1Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods,Case Western Reserve University,Cleveland,OH,USA.
4School of Nutrition and Health Promotion,Arizona State University,Tempe,AZ,USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Nov;20(16):2859-2868. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002002. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Access to nutritious foods is key to achieving health promotion goals. While there is evidence that nutritious food access is complex, measures assessing multiple domains of access, including spatial-temporal, economic, social, service delivery and personal, are lacking. The current study evaluates psychometric properties of scales designed to measure perceptions of multiple domains of nutritious food access among low-income populations.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2015. Eighty-one items were selected or developed to represent five domains of nutritious food access for food shopping overall and specific to shopping at farmers' markets. Evaluation of the items included exploratory factor analysis within each domain and internal consistency reliability for each of the sub-scales.
Data were collected in seventeen urban neighbourhoods in Greater Cleveland, Ohio, USA that have high levels of poverty. All participants had access to at least one farmers' market within 1·6 km (1 mile) of their home to standardize spatial access to nutritious foods.
Adults (n 304) receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits.
Each domain included multiple sub-domains: spatial-temporal (four), service delivery (two), economic (two), social (three) and personal (three), for a total of fourteen subdomains. The internal consistency reliability for one of the sub-domains was outstanding (>0·90), seven were excellent (0·80-0·89), five were very good (0·70-0·79) and one scale had poor reliability (0·58).
Multiple sub-domains of nutritious food access can be assessed using short measures that have been tested for internal consistency. These measures are suitable for assessing the complex phenomena of nutritious food access among low-income populations.
获得营养食品是实现促进健康目标的关键。虽然有证据表明获得营养食品的途径很复杂,但缺乏评估包括时空、经济、社会、服务提供和个人等多个领域的途径的措施。本研究评估了旨在衡量低收入人群对营养食品多种途径的看法的量表的心理测量学特性。
2015 年进行了一项横断面调查。选择或开发了 81 项指标,以代表整体营养食品购物和特定于农贸市场购物的五个营养食品获取领域。对这些项目的评估包括每个领域的探索性因子分析和每个子量表的内部一致性信度。
数据来自美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰市的 17 个城市社区,这些社区的贫困程度很高。所有参与者都可以在距离家 1.6 公里(1 英里)以内的地方获得至少一个农贸市场,以标准化获得营养食品的空间。
接受补充营养援助计划(SNAP)福利的成年人(n 304)。
每个领域都包含多个子领域:时空(4 个)、服务提供(2 个)、经济(2 个)、社会(3 个)和个人(3 个),共计 14 个子领域。其中一个子领域的内部一致性信度非常好(>0.90),七个优秀(0.80-0.89),五个非常好(0.70-0.79),一个尺度的可靠性较差(0.58)。
可以使用经过内部一致性测试的简短措施来评估营养食品获取的多个子领域。这些措施适合评估低收入人群中营养食品获取的复杂现象。