• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非创伤性相关失血性休克的大量输血实践。

Massive transfusion practice in non-trauma related hemorrhagic shock.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Transfusion Medicine, St. Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.033
PMID:28846895
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence suggests that trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock requiring massive transfusion have improved outcomes if resuscitated with a prescribed massive transfusion protocol (MTP). However, there is limited data regarding the efficacy of MTP in non-trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of all patients who received a massive transfusion protocol for non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock over a four-year period. The primary outcome was in-patient hospital survival. We dichotomized recipients of MTP into survivors versus non-survivors, comparing outcomes of interest within the categories by nonparametric testing. Summary statistics expressed as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were reviewed, with the median age of 59.0 (35.0-71.0) years old. Thirty-three (56%) patients survived. Survivors were younger, 57.0 (30.0-67.0) versus 64.0 (53.5-71.5) years old (p=0.047), and had lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (6.0 (3.0-8.0) versus11.5 (9.5-13.0); p=0.008). Patients on the medical service receiving MTP had an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio 4.26; p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Over half of the patients receiving massive transfusion protocols for their non-trauma related hemorrhagic shock survived. Survivors were younger, were less acutely ill, and on non-medical services. Further research is needed to investigate best practice for transfusion in non-trauma related hemorrhagic shock.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,接受大量输血的失血性休克创伤患者,如果使用规定的大量输血方案(MTP)进行复苏,其预后会得到改善。然而,关于非创伤患者 MTP 的疗效数据有限。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了四年期间接受非创伤性失血性休克大量输血方案的所有患者。主要结局是住院患者的生存情况。我们将接受 MTP 的患者分为幸存者和非幸存者,通过非参数检验比较各分类中感兴趣的结局。汇总统计数据表示为中位数(四分位距)。

结果

共回顾了 59 例患者,中位年龄为 59.0(35.0-71.0)岁。33 例(56%)患者存活。幸存者更年轻,57.0(30.0-67.0)岁 vs 64.0(53.5-71.5)岁(p=0.047),且序贯器官衰竭评估评分更低(6.0(3.0-8.0)vs 11.5(9.5-13.0);p=0.008)。接受 MTP 的内科患者死亡风险增加(比值比 4.26;p=0.02)。

结论

超过一半的非创伤相关失血性休克患者接受大量输血方案治疗后存活。幸存者更年轻,病情较轻,且不在内科。需要进一步研究以调查非创伤相关失血性休克输血的最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Massive transfusion practice in non-trauma related hemorrhagic shock.非创伤性相关失血性休克的大量输血实践。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Debunking the survival bias myth: characterization of mortality during the initial 24 hours for patients requiring massive transfusion.破除生存偏差的神话:需要大量输血的患者最初 24 小时内死亡率的特征。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):358-64; discussion 364. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825889ba.
3
Field intubation in civilian patients with hemorrhagic shock is associated with higher mortality.对出血性休克的 civilian 患者进行现场插管与更高的死亡率相关。 注:这里“civilian”结合语境推测可能是“平民”“普通民众”的意思,但如果有更准确的背景信息,翻译可能会更精准。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Feb;80(2):278-82. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000901.
4
Ten-year analysis of transfusion in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: increased plasma and platelet use correlates with improved survival.在伊拉克自由行动和持久自由行动中输血的十年分析:增加血浆和血小板的使用与存活率的提高相关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6 Suppl 5):S445-52. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754796.
5
Compliance with a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) impacts patient outcome.遵循大量输血方案(MTP)会影响患者的治疗结果。
Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
6
Activation of Massive Transfusion for Elderly Trauma Patients.老年创伤患者大量输血的启动
Am Surg. 2015 Oct;81(10):945-9.
7
Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.休克指数与ABC评分预测创伤患者大量输血需求的准确性。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Shock index and pulse pressure as triggers for massive transfusion.休克指数和脉压作为大量输血的触发指标。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1S Suppl 1):S159-S164. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002333.
9
Massive transfusion in trauma: blood product ratios should be measured at 6 hours.创伤中的大量输血:应在6小时时测量血液制品比例。
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Mar;82(3):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05967.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
10
Massive transfusion--evaluation of current clinical practice and outcome in two large teaching hospital trusts in Northern England.大量输血——英格兰北部两个教学医院信托的当前临床实践和结果评估。
Vox Sang. 2009 Oct;97(3):247-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01198.x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole blood vs saline for MAP restoration in anesthetized piglets after non-traumatic hemorrhagic shock: an experimental study.全血与生理盐水用于非创伤性失血性休克麻醉仔猪平均动脉压恢复的实验研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12273-3.
2
Massive Transfusion Protocol and Outcome of Patients with Acute Variceal Bleeding.大量输血方案与急性静脉曲张出血患者的预后
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 28;13(9):2588. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092588.
3
Transfusion practice in Central Norway - a regional cohort study in patients suffering from major haemorrhage.
挪威中部的输血实践——一项针对大出血患者的区域性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 7;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00918-3.
4
A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique.通过改良德尔菲技术制定的区域大规模出血预案。
CMAJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;7(3):E546-E561. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190042. Print 2019 Jul-Sep.
5
RBC Transfusion Strategies in the ICU: A Concise Review.重症监护病房红细胞输注策略:简要综述。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1637-1644. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003985.
6
Optimizing transfusion strategies in damage control resuscitation: current insights.优化损伤控制复苏中的输血策略:当前见解
J Blood Med. 2018 Aug 20;9:117-133. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S165394. eCollection 2018.