环境风险评估、现场防污性能、防污机制的阐明以及敏感生物标志物的建立,这些步骤相互结合构成一个正反馈回路。